RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    인간발달의 교육적 조망 = Human Development on Educational Perspective

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2057922

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study was aimed to show that the discussion on human development in educational settings should be primarily based on the perspective of education and to search for a "educational" theory of human development.
    Here, the term of "educational" was stood for "being able to offer legitimate and useful implications for educational practice", namely "most interesting to educators".
    Educators are primarily intersted in knowing what things should be taught ("taught" in the sense that implies "learned"), by what methods, at what stages during by a person's educational development in order to produce a particular kind of educated person.
    By the way, the traditional suggestions about such educators' interests to student development were made mainly in the psychological perspectives. But there is a gulf between psychological theories and educational practice. The former concerns the problem of describing what it is, but the latter the problem of prescribing what ought to be. Educators are not trying to describe a process of development in a value-free way;
    they are trying to prescribe the best way of actualizing a range of preffered potentials. And in educational context the end-product is a kind of person, but in Piaget's developmental psychological theory it is a kind of thinking. Consequently, educational practice can not be reduced to psychological theories.
    Therefore, I think that the notion that one can move, however cautiously, along a line of implication from psychological theories to educational practice is mistaken, and is in practice damaging to education. In these contexts, I think that Egan's thory of educational development can give direct, important, useful, and legitimate implications to educators.
    번역하기

    This study was aimed to show that the discussion on human development in educational settings should be primarily based on the perspective of education and to search for a "educational" theory of human development. Here, the term of "e...

    This study was aimed to show that the discussion on human development in educational settings should be primarily based on the perspective of education and to search for a "educational" theory of human development.
    Here, the term of "educational" was stood for "being able to offer legitimate and useful implications for educational practice", namely "most interesting to educators".
    Educators are primarily intersted in knowing what things should be taught ("taught" in the sense that implies "learned"), by what methods, at what stages during by a person's educational development in order to produce a particular kind of educated person.
    By the way, the traditional suggestions about such educators' interests to student development were made mainly in the psychological perspectives. But there is a gulf between psychological theories and educational practice. The former concerns the problem of describing what it is, but the latter the problem of prescribing what ought to be. Educators are not trying to describe a process of development in a value-free way;
    they are trying to prescribe the best way of actualizing a range of preffered potentials. And in educational context the end-product is a kind of person, but in Piaget's developmental psychological theory it is a kind of thinking. Consequently, educational practice can not be reduced to psychological theories.
    Therefore, I think that the notion that one can move, however cautiously, along a line of implication from psychological theories to educational practice is mistaken, and is in practice damaging to education. In these contexts, I think that Egan's thory of educational development can give direct, important, useful, and legitimate implications to educators.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1.문제의 제기
    • 2."교육적"의 의미
    • 3.교육과 심리학의 관계
    • 4.심리학적 발달이론
    • 5.교육적 발달이론
    • 1.문제의 제기
    • 2."교육적"의 의미
    • 3.교육과 심리학의 관계
    • 4.심리학적 발달이론
    • 5.교육적 발달이론
    • 6.맺는 말
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼