RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    판매촉진 수단 유형의 판촉효과 비교

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856567

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The impact and usage of sale promotion in marketing have been increasing out rapidly. However, marketing academicians pay not much attention to this area since a new type of sales promotion is introduced in every day and there is not much promotion-related data stored. The reason why academics don’t catch up real marketing world is lack of framework to compare, evaluate, and create promotional tools. The paper proposes a new structure of sales promotion tools and compares the effectiveness of various sales promotion tools based on the structure. The structure of sales promotion tools is composed by three factors, characteristics of benefit, time of benefit endorsement, and precondition for benefit. The first factor divides promotional tools into the ones that give customers monetary benefits by discount and the others that give non-monetary benefits. The second factor divides promotional tools into the ones that give customers benefits immediately right after they agree to take promotion and the others that give benefits a certain period time later, for example, you can use it next visit. The third factor divides promotional tool into the ones that give benefits to the customers who can satisfy certain conditions, and the others that give benefits without any condition. Various promotional tools could be classified into one of eight categories in this structure.If one understands the characteristics of each category in this structure, such as how much effective it is on increasing sale volume and on communicating with customers under different situations, marketing people can select a proper promotional tool for his marketing objective in a given situation.Based on this framework, the paper try to find out effectiveness of three factors on both sale and communication. Sales effect consists of brand switching, sale volume increase, and repurchase intention, and communication effect consists of attitude for sales promotion, attitude for brand, and purchase intention. The paper develop hypothesis that price discount is better than non-monetary benefit, immediate benefit is better than delayed benefit, and conditional benefit is better than non-conditional benefit from existing theories, such as prospect theory, mental accounting, and self perception theory. The study conducts a questionnaire survey with experimental elements. It shows 8 different SPAD(sales promotional advertising) to subjects and gets measures about their evaluations. Number of respondents is 237 and most of them are students. The result shows that price discount type, immediate benefit type and conditional benefit type are more effective than the other type in the same factor for most cases. However, promotional tool of non-conditional benefit is better in brand switching situation. This study suggests that marketers should provide consumers with a price discount rather than non-monetary benefit. The reason behind this is that price discount is perceived as sacrifice reduction (pay less) rather than benefit increase (unexpected money) and sacrifice reduction is usually perceived as more salient than benefit increase. Therefore marketers need to develop a promotion tool that consumer tends to perceive as sacrifice reduction. The results also shows that immediate benefit can be perceived as sacrifice reduction and delayed benefit as benefit increase since immediate benefit may be perceived as slashing price paid. Conditional promotion needs consumer’s involvement and it becomes more effective in making sales and communication. In order to generalize this result, one has to apply it to many other situations with different promotional tools in a stricter experimental design.
    번역하기

    The impact and usage of sale promotion in marketing have been increasing out rapidly. However, marketing academicians pay not much attention to this area since a new type of sales promotion is introduced in every day and there is not much promotion-re...

    The impact and usage of sale promotion in marketing have been increasing out rapidly. However, marketing academicians pay not much attention to this area since a new type of sales promotion is introduced in every day and there is not much promotion-related data stored. The reason why academics don’t catch up real marketing world is lack of framework to compare, evaluate, and create promotional tools. The paper proposes a new structure of sales promotion tools and compares the effectiveness of various sales promotion tools based on the structure. The structure of sales promotion tools is composed by three factors, characteristics of benefit, time of benefit endorsement, and precondition for benefit. The first factor divides promotional tools into the ones that give customers monetary benefits by discount and the others that give non-monetary benefits. The second factor divides promotional tools into the ones that give customers benefits immediately right after they agree to take promotion and the others that give benefits a certain period time later, for example, you can use it next visit. The third factor divides promotional tool into the ones that give benefits to the customers who can satisfy certain conditions, and the others that give benefits without any condition. Various promotional tools could be classified into one of eight categories in this structure.If one understands the characteristics of each category in this structure, such as how much effective it is on increasing sale volume and on communicating with customers under different situations, marketing people can select a proper promotional tool for his marketing objective in a given situation.Based on this framework, the paper try to find out effectiveness of three factors on both sale and communication. Sales effect consists of brand switching, sale volume increase, and repurchase intention, and communication effect consists of attitude for sales promotion, attitude for brand, and purchase intention. The paper develop hypothesis that price discount is better than non-monetary benefit, immediate benefit is better than delayed benefit, and conditional benefit is better than non-conditional benefit from existing theories, such as prospect theory, mental accounting, and self perception theory. The study conducts a questionnaire survey with experimental elements. It shows 8 different SPAD(sales promotional advertising) to subjects and gets measures about their evaluations. Number of respondents is 237 and most of them are students. The result shows that price discount type, immediate benefit type and conditional benefit type are more effective than the other type in the same factor for most cases. However, promotional tool of non-conditional benefit is better in brand switching situation. This study suggests that marketers should provide consumers with a price discount rather than non-monetary benefit. The reason behind this is that price discount is perceived as sacrifice reduction (pay less) rather than benefit increase (unexpected money) and sacrifice reduction is usually perceived as more salient than benefit increase. Therefore marketers need to develop a promotion tool that consumer tends to perceive as sacrifice reduction. The results also shows that immediate benefit can be perceived as sacrifice reduction and delayed benefit as benefit increase since immediate benefit may be perceived as slashing price paid. Conditional promotion needs consumer’s involvement and it becomes more effective in making sales and communication. In order to generalize this result, one has to apply it to many other situations with different promotional tools in a stricter experimental design.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "프로모션 에센스, 무역경영사, 판매촉진-광고(SPAD)의 감정적 효과에대한 실증적 연구" 장대련 (8호, 가을호) : 79-90, 2000

    2 "전사적 관점의마케팅" 학현사 2000

    3 "소비자의 인구통계적 특성이 판매촉진 민감도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구”" 13 (13): 99-117, 2002

    4 "”Journal of Marketing Research" 1965pp186-189

    5 "” inHandbook of Social Psychology" 231-310, 1985

    6 "” Journal of MarketingResearch" 369-377, 1978

    7 "” In Promotional DecisionsUsing Mathmatical Models" 50-85, 1967

    8 "“판매촉진에 관한 문헌 연구 ”" (20) : 51-69, 1993

    9 "“Using Supermarket ScannerPanels to Measure the Effectiveness ofCoupon Promotions ” in Proceedings TheInstitute of Management Sciences" 118-124, 1981

    10 "“Toward a NormativeModel of Promotional Decision Making" 435-450, 1973

    1 "프로모션 에센스, 무역경영사, 판매촉진-광고(SPAD)의 감정적 효과에대한 실증적 연구" 장대련 (8호, 가을호) : 79-90, 2000

    2 "전사적 관점의마케팅" 학현사 2000

    3 "소비자의 인구통계적 특성이 판매촉진 민감도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구”" 13 (13): 99-117, 2002

    4 "”Journal of Marketing Research" 1965pp186-189

    5 "” inHandbook of Social Psychology" 231-310, 1985

    6 "” Journal of MarketingResearch" 369-377, 1978

    7 "” In Promotional DecisionsUsing Mathmatical Models" 50-85, 1967

    8 "“판매촉진에 관한 문헌 연구 ”" (20) : 51-69, 1993

    9 "“Using Supermarket ScannerPanels to Measure the Effectiveness ofCoupon Promotions ” in Proceedings TheInstitute of Management Sciences" 118-124, 1981

    10 "“Toward a NormativeModel of Promotional Decision Making" 435-450, 1973

    11 "“The Effect of a Direct Mail Coupon onBrand Choice Behavior ” Journal of MarketingResearch" (v) : 370-376, 1987b

    12 "“The Coupon-Prone Consumer Some FindingsBased on Purchase Behavior Across ProductClasses ” Journal of Marketing" 99-110, 1987a

    13 "“Psychological Perspectives on ConsumerResponse to Sales Promotion ” in Researchon Sales Promotion" 47-62, 1984

    14 "“Promotion has a Negative Effecton Brand Evaluation - Or Does it? AdditionalDisconfirmming Evidence ” Journal of MarketingResearch" 143-148, 1992

    15 "“Impacts of Deals and Deal Retractionon Brand switching" 72-81, 1978

    16 "“Effects of Trial and Incentiveson Repeat Purchase Behavior" 263-239, 1976

    17 "“Effect ofInitial Selling Price on Subsequent Sales ”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology" 345-350, 1969

    18 "“Determinants of CouponEffectiveness ” in Advances and Practicesof Marketing Science 1983" 157-164, 1983

    19 "“Dealing-Temporary Price Cuts bySeller as an Buyer Discrimination Mechanism ”Journal of business" 295-308, 1985

    20 "“Consumer Response to Promotional Deals ”Journal of Marketing" 109-113, 1978

    21 "“Consumer Promotion andthe Acceleration of Product Purchases" 147-165, 1985

    22 "“Consumer CharacteristicsAssociated with Dealing ” Journal of MarketingResearch" 118-120, 1971

    23 "“Analyzing Incremental Sales From aDirect Mail Coupon Promotion" 66-78, 1989

    24 "“An Experimental Technique forExploring the Psychological Mechanisms ofthe Effects of Price Promotions" 133-137, 1985

    25 "“A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluationof Price Deals for Consumer Nondurables ”Journal of Marketing" 116-129, 1981

    26 "“A Price DiscriminationTheory of Coupon" 128-147, 1984

    27 "“A Model for Evaluating the Profitability ofCoupon Promotion" 361-388, 1983

    28 "“A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibratedon Scanner Data" 203-238, 1983

    29 "WhenDo Price Promotions Affect Pretrial BrandEvaluations?" 36 : 211-222, 1999,May

    30 "Sales Promotion Essentials:The 10 Basic Sales Promotion Techniques..and How to Use Them, 3rd ed" NTC Business Books 1998

    31 "Measuringthe Price Knowledge Shoppers Bringto the Store" 6 : 72-85, October,2002

    32 "Marketing Management: Analysis,Planning and Control, 9th ed" Prentice-Hall Inc 1997

    33 "Long-Term Effects ofPrice Promotions on Category Incidence, BrandChoice, and Purchase Quantity" 36 : 421-439, 2002

    34 "ItsRelevance to Marketing and Promotion ”Journal of Marketing" 70-78, 1981

    35 "Coupons in Context Discounting Prices or Decreasing Profits?" 80 : 1-12, 2004

    36 "Benefit Congruency Frameworkof Sales Promotion Effectiveness" 64 : 65-81, 2000

    37 "AnEmpirical Investigation of the SpilloverEffects of Advertising and Sales Promotionsin Umbrella Branding" 36 : 408-420, 2002

    38 "An Analysis of decisionUnder Risk" Kahneman ” eco (” eco): 263-291, 1979

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼