RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    영국사회 연구를 위한 비교분석기법  :  비교지역연구를 위한 사례선택의 문제 = Tools For The Comparative Analysis Of British Society

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40022749

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    There are two research questions concerning the comparative analysis of British society in Western Europe: whether British society shares common attributes with West European countries ; furthermore, what (or why) should be compared. This article aims to provide readers with a more plausible answer to those puzzles. Therefore, the guiding question in this article is to what extent similarity or difference between British society and West European countries can constrain a comparative analysis. The short answer to this question is that it is time for the dialectical comparison between British society and West European countries to be advanced as a significant explanatory category in contemporary comparative analysis. In this article, the attention has been paid to the matter of case selection. Although it is possible to witness differences between British society and West European countries, usually scholars in a comparative analysis have utilised the Most Similar Systems Design in comparing them.
    On the other hand, this study cannot tell us the full story of how we can obtain a mature comparative analysis. This is because there are many factors not covered in this article. First, we need to examine the methodological challenges to the time-honoured designs of a comparative analysis responding to the co-existence of similarity and difference in the attributes of cases. Second, we need also to combine the case-centric analysis with the variable-centric analysis. Without being accompanied by these explorations, this study cannot be perfect in providing readers with a full understanding of a comparative analysis. The author hopes this article will provide an impetus for other future researchers in which those missing factors are considered.
    번역하기

    There are two research questions concerning the comparative analysis of British society in Western Europe: whether British society shares common attributes with West European countries ; furthermore, what (or why) should be compared. This article aims...

    There are two research questions concerning the comparative analysis of British society in Western Europe: whether British society shares common attributes with West European countries ; furthermore, what (or why) should be compared. This article aims to provide readers with a more plausible answer to those puzzles. Therefore, the guiding question in this article is to what extent similarity or difference between British society and West European countries can constrain a comparative analysis. The short answer to this question is that it is time for the dialectical comparison between British society and West European countries to be advanced as a significant explanatory category in contemporary comparative analysis. In this article, the attention has been paid to the matter of case selection. Although it is possible to witness differences between British society and West European countries, usually scholars in a comparative analysis have utilised the Most Similar Systems Design in comparing them.
    On the other hand, this study cannot tell us the full story of how we can obtain a mature comparative analysis. This is because there are many factors not covered in this article. First, we need to examine the methodological challenges to the time-honoured designs of a comparative analysis responding to the co-existence of similarity and difference in the attributes of cases. Second, we need also to combine the case-centric analysis with the variable-centric analysis. Without being accompanied by these explorations, this study cannot be perfect in providing readers with a full understanding of a comparative analysis. The author hopes this article will provide an impetus for other future researchers in which those missing factors are considered.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
    • Ⅱ. 지역연구의 주요 주제와 비교의 목적
    • Ⅲ. 비교정치분야에서의 비교지역연구의 적정 수준
    • Ⅳ. 서유럽국가의 체계적 속성 비교
    • 1. 최대유사체계로 보는 견해
    • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
    • Ⅱ. 지역연구의 주요 주제와 비교의 목적
    • Ⅲ. 비교정치분야에서의 비교지역연구의 적정 수준
    • Ⅳ. 서유럽국가의 체계적 속성 비교
    • 1. 최대유사체계로 보는 견해
    • 2. 최대상이체계로 보는 견해
    • 3. 정치제도로 비교해본 유럽의 체계적 상이성과 유사성
    • Ⅴ. 나가는 말
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼