RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    교육에서의 규범성 연구 = A Study on Normativity in Education

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75396662

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Normativity in Education is a precondition of educational activities, for education is value-laden. But the criteria of norms function for inclusion and exclusion of certain activity in all educational practices, which can be called as a practice of nomalization. Though it is inevitable to accept certain norms for continuity of society and conservation of traditional values, the practice of normalization can be regarded as practice of power-knowledge to limit the mind and actions of a person. The technology of normalization covers all steps that compare, divide, rank, evaluate his actions. The establishment of normative category on sanity/insanity may contribute to strengthening the current power relations. For example, autonomy, a normative aim of education, is based on the commonality and universality of self. But this essential view about the construction of self disregards the fact that autonomy is context-laden; that is, there is no rational transparent autonomy that liberalists claim when considered in the power-knowledge nexus. But even if all norms operate as normalization in power-knowledge nexus, and they can be used as a tool of oppression, the precondition, statement, practice of norm are required, as education is a normative activity. In case of the absence of normative preconditon in educational discourse, we can not discuss the educational affairs, for there is no positive foundation for critical exploration In sum, we should not focus on the acceptance of the universal norms and principles without doubt, but attend to the modes of practice of normalization in every steps in educational practices.
    번역하기

    Normativity in Education is a precondition of educational activities, for education is value-laden. But the criteria of norms function for inclusion and exclusion of certain activity in all educational practices, which can be called as a practice of ...

    Normativity in Education is a precondition of educational activities, for education is value-laden. But the criteria of norms function for inclusion and exclusion of certain activity in all educational practices, which can be called as a practice of nomalization. Though it is inevitable to accept certain norms for continuity of society and conservation of traditional values, the practice of normalization can be regarded as practice of power-knowledge to limit the mind and actions of a person. The technology of normalization covers all steps that compare, divide, rank, evaluate his actions. The establishment of normative category on sanity/insanity may contribute to strengthening the current power relations. For example, autonomy, a normative aim of education, is based on the commonality and universality of self. But this essential view about the construction of self disregards the fact that autonomy is context-laden; that is, there is no rational transparent autonomy that liberalists claim when considered in the power-knowledge nexus. But even if all norms operate as normalization in power-knowledge nexus, and they can be used as a tool of oppression, the precondition, statement, practice of norm are required, as education is a normative activity. In case of the absence of normative preconditon in educational discourse, we can not discuss the educational affairs, for there is no positive foundation for critical exploration In sum, we should not focus on the acceptance of the universal norms and principles without doubt, but attend to the modes of practice of normalization in every steps in educational practices.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-09 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Philosophy of Education KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.55 0.55 0.59
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.54 0.61 0.998 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼