RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    지방정부간 분쟁조정과정에 관한 협상론적 분석 = Negotiation Theory and Its Application to Dispute Resolution among Local Governments

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30066460

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper aims at applying negotiation theory to conflict resolution among local governments. It analyzes three conflict cases with ac focus on four factors which are considered to influence the negotiation process. The four factors are type and strategy of n negotiation, rules of negotiation process, relationship of parties, and institutional and environmental variables. The analysis of the cases leads to the following conclusions. First, the parties participating in the negotiation process would benefit from changing their negotiation strategies from distributional to integrative ones. Also, they should discard a positional negotiation strategy and adopt a principled negotiation strategy which is based on objective criteria and rules. Second, the negotiating parties should take advantage of the issue-splitting strategy if they are in a complex situation where several issues are mixed and interrelated. That is, they should first agree on the general principles before they discuss more specific and more interest-centered issues. Third, negotiating parties should pay attention to mobilization of informational resources (rather than political resources) in order to build trust and good relations among themselves and enhance their own negotiation power. Also, they should try to make themselves understood by each other by making a partnership for research and investigation in the process of resolving conflicts and negotiating their interests.
    번역하기

    This paper aims at applying negotiation theory to conflict resolution among local governments. It analyzes three conflict cases with ac focus on four factors which are considered to influence the negotiation process. The four factors are type and stra...

    This paper aims at applying negotiation theory to conflict resolution among local governments. It analyzes three conflict cases with ac focus on four factors which are considered to influence the negotiation process. The four factors are type and strategy of n negotiation, rules of negotiation process, relationship of parties, and institutional and environmental variables. The analysis of the cases leads to the following conclusions. First, the parties participating in the negotiation process would benefit from changing their negotiation strategies from distributional to integrative ones. Also, they should discard a positional negotiation strategy and adopt a principled negotiation strategy which is based on objective criteria and rules. Second, the negotiating parties should take advantage of the issue-splitting strategy if they are in a complex situation where several issues are mixed and interrelated. That is, they should first agree on the general principles before they discuss more specific and more interest-centered issues. Third, negotiating parties should pay attention to mobilization of informational resources (rather than political resources) in order to build trust and good relations among themselves and enhance their own negotiation power. Also, they should try to make themselves understood by each other by making a partnership for research and investigation in the process of resolving conflicts and negotiating their interests.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.82 1.82 1.97
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.98 2.13 2.164 0.32
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼