RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    주관적 건강인식과 건강검진 결과의 비교분석을 통한 건강행위 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3007556

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to analyze health behavior by comparing the difference between self-perceived health status and health examination results. The study subjects consist of 7,702 people aged over 20, surveyed by Health Interview survey, Health Examination survey, Dietary Life survey, Health Consciousness and Behavior survey Data used in the study are drawn from raw data from a 1998 National Health and Nutrition survey.
    Goneral characteristics variables are sex, age, education level, residential area, marital status, occupation, and living standard while dichotomous variables, 'not healthy' and 'healthy' are used to measure self-perceived health status. Variables for health examination results are high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, liver diseases, liver inflammation, kidney diseases, normal weight, regular diet, optimum sleeping time(7-8 hours), regular health examination and health behavior practice group. Major findings of the study are as follows:
    1)Analysis of self-perceived health status and health behavior by disease :
    Variables significantly correlated with high self-perceived health status have strong associations with high health behavior practice, which supports the hypothesis that as one has high self-perceived health status, one is more likely to practice health promoting behavior.
    The results of analysis of health behavior differences by dividing subjects into two categories, 'cases of illness' and 'cases of no illness' indicate that drinking, sleeping time, health examination are significant variables (p<0.001, 0.05) whereas smoking, weight control, regular exercise, regular diet are not significant.
    2)Analysis of disparity patterns between self-perceived health status and health examination :
    The hypothesis that health behaviors would be different according to the disparity pattern between self-perceived health status and health examination is supported as a result of χ2 test. Among
    Type I : Self-perceived health status is high and actual health status is good (no disease)
    Type II : Self-perceived health status is high and actual health status is poor(have disease)
    Type III : Self-perceived health status is low and actual health status is good(no disease)
    Type IV : Self-perceived health status is low and actual health status is poor(have disease)
    Type I and Type IV show no disparity, Type I shows the highest health promoting behavior whereas Type IV shows the lowest health promoting behavior Type II, and III, compared to Type I, practise lower health promoting behavior Multi-logistics regression analysis was conducted to find out the degree of impact on health behavior. Independent variables are goneral characteristics, self-perceived health status and health examination result and presence of illness, while the dependent variable is health promoting behavior.
    The analysis of the impact of self-perceived health status on the health promoting behavior shows that smoking, drinking, weight control, regular exercise, health examination practice, and/or regular diet are significantly correlated to self-perceived health status, High self-perceived health status is inversely related to high health promoting behavior. This finding supports the hypothesis that the higher one perceives one's health, the more likely one is to practice health promoting behavior. On the contrary, the presence of illness has little impact on health promoting behavior.
    3)Multiple logistics analysis on how disparity patterns between self-perceived health status and health examination affect health behavior :
    The results of multiple logistics analysis made on health behavior variables compared to the standard variable are as follows: When analyzed on the standard of Type I, smoking is a significant risk factor for the Type IV. In case of drinking, all the patterns show a high probability of relative task ratio. With regard to weight control, it is a risk factor for Type II while all the patterns show high probability of not practising when analyzed on the standard of type IV.Type III and IV show high probability of not doing regular exercise while Type IV, shows a high probability of not taking appropriate sleeping time. When analyzed on the standard of type IV, all the patterns show a high probability of not taking health examinations. Type III and IV show a high probability of not having regular meals. As for overall health promoting behavior, Type III and IV show a high relative risk ratio. These two groups have low self-perceived health status. It implies that self-perceived health status has significant impact on health promoting behavior. This is also supported by the fact that Type I with high self-perceived health status and no illness shows a high practice rate of health promoting behavior. Types II and III the groups with high disparity between self-perceived health status and health examination results, show a low practice rate of health promoting behavior when compared to Type I. Type IV, that is the group with low self-perceived health status and actual illness, shows the lowest practice of health promoting behavior. It is highly probable that this type proves to be the poorest health group.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to analyze health behavior by comparing the difference between self-perceived health status and health examination results. The study subjects consist of 7,702 people aged over 20, surveyed by Health Interview survey, Heal...

    The purpose of this study is to analyze health behavior by comparing the difference between self-perceived health status and health examination results. The study subjects consist of 7,702 people aged over 20, surveyed by Health Interview survey, Health Examination survey, Dietary Life survey, Health Consciousness and Behavior survey Data used in the study are drawn from raw data from a 1998 National Health and Nutrition survey.
    Goneral characteristics variables are sex, age, education level, residential area, marital status, occupation, and living standard while dichotomous variables, 'not healthy' and 'healthy' are used to measure self-perceived health status. Variables for health examination results are high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, liver diseases, liver inflammation, kidney diseases, normal weight, regular diet, optimum sleeping time(7-8 hours), regular health examination and health behavior practice group. Major findings of the study are as follows:
    1)Analysis of self-perceived health status and health behavior by disease :
    Variables significantly correlated with high self-perceived health status have strong associations with high health behavior practice, which supports the hypothesis that as one has high self-perceived health status, one is more likely to practice health promoting behavior.
    The results of analysis of health behavior differences by dividing subjects into two categories, 'cases of illness' and 'cases of no illness' indicate that drinking, sleeping time, health examination are significant variables (p<0.001, 0.05) whereas smoking, weight control, regular exercise, regular diet are not significant.
    2)Analysis of disparity patterns between self-perceived health status and health examination :
    The hypothesis that health behaviors would be different according to the disparity pattern between self-perceived health status and health examination is supported as a result of χ2 test. Among
    Type I : Self-perceived health status is high and actual health status is good (no disease)
    Type II : Self-perceived health status is high and actual health status is poor(have disease)
    Type III : Self-perceived health status is low and actual health status is good(no disease)
    Type IV : Self-perceived health status is low and actual health status is poor(have disease)
    Type I and Type IV show no disparity, Type I shows the highest health promoting behavior whereas Type IV shows the lowest health promoting behavior Type II, and III, compared to Type I, practise lower health promoting behavior Multi-logistics regression analysis was conducted to find out the degree of impact on health behavior. Independent variables are goneral characteristics, self-perceived health status and health examination result and presence of illness, while the dependent variable is health promoting behavior.
    The analysis of the impact of self-perceived health status on the health promoting behavior shows that smoking, drinking, weight control, regular exercise, health examination practice, and/or regular diet are significantly correlated to self-perceived health status, High self-perceived health status is inversely related to high health promoting behavior. This finding supports the hypothesis that the higher one perceives one's health, the more likely one is to practice health promoting behavior. On the contrary, the presence of illness has little impact on health promoting behavior.
    3)Multiple logistics analysis on how disparity patterns between self-perceived health status and health examination affect health behavior :
    The results of multiple logistics analysis made on health behavior variables compared to the standard variable are as follows: When analyzed on the standard of Type I, smoking is a significant risk factor for the Type IV. In case of drinking, all the patterns show a high probability of relative task ratio. With regard to weight control, it is a risk factor for Type II while all the patterns show high probability of not practising when analyzed on the standard of type IV.Type III and IV show high probability of not doing regular exercise while Type IV, shows a high probability of not taking appropriate sleeping time. When analyzed on the standard of type IV, all the patterns show a high probability of not taking health examinations. Type III and IV show a high probability of not having regular meals. As for overall health promoting behavior, Type III and IV show a high relative risk ratio. These two groups have low self-perceived health status. It implies that self-perceived health status has significant impact on health promoting behavior. This is also supported by the fact that Type I with high self-perceived health status and no illness shows a high practice rate of health promoting behavior. Types II and III the groups with high disparity between self-perceived health status and health examination results, show a low practice rate of health promoting behavior when compared to Type I. Type IV, that is the group with low self-perceived health status and actual illness, shows the lowest practice of health promoting behavior. It is highly probable that this type proves to be the poorest health group.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ.연구의 배경 및 필요성
    • Ⅱ.연구의 목적
    • Ⅲ.연구의 방법
    • Ⅳ.분석결과
    • Ⅴ.고찰
    • Ⅰ.연구의 배경 및 필요성
    • Ⅱ.연구의 목적
    • Ⅲ.연구의 방법
    • Ⅳ.분석결과
    • Ⅴ.고찰
    • Ⅵ.요약 및 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2012-05-22 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국보건교육·건강증진학회 -> 한국보건교육건강증진학회
    영문명 : Journal Of Korean Society For Health Education And Promotion -> Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion
    KCI등재
    2012-05-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 보건교육·건강증진학회지 -> 보건교육건강증진학회지
    외국어명 : JOURNAL OF KOREAN SOCIETY FOR HEALTH EDUCATION AND PROMOTION -> KOREAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH EDUCATION AND PROMOTION
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-12-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국보건교육ㆍ건강증진학회 -> 한국보건교육·건강증진학회 KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-11 학술지명변경 한글명 : 보건교육건강증진학회지 -> 보건교육·건강증진학회지 KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.97 0.97 1.01
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.02 1.11 1.349 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼