RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    기술교사가 인식하고 있는 기술적 능력의 영역과 요소의 내용

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104836067

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to identify the contents of areas and components of technological capability by technology teachers. To achieve the purpose of this study, Delphi survey was carried out. The number of Delphi panel members that participated in final third round was 18. All the panel members were secondary school teachers. The main findings of this survey were as followings: (1) The identified number of total groups of categorized technological capabilities by technology teachers was 6. And the agreement levels of panel members on each group of capabilities in 5 Likert-scale were relatively high(over Mean=3.56). The groups of capabilities are (a) application of technological system(Mean=4.28, Std. Dev.=0.46), (b) technological problem-solving(Mean=4.83, Std. Dev.=0.38), (c) application of information/communication technology(Mean=4.33, Std. Dev.=0.59), (d) concerning of a consumer(Mean=3.61, Std. Dev.=0.70), (e) improving technological environment(Mean=3.56, Std. Dev.=0.62), (f) determining one's job(Mean=4.11, Std. Dev.=0.76). (2) (a) The number of capabilities in the group of application of technological system was 3, (b) that of the technological problem-solving was 5, (c) that of application of information/communication technology was 4, (c) that of concerning of a consumer was 4, (d) that of improving technological environment was 3, and that of (f) determining one's job was 3. The agreement levels of panel members on capabilities in each group in 5 Likert-scale were relatively high(over Mean=3.61).
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to identify the contents of areas and components of technological capability by technology teachers. To achieve the purpose of this study, Delphi survey was carried out. The number of Delphi panel members that participate...

    The purpose of this study was to identify the contents of areas and components of technological capability by technology teachers. To achieve the purpose of this study, Delphi survey was carried out. The number of Delphi panel members that participated in final third round was 18. All the panel members were secondary school teachers. The main findings of this survey were as followings: (1) The identified number of total groups of categorized technological capabilities by technology teachers was 6. And the agreement levels of panel members on each group of capabilities in 5 Likert-scale were relatively high(over Mean=3.56). The groups of capabilities are (a) application of technological system(Mean=4.28, Std. Dev.=0.46), (b) technological problem-solving(Mean=4.83, Std. Dev.=0.38), (c) application of information/communication technology(Mean=4.33, Std. Dev.=0.59), (d) concerning of a consumer(Mean=3.61, Std. Dev.=0.70), (e) improving technological environment(Mean=3.56, Std. Dev.=0.62), (f) determining one's job(Mean=4.11, Std. Dev.=0.76). (2) (a) The number of capabilities in the group of application of technological system was 3, (b) that of the technological problem-solving was 5, (c) that of application of information/communication technology was 4, (c) that of concerning of a consumer was 4, (d) that of improving technological environment was 3, and that of (f) determining one's job was 3. The agreement levels of panel members on capabilities in each group in 5 Likert-scale were relatively high(over Mean=3.61).

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2014-01-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.52 1.52 1.72
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.66 1.72 2.247 0.44
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼