RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    관찰연구에서 질적 접근과 양적 접근의 불가공약성 = The Incommensurability of Quantitative and Qualitative Approach in Observation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30057653

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Quantitative and qualitative approach both can be used in observational research. So many people has used them in mixed form. The results of uses of mixed form cause to deteriorate the meaning of each research paradigm. And there are some researchers to think that we can understand the object more clearly and distinctly by use of mixed form-eclectic form. The eclectic form can be used to solve the practical problems because solving the problem is the focus of the practical. But the understanding or interpretation of the object are different from the practical. Only when there is commensuration among the research paradigms, they can be unified in one research. The purpose of this research is to reveal the incommensurability between the quantitative and qualitative observation. First, two research paradigms are different in view of world. The quantitative observation presupposes the objective world, but the qualitative observation presupposes the subjective world, Second, two research paradigms are different in view of the reality. The quantitative observation presupposes the unchanging nature of the reality, but qualitative observation presupposes that changing is reality. Third, two research paradigms are different in ways to approach to reality. The quantitative observation adopts analysis and classification as the way to reality, but qualitative observation adopts analysis and abstraction as the way to meaning. The datum from two research paradigms are different in the quality and there is any commensurability between two research paradigms. So two paradigms can net be used in mixed form. Researchers must select to reflect fully the purposes of their research.
    번역하기

    Quantitative and qualitative approach both can be used in observational research. So many people has used them in mixed form. The results of uses of mixed form cause to deteriorate the meaning of each research paradigm. And there are some researchers ...

    Quantitative and qualitative approach both can be used in observational research. So many people has used them in mixed form. The results of uses of mixed form cause to deteriorate the meaning of each research paradigm. And there are some researchers to think that we can understand the object more clearly and distinctly by use of mixed form-eclectic form. The eclectic form can be used to solve the practical problems because solving the problem is the focus of the practical. But the understanding or interpretation of the object are different from the practical. Only when there is commensuration among the research paradigms, they can be unified in one research. The purpose of this research is to reveal the incommensurability between the quantitative and qualitative observation. First, two research paradigms are different in view of world. The quantitative observation presupposes the objective world, but the qualitative observation presupposes the subjective world, Second, two research paradigms are different in view of the reality. The quantitative observation presupposes the unchanging nature of the reality, but qualitative observation presupposes that changing is reality. Third, two research paradigms are different in ways to approach to reality. The quantitative observation adopts analysis and classification as the way to reality, but qualitative observation adopts analysis and abstraction as the way to meaning. The datum from two research paradigms are different in the quality and there is any commensurability between two research paradigms. So two paradigms can net be used in mixed form. Researchers must select to reflect fully the purposes of their research.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.84 1.84 1.82
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.82 1.8 2.264 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼