RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Holland의 직업적 성격과 교육적 행동양식과의 관계 분석 = An Analysis of Relationship between Holland's Vocational Personalities and Educational Behaviors

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3044159

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study examined the relationship between Holland's vocational personalities [RIASEC] and educational behaviors which consisted of academic achievement and adjustment to school. The study examined the effects that differentiation and consistency had on the relationship between two variables as well. Participants were 173 male and 174 female high school sophomores from the metropolitan high schools in Korea. The data for the study was collected by surveying the sample with the instruments, the Self-Directed Search- Korean version and the Adjustment to School Questionnaire. Additionally, demographic information such as gender, courses, and parent's occupations was requested. The differentiation was calculated using a mathematical formula proposed by Iachan (1984), and the hexagonal model-based consistency measures suggested by Strahan (1987) were used to arrive at a consistency index for each student
      The results of the present study were followed: (1) Males preferred the R type more than females, whereas females preferred the S type more. Students in the humanities courses preferred the A, S, and E types, whereas students in the natural courses preferred the R and I types; (2) Students in the humanities courses were more congruent with their mothers' occupations, and students in the natural courses were more congruent with their fathers' occupations; (3) The I type showed the highest achievement and the C and S types showed higher achievement than the A type; (4) The I type adjusted to school most, and the C and S types adjusted themselves academically and generally more than the A type did. Academically, the R type adjusted to school more than the A type. Limitations of the study and implications for further research are discussed.
      번역하기

      This study examined the relationship between Holland's vocational personalities [RIASEC] and educational behaviors which consisted of academic achievement and adjustment to school. The study examined the effects that differentiation and consistency ha...

      This study examined the relationship between Holland's vocational personalities [RIASEC] and educational behaviors which consisted of academic achievement and adjustment to school. The study examined the effects that differentiation and consistency had on the relationship between two variables as well. Participants were 173 male and 174 female high school sophomores from the metropolitan high schools in Korea. The data for the study was collected by surveying the sample with the instruments, the Self-Directed Search- Korean version and the Adjustment to School Questionnaire. Additionally, demographic information such as gender, courses, and parent's occupations was requested. The differentiation was calculated using a mathematical formula proposed by Iachan (1984), and the hexagonal model-based consistency measures suggested by Strahan (1987) were used to arrive at a consistency index for each student
      The results of the present study were followed: (1) Males preferred the R type more than females, whereas females preferred the S type more. Students in the humanities courses preferred the A, S, and E types, whereas students in the natural courses preferred the R and I types; (2) Students in the humanities courses were more congruent with their mothers' occupations, and students in the natural courses were more congruent with their fathers' occupations; (3) The I type showed the highest achievement and the C and S types showed higher achievement than the A type; (4) The I type adjusted to school most, and the C and S types adjusted themselves academically and generally more than the A type did. Academically, the R type adjusted to school more than the A type. Limitations of the study and implications for further research are discussed.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
      • Ⅲ. 연구의 방법
      • Ⅳ. 연구의 결과 및 해석
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
      • Ⅲ. 연구의 방법
      • Ⅳ. 연구의 결과 및 해석
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼