RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    개인정보보호법제에 대한 최근 미국의 동향 = The Recent Legal System and its Tendency in Protection of Personal Information in the United States

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A77033247

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The traditional position of how to protect a personal information in the United States is to rely on industry self regulation. However, techNoogies of surveillance, data stalking and commercial profiling create wide spread concern about privacy in personal information. Furthermore, exiting legal rights canner be enough to protect American citizens against offensive data practices. Critics say that self regulation and technical mechanism are an inadequate substitute for legal rights.
    For assuring citizen privacy in this information society, some legal scholars and congressmen in the United States strongly suggest that Congress should enact new legislations to be on level with the internationally acclaimed OECD Guidelines. They also say that Congress should create so-called Data Protection Commission that promotes fair information practices in the United States.
    Although privacy began as an American concept at the end of the 19th century, the United States has lost its leadership role in defining privacy. Because the EU require each of its member states to harmonize data protection rights for citizens at a high level with a set of legal standards. In the absence of stronger legal protection, the United States is still vulnerable to trade war with the EU or other world trade partners. The safe harbor negotiated with the EU is not enough to resolve above issue.
    Therefore, it is said that Congress needs to act to establish a basic set of legal protections for privacy in the United States. Such legal norms should provide for minimum statutory damages in the event of violations as well as being a counterpart as European model of data privacy for guidance.
    번역하기

    The traditional position of how to protect a personal information in the United States is to rely on industry self regulation. However, techNoogies of surveillance, data stalking and commercial profiling create wide spread concern about privacy in per...

    The traditional position of how to protect a personal information in the United States is to rely on industry self regulation. However, techNoogies of surveillance, data stalking and commercial profiling create wide spread concern about privacy in personal information. Furthermore, exiting legal rights canner be enough to protect American citizens against offensive data practices. Critics say that self regulation and technical mechanism are an inadequate substitute for legal rights.
    For assuring citizen privacy in this information society, some legal scholars and congressmen in the United States strongly suggest that Congress should enact new legislations to be on level with the internationally acclaimed OECD Guidelines. They also say that Congress should create so-called Data Protection Commission that promotes fair information practices in the United States.
    Although privacy began as an American concept at the end of the 19th century, the United States has lost its leadership role in defining privacy. Because the EU require each of its member states to harmonize data protection rights for citizens at a high level with a set of legal standards. In the absence of stronger legal protection, the United States is still vulnerable to trade war with the EU or other world trade partners. The safe harbor negotiated with the EU is not enough to resolve above issue.
    Therefore, it is said that Congress needs to act to establish a basic set of legal protections for privacy in the United States. Such legal norms should provide for minimum statutory damages in the event of violations as well as being a counterpart as European model of data privacy for guidance.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 입법현황
    • Ⅲ. 판례입장
    • Ⅳ. 특색
    • Ⅴ. 맺음말
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 입법현황
    • Ⅲ. 판례입장
    • Ⅳ. 특색
    • Ⅴ. 맺음말
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼