RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    토론에 나타난 대응쌍 연구 = On Adjacency Pairs in Discussions: A Corpus-based Study

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76196814

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The notion of the adjacency pair and its characteristics have been among the primary foci in discourse analysis research. Most of the research, however, has been based on personal discourse by a small number of discourse participants. Widening the scope and diversifying the types, this research is based on actual data corpus of discussions of formal nature with a large number of discourse participants, and tried to characterize adjacency pairs occurring in such discourses. As a groundwork for this research, an annotated corpus tagged with speech act and adjacency pair information has been developed. In order to make such information tagging possible with precision and efficiency, a tagset and an editing tool SORITAG were also developed. Among notable findings in this research with reference to adjacency pairs are that for an adjacency pair, it is essential that the speaker's giving utterance and the addressee's receiving utterance occur sequentially, and that as long as this is observed other requirements previously regarded as constraints, such as the adjacency constraint, the pattern observance constraint, etc., do not in fact function as constraints. With reference to discussion discourses, this paper identifies the typology of adjacency pairs providing explanations as to each of such types, and claims that the binary distinction of preferred vs, non-preferred categories is not optimal in certain cases, which thus leads us to proposing that, in addition to the two categories, introducing the third category, i.e. an intermediate transitional category between them, is necessary.
    번역하기

    The notion of the adjacency pair and its characteristics have been among the primary foci in discourse analysis research. Most of the research, however, has been based on personal discourse by a small number of discourse participants. Widening the sco...

    The notion of the adjacency pair and its characteristics have been among the primary foci in discourse analysis research. Most of the research, however, has been based on personal discourse by a small number of discourse participants. Widening the scope and diversifying the types, this research is based on actual data corpus of discussions of formal nature with a large number of discourse participants, and tried to characterize adjacency pairs occurring in such discourses. As a groundwork for this research, an annotated corpus tagged with speech act and adjacency pair information has been developed. In order to make such information tagging possible with precision and efficiency, a tagset and an editing tool SORITAG were also developed. Among notable findings in this research with reference to adjacency pairs are that for an adjacency pair, it is essential that the speaker's giving utterance and the addressee's receiving utterance occur sequentially, and that as long as this is observed other requirements previously regarded as constraints, such as the adjacency constraint, the pattern observance constraint, etc., do not in fact function as constraints. With reference to discussion discourses, this paper identifies the typology of adjacency pairs providing explanations as to each of such types, and claims that the binary distinction of preferred vs, non-preferred categories is not optimal in certain cases, which thus leads us to proposing that, in addition to the two categories, introducing the third category, i.e. an intermediate transitional category between them, is necessary.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 연구개요
    • 2. 토론에 나타난 대응쌍의 특징
    • 3. 토론에 나타난 대응쌍과 대화 진행 양상
    • 4. 마무리
    • 참고 문헌
    • 1. 연구개요
    • 2. 토론에 나타난 대응쌍의 특징
    • 3. 토론에 나타난 대응쌍과 대화 진행 양상
    • 4. 마무리
    • 참고 문헌
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2014-09-01 학회명변경 영문명 :   -> The Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics Society of Korea KCI등재
    2014-01-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Discourse and Cognition KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-12-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 담화ㆍ인지언어학회 -> 담화·인지언어학회
    영문명 : 미등록 ->  
    KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-04-29 학술지등록 한글명 : 담화와 인지
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.44 0.44 0.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.49 0.53 0.841 0.22
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼