RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    學業成就 關聯變因에 관한 統合硏究

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3179634

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study was designed to synthesize quantitatively the master's theses and doctoral dissertations focusing on effects of academic achievement in Korea. This task was accomplished by utilizing the meta - analysis technique of research integration as defined by Class(1982). Basically, meta- analysis is a statistical analysis of the summary findings of many empirical studies. Its purpose is to draw reliable and general conclusions from a large and complex body of literature on a common topic. Thus, the primary purpose of this study was to conduct a quantitative synthesis of 163 master's theses and doctoral dissertations focusing on the effects of the academic achievement. Fourteen independent variables were chosen after review those 163 studies. These were home environment, learning climate, teacher trait, intelligence, creativity, cognitive style, self - concept, anxiety, learning attitude, achievement motivation, personality, academic engaged time, quality of instructional experience, and the others. This study also assesed the relationship between moderator variables and effect sizes. The moderator variables investigated were sex, grade, and subject area.
    The standard procedures which are analogous to these performed during primary research were used in this meta-analysis : locating studies(data collection), coding the characteristics and outcomes of the studies(evaluation of data points), and using statistical procedures of meta-analysis to describe the overall and subsample effects(data analysis and interpretation).
    This meta-analysis has shown a quantifiable positive effect of academic achievement with an overall average. 67 standard deviation. This effect size of. 67 indicate that on the average, the experimental group mean score were increased 24.86 percentile than the control group mean score. In addition, this study calculated effect sizes of intellectual variable group, instruction variable group, social-psychological variable group, affective variable group, and the other variable group, These were .939, .796, .660, .468, and .579.
    번역하기

    This study was designed to synthesize quantitatively the master's theses and doctoral dissertations focusing on effects of academic achievement in Korea. This task was accomplished by utilizing the meta - analysis technique of research integration as ...

    This study was designed to synthesize quantitatively the master's theses and doctoral dissertations focusing on effects of academic achievement in Korea. This task was accomplished by utilizing the meta - analysis technique of research integration as defined by Class(1982). Basically, meta- analysis is a statistical analysis of the summary findings of many empirical studies. Its purpose is to draw reliable and general conclusions from a large and complex body of literature on a common topic. Thus, the primary purpose of this study was to conduct a quantitative synthesis of 163 master's theses and doctoral dissertations focusing on the effects of the academic achievement. Fourteen independent variables were chosen after review those 163 studies. These were home environment, learning climate, teacher trait, intelligence, creativity, cognitive style, self - concept, anxiety, learning attitude, achievement motivation, personality, academic engaged time, quality of instructional experience, and the others. This study also assesed the relationship between moderator variables and effect sizes. The moderator variables investigated were sex, grade, and subject area.
    The standard procedures which are analogous to these performed during primary research were used in this meta-analysis : locating studies(data collection), coding the characteristics and outcomes of the studies(evaluation of data points), and using statistical procedures of meta-analysis to describe the overall and subsample effects(data analysis and interpretation).
    This meta-analysis has shown a quantifiable positive effect of academic achievement with an overall average. 67 standard deviation. This effect size of. 67 indicate that on the average, the experimental group mean score were increased 24.86 percentile than the control group mean score. In addition, this study calculated effect sizes of intellectual variable group, instruction variable group, social-psychological variable group, affective variable group, and the other variable group, These were .939, .796, .660, .468, and .579.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ.序論
    • 1.問題의 提起
    • 2.硏究의 目的
    • 3.用語의 定義
    • 4.硏究의 制限點
    • Ⅰ.序論
    • 1.問題의 提起
    • 2.硏究의 目的
    • 3.用語의 定義
    • 4.硏究의 制限點
    • Ⅱ.硏究의 問題
    • Ⅲ.硏究의 方法
    • 1.資料 蒐集
    • 2.資料 選定
    • 3.資料 分析
    • 4.資料 處理
    • Ⅳ.結果 및 論議
    • 1.結果
    • 2.論議
    • Ⅴ.要約 및 結論
    • 1.要約
    • 2.結論
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼