RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    교사 평가의 문제점과 개선 방안 연구 = A Study on Problems and Ways to Make Better of the Teacher Appraisal System

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30057644

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of the study was to find problems and implications to make better of the teacher appraisal system in Korea. In these days, performance appraisal is regarded as a matter of course, and almost no one is indifferent to it. Also, performance appraisal become more and more important because staff management is an key point in success of organizational management and it provide basic information on staff management. Performance appraisal is done almost all organizations, whether they are formal or informal, and all members in the organization profit or loss by the appraisal. In schools, however, the effect of teacher appraisal is not limited to teachers. It is because that well-planned and performed appraisal system results in quality improvement in instruction, and it directly influence on parents and students, too. In spite of the importance of the appraisal system, there are many problems and negative perspectives on it in Korea. Namely, it is said that the system does not contribute to rational staff management and professional development of teachers. Based on teacher appraisal system in Texas and NBPTS in the U.S., the study described the teacher appraisal system in both country and analyzed the problems in appraisal system in Korea. The result suggests that there needs to be made changes in the purpose of the appraisal. In Korea, the appraisal system if focused on promotion and transfer of teachers, but to be a developmental appraisal, it should be emphasized on the other side of appraisal system, which give opportunities for teachers to make quality improvement and professional development. Second, currently the result of the teacher appraisal does not open to the public so that it results in many problems in schools, thus, the result should be open to the public to give them feedback and the opportunities for professional development and improving their instruction. Third, new criteria or standards should be made to be a objective and developmental appraisal which based on various criteria and opinions of teachers, not based on the subjectivity of an appraiser or unclear standards. Fourth, teacher appraisal system should be based on absolute evaluation, not relative evaluation which does not give informations on actual performance of teachers. Because absolute evaluation can give informations on actual performance of teachers, it may reduce the unnecessary competition and negative effects among teachers, and can give each teachers feedbacks on what is necessary to improve instruction or professional development, etc. Fifth, with the importance of the standards and criteria of the evaluation, the role of the appraiser is also important. Thus, with continuous training and efforts, appraisers should try to increase their ability and quality for effective appraisal.
    번역하기

    The purpose of the study was to find problems and implications to make better of the teacher appraisal system in Korea. In these days, performance appraisal is regarded as a matter of course, and almost no one is indifferent to it. Also, performance a...

    The purpose of the study was to find problems and implications to make better of the teacher appraisal system in Korea. In these days, performance appraisal is regarded as a matter of course, and almost no one is indifferent to it. Also, performance appraisal become more and more important because staff management is an key point in success of organizational management and it provide basic information on staff management. Performance appraisal is done almost all organizations, whether they are formal or informal, and all members in the organization profit or loss by the appraisal. In schools, however, the effect of teacher appraisal is not limited to teachers. It is because that well-planned and performed appraisal system results in quality improvement in instruction, and it directly influence on parents and students, too. In spite of the importance of the appraisal system, there are many problems and negative perspectives on it in Korea. Namely, it is said that the system does not contribute to rational staff management and professional development of teachers. Based on teacher appraisal system in Texas and NBPTS in the U.S., the study described the teacher appraisal system in both country and analyzed the problems in appraisal system in Korea. The result suggests that there needs to be made changes in the purpose of the appraisal. In Korea, the appraisal system if focused on promotion and transfer of teachers, but to be a developmental appraisal, it should be emphasized on the other side of appraisal system, which give opportunities for teachers to make quality improvement and professional development. Second, currently the result of the teacher appraisal does not open to the public so that it results in many problems in schools, thus, the result should be open to the public to give them feedback and the opportunities for professional development and improving their instruction. Third, new criteria or standards should be made to be a objective and developmental appraisal which based on various criteria and opinions of teachers, not based on the subjectivity of an appraiser or unclear standards. Fourth, teacher appraisal system should be based on absolute evaluation, not relative evaluation which does not give informations on actual performance of teachers. Because absolute evaluation can give informations on actual performance of teachers, it may reduce the unnecessary competition and negative effects among teachers, and can give each teachers feedbacks on what is necessary to improve instruction or professional development, etc. Fifth, with the importance of the standards and criteria of the evaluation, the role of the appraiser is also important. Thus, with continuous training and efforts, appraisers should try to increase their ability and quality for effective appraisal.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.84 1.84 1.82
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.82 1.8 2.264 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼