RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      웹기반 학습환경에서 학습양식이 학업성취 및 웹기반 학습자 지원기능 선호에 미치는 영향 = Effects of Learning Style on Learning Achievement and the Preference for Learner-Support Functions in a Web-Based Instruction

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959867

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      It seemed to be important to understand a learner`s learning style and his/her preference for various ``learner-support functions`` which provided in a Web-Based Instruction(WBI) for designing and developing more appropriate and individualized Web-based teaching and learning environments. Therefore, the study investigated effects of learning style on learning achievement and learner-support function preference in the WBI environment. The study employed Kolb`s categories of learning style with Concrete(Accommodator, Diverger) vs. Abstract(Converger, Assimilator) and six types of learner-support functions in WBI, such as learning preparation, learning content, learning materials, task & evaluation, interaction, and learning support. Results of the study indicated that students with abstract learning style gained higher achievement scores than students with concrete learning style in WBI. In addition, outstanding students with abstract learning style more preferred the learning support function, but outstanding students with concrete learning style were more interested in the learning material function. These findings indicated that different learning styles should be concerned for design and develop more effective WBI environments.
      번역하기

      It seemed to be important to understand a learner`s learning style and his/her preference for various ``learner-support functions`` which provided in a Web-Based Instruction(WBI) for designing and developing more appropriate and individualized Web-bas...

      It seemed to be important to understand a learner`s learning style and his/her preference for various ``learner-support functions`` which provided in a Web-Based Instruction(WBI) for designing and developing more appropriate and individualized Web-based teaching and learning environments. Therefore, the study investigated effects of learning style on learning achievement and learner-support function preference in the WBI environment. The study employed Kolb`s categories of learning style with Concrete(Accommodator, Diverger) vs. Abstract(Converger, Assimilator) and six types of learner-support functions in WBI, such as learning preparation, learning content, learning materials, task & evaluation, interaction, and learning support. Results of the study indicated that students with abstract learning style gained higher achievement scores than students with concrete learning style in WBI. In addition, outstanding students with abstract learning style more preferred the learning support function, but outstanding students with concrete learning style were more interested in the learning material function. These findings indicated that different learning styles should be concerned for design and develop more effective WBI environments.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼