RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    조직내 생산중심성과 남성중심성의 관계에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Relations between the Production-Centrality and Male-Centrality in the Organization

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2096390

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Considering the fast that most career women's experience involves both the productive and the reproductive spheres, and that they take charge of the dual roles, close attention should be paid as to how the production- centered goal, value and evaluating standards of the organization interwined the gendered practices and structure. Especially, empirical examination of the formal organization seems to be very important, because in modern capitalist society, the formal organization is the key locus where the gender rotation can be reformulated, constructing the discourses oil the masculinity/femininity and qualifications of ideal laborer.
    On the basis of the empirical research, this dissertation offers the following out comes.
    Firstly, the goal and evaluation standards of the organization continue to be formed by articulating masculinity for enhancing efficiency and productivity. This defining process regards the men solely as capable, and desirable laborers and therefore justifies exclusion and devaluation of women.
    Secondly, when the amount of working hours is considered as the index of worker's devotion to the organization, only men and exceptionally few women can be defined as good laborers. Because they are exempt from the reproductive roles and can mobilize other people(mainly, wives)'s support.
    Thirdly, often managers of the organization utilize the male homosociality with intent to reduce the uncertainty and increase the productivity and efficiency. So existing male homosociality has become men's organizational assets, reconsolidating male centrality of the organization.
    Fourthly, managers sometimes prefer women to men for increasing productivity, which leads to the sex- ratio of the organization more balanced. The positive impact of this situation on gender relations, however, is often curtailed by the nature of the production-centrality of the organization.
    Fifthly, according to my empirical research, the possibility of gender equality may be increased where the sex-ratio of the organization become more balanced and the organizational goal and practices are less profit-oriented. But each positive characteristics has its own limitations due to its partiality. Even organization which provides more favorable conditions for women is subject to be deevaluated in a wider social context still pursuing male centered efficiency.
    And finally, to try to overcome this situation and to promote the gender equality, organization should be changed to reconsider the reproduction and to provide opportunities for men and women to share the reproductive responsibility. But for this, the competitive production-centered goal and evaluation standards of the organization should be reexamined. In addition, reconcep4ualization of the efficiency and productivity is needed.
    번역하기

    Considering the fast that most career women's experience involves both the productive and the reproductive spheres, and that they take charge of the dual roles, close attention should be paid as to how the production- centered goal, value and evaluati...

    Considering the fast that most career women's experience involves both the productive and the reproductive spheres, and that they take charge of the dual roles, close attention should be paid as to how the production- centered goal, value and evaluating standards of the organization interwined the gendered practices and structure. Especially, empirical examination of the formal organization seems to be very important, because in modern capitalist society, the formal organization is the key locus where the gender rotation can be reformulated, constructing the discourses oil the masculinity/femininity and qualifications of ideal laborer.
    On the basis of the empirical research, this dissertation offers the following out comes.
    Firstly, the goal and evaluation standards of the organization continue to be formed by articulating masculinity for enhancing efficiency and productivity. This defining process regards the men solely as capable, and desirable laborers and therefore justifies exclusion and devaluation of women.
    Secondly, when the amount of working hours is considered as the index of worker's devotion to the organization, only men and exceptionally few women can be defined as good laborers. Because they are exempt from the reproductive roles and can mobilize other people(mainly, wives)'s support.
    Thirdly, often managers of the organization utilize the male homosociality with intent to reduce the uncertainty and increase the productivity and efficiency. So existing male homosociality has become men's organizational assets, reconsolidating male centrality of the organization.
    Fourthly, managers sometimes prefer women to men for increasing productivity, which leads to the sex- ratio of the organization more balanced. The positive impact of this situation on gender relations, however, is often curtailed by the nature of the production-centrality of the organization.
    Fifthly, according to my empirical research, the possibility of gender equality may be increased where the sex-ratio of the organization become more balanced and the organizational goal and practices are less profit-oriented. But each positive characteristics has its own limitations due to its partiality. Even organization which provides more favorable conditions for women is subject to be deevaluated in a wider social context still pursuing male centered efficiency.
    And finally, to try to overcome this situation and to promote the gender equality, organization should be changed to reconsider the reproduction and to provide opportunities for men and women to share the reproductive responsibility. But for this, the competitive production-centered goal and evaluation standards of the organization should be reexamined. In addition, reconcep4ualization of the efficiency and productivity is needed.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 논의의 배경
    • 1. 여성과 조직내 성별관계에 관한 이론적 논의
    • 2. 연구내용과 방법
    • Ⅲ. 조직의 생산중심성과 남성중심성
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 논의의 배경
    • 1. 여성과 조직내 성별관계에 관한 이론적 논의
    • 2. 연구내용과 방법
    • Ⅲ. 조직의 생산중심성과 남성중심성
    • 1. 생산중심성과 성별화된 능력
    • 2. 조직에 대한 헌신의 요구와 재생산
    • 3. 남성적 유대(Homsociality)와 조직문화
    • Ⅳ. 맺는말
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼