RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    간호사 경력개발제도에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Clinical Ladder System Model for Hospital Nurses

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A35492814

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose: This study was aimed to develop a desirable clinical ladder system(CLS) model for hospital nurses in order to make recommendations for CLS application in Korea. Methods: This study was carried out through literature review and a survey of the state of CLS application in Korea. 134 hospital nurses who attended the seminar on CLS. participated in the survey. Results: 1. Most of hospital nurses have positive attitude toward the introduction of CLS and perceived the CLS would promote excellence in clinical nursing and improve nurses' job satisfaction. 2. To establish a good CLS model, a proper number of stages must be established and the level of excellence in each stage should be clearly delineated. The most preferred one was four-stage model. 3. For evaluation methods for promotion, test, performance evaluation, portfolios, and exemplars were suggested and would be used in combination. However, maintaining fairness and staff nurses' workload and psychological burden challenge the CLS application. 4. For compensation, financial reward was mostly preferred, and chances for personal development and professional compensation, compensation in working conditions and social recognition were proved to be useful. 5. To be successful, excessive stress, sense of incongruity, competitive atmosphere, concerns about unfairness, and despair or withdrawal after failure in promotion or reappointment should be considered and overcome. Conclusion: Some recommendations for introducing CLS were made. In order to suggest an ideal CLS model in Korea, more comprehensive survey and outcome analysis of the CLS are needed.
    번역하기

    Purpose: This study was aimed to develop a desirable clinical ladder system(CLS) model for hospital nurses in order to make recommendations for CLS application in Korea. Methods: This study was carried out through literature review and a survey of the...

    Purpose: This study was aimed to develop a desirable clinical ladder system(CLS) model for hospital nurses in order to make recommendations for CLS application in Korea. Methods: This study was carried out through literature review and a survey of the state of CLS application in Korea. 134 hospital nurses who attended the seminar on CLS. participated in the survey. Results: 1. Most of hospital nurses have positive attitude toward the introduction of CLS and perceived the CLS would promote excellence in clinical nursing and improve nurses' job satisfaction. 2. To establish a good CLS model, a proper number of stages must be established and the level of excellence in each stage should be clearly delineated. The most preferred one was four-stage model. 3. For evaluation methods for promotion, test, performance evaluation, portfolios, and exemplars were suggested and would be used in combination. However, maintaining fairness and staff nurses' workload and psychological burden challenge the CLS application. 4. For compensation, financial reward was mostly preferred, and chances for personal development and professional compensation, compensation in working conditions and social recognition were proved to be useful. 5. To be successful, excessive stress, sense of incongruity, competitive atmosphere, concerns about unfairness, and despair or withdrawal after failure in promotion or reappointment should be considered and overcome. Conclusion: Some recommendations for introducing CLS were made. In order to suggest an ideal CLS model in Korea, more comprehensive survey and outcome analysis of the CLS are needed.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 전인숙, "혈액투석실 간호사의 경력단계별 행동지표개발과 실무교육요구도" 2005

    2 김소선, "중환자실 간호사의 임상등급별 간호역량 측정도구 개발" 2002

    3 이금문, "중환자실 간호사의 경력단계별 실무교육과정개발을 위한 기초조사연구" 2004

    4 정수원, "임상경력개발제도(Clinical ladder system)적용에 대한 간호사의 인식조사" 2003

    5 김희영, "수술실간호사의 임상등급별 간호역량개발" 2005

    6 장금성, "리엔지니어링과 간호의 통합적 관리전략" 2 (2): 185-208, 1997

    7 병원간호사회, "경력관리제도 세미나" 병원간호사회 2005

    8 장금성, "간호사의 임상경력개발시스템에 관한 조명" 3 (3): 1-13, 1998

    9 장금성, "간호사의 임상경력개발모형구축에 관한 연구" 2000

    10 유창희, "간호사의 이직의도에 관한 연구 : 일 대학병원을 중심으로" 1998

    1 전인숙, "혈액투석실 간호사의 경력단계별 행동지표개발과 실무교육요구도" 2005

    2 김소선, "중환자실 간호사의 임상등급별 간호역량 측정도구 개발" 2002

    3 이금문, "중환자실 간호사의 경력단계별 실무교육과정개발을 위한 기초조사연구" 2004

    4 정수원, "임상경력개발제도(Clinical ladder system)적용에 대한 간호사의 인식조사" 2003

    5 김희영, "수술실간호사의 임상등급별 간호역량개발" 2005

    6 장금성, "리엔지니어링과 간호의 통합적 관리전략" 2 (2): 185-208, 1997

    7 병원간호사회, "경력관리제도 세미나" 병원간호사회 2005

    8 장금성, "간호사의 임상경력개발시스템에 관한 조명" 3 (3): 1-13, 1998

    9 장금성, "간호사의 임상경력개발모형구축에 관한 연구" 2000

    10 유창희, "간호사의 이직의도에 관한 연구 : 일 대학병원을 중심으로" 1998

    11 이정희, "간호사 경력개발제도의 한국형 개발전략. 간호사경력개발제도의 개념정립을 위한 세미나자료집" 60-68, 1998

    12 임상간호사회, "간호사 경력개발제도의 개념 정립을 위한 세미나" 임상간호사회 1998

    13 대한간호정책연구소, "간호사 경력개발제도(career ladder system)구축을 위한 기초 연구" 대한간호정책연구소 2006

    14 Buchan, "the next pay step? Nursing Standard" 37-, 1994

    15 Del Bueno, "maybe! Journal of Nursing Administration" 198219-22.

    16 Corley, "impact on nurse satisfaction and turnover. Journal of Nursing Administration" 42-48, 1994

    17 Thornhill, "comparing perceptions of nurse participants and nonparticipants. Health care Supervisor" 16-25, 1994

    18 "University of Maryland Medical System." . Professional practice partnership program. Unpublished manuscript. 1990

    19 Johns Hopkins Medical Center, "Nursing job description" 1999

    20 UCSD Medical Cente, "Nursing job description" UCSD Medical Center 1999

    21 Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, "Nursing job description" 1999

    22 Glenn, M. J, "From clinical ladders to a professional recognition program" 26 (26): 41-42, 1995

    23 Buchan, J, "Evaluating the benefits of a clinical ladder for nursing staff : an international review" 36 (36): 137-144, 1999

    24 Snyder, M. D, "Clinical ladders : do they reflect levels of competence?" 28 (28): 54-93, 1997

    25 Goodloe, L. R, "Clinical ladder to professional advancement program: An evolutionary process" 26 (26): 58-64, 1996

    26 박광옥, "Clinical Nurse Career Ladder System의 개념과 필요성" 49-50, 1998

    27 경희대학교 동서신의학병원 간호본부, "Clinical Ladder System-From novice to expert" 경희대학교 동서신의학병원 간호본부 2006

    28 Buchan, J, "Climbing the clinical ladder" 12 (12): 22-23, 1997

    29 Pettno, P, "A four-level clinical ladder" 29 (29): 52-53, 1998

    30 Krugman, M. K, "A clinical advancement program-evaluating 10 years of progressive change" 30 (30): 215-225, 2000

    31 Day, D. S, "A career ladder program designed by perioperative staff nurses" 62 (62): 805-809, 1995

    32 Shapiro, M. M, "A career ladder based on Benner's Model : an analysis of expected outcomes" 28 (28): 13-19, 1998

    33 최영선, ". 경력개발제도에 관한 연구. 연세대학교 석사학위논문." 1993

    34 Murray, ". Where are career ladders going wrong in the 90th? Nursing Management" 46-48, 1993

    35 Zimmer, ". Rationale for a ladder for clinical advancement in nursing practice. Journal of Nursing Administration" 197218-24.

    36 Huey, ". Looking at ladders. AJN" 1520-1526, 1982

    37 Diana, ". Job satisfaction related to use of clinical ladder. Journal of Nursing Administration" 7-, 1992

    38 Benner,P, ". From novice to expert:Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park,California" Addison-Wesley. 1984

    39 Benner,P, ". From novice to expert. AJN" 81 : 402-407, 1982

    40 Schultz, ". Evaluation of a clinical advancement system. Journal of Nursing Administration" 13-19, 1993

    41 M, ". Completing a cost-benefit analysis for a clinical ladder project. Recruitment Retention" 1-4, 1991

    42 Lysaught,J. P, ". An abstract for action. New York" McGraw-Hill Book Co. 1970

    43 R, ". A clinical ladder for nursing practice. JONA. Sept-Oct" 54-58, 1974

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-04-15 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Clinical Nursing Research -> Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-07-31 학회명변경 한글명 : 임상간호사회 -> 병원간호사회
    영문명 : 미등록 -> Hospital Nurses Association
    KCI등재
    2005-05-27 학술지등록 한글명 : 임상간호연구
    외국어명 : Clinical Nursing Research
    KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.04 1.04 1.14
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.14 1.23 1.94 0.16
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼