RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    硏究開發 프로젝트 選定評價模型에 관한 硏究  :  水産公共硏究機關의 硏究開發事業을 중심으로 = A Study on the Evaluation Models for the R & D Project Selection

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2055647

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper aims to examine and analyze the merits and demerits of the existing evaluation models and to contribute to the practical applications of the evaluation models appropriate to both business and public organization.
    This study classifies the existing models into four categories based on the criteria as follows ; 1) the characteristics of the model ; 2) the stepwise decision making ; 3) the ovjective ; 4) the development process.
    Furthermore, these models are divided into the following groups on the basis of the evaluation purpose ; 1) the screening model ; 2) the prioritizing model ; 3) the resource allocation model ; 4) the compound application model.
    This study is to study and aggregation model which enables the project manager to make a rational decision in project selection. The aggregation model is divided into sub-models according to the evaluation objects ; DAHS, DAHP, and DAHR model.
    DAHS model is for the screening of the proposed projects by using scoring methods based on Delphi and AHP methods. This sub-model is appropriate for eliminating the most undesirable from further consideration.
    DAHP model is for prioritizing the screened candidates. For the measure of goodness, the priority vectors are calculated (or generated) using AHP and Delphi method.
    DAHR model is studied by this paper for the R/D resource allocation using LP and 0-1 programming. This sub-model uses a utility value calculated by the priority vectors.
    The aggregation model is applied to the evaluation of a public research institute projects with a series of real data.
    Several conclusions are drawn from the analysis and evaluation of the projects. The DAHS model solves the problems posed by the subjectivity in determination of evaluating factors and their weights, which prevails in existing evaluation models. The priority of R & D project is decided by the of DAHP model, which makes mutual comparisions of the concerned elements. Therefore DAHP model is considered to be more rational than the existing ones. DAHR model helps to distribute the R & D resources effectively by means of LP and 0-1 programings using priority vector.
    The application of the priority vector for LP and 0-1 programmings according to partial or total implementation eases much of difficulties in computing the extent of contribution.
    Especially proposed model is known the be appropriate to eliminate the factors of subjective evaluation.
    In conclusion, proposed model is considered to be useful in practically serving the purpose of evaluation R & D projects for both business and public organizations.
    번역하기

    This paper aims to examine and analyze the merits and demerits of the existing evaluation models and to contribute to the practical applications of the evaluation models appropriate to both business and public organization. This study classifies the...

    This paper aims to examine and analyze the merits and demerits of the existing evaluation models and to contribute to the practical applications of the evaluation models appropriate to both business and public organization.
    This study classifies the existing models into four categories based on the criteria as follows ; 1) the characteristics of the model ; 2) the stepwise decision making ; 3) the ovjective ; 4) the development process.
    Furthermore, these models are divided into the following groups on the basis of the evaluation purpose ; 1) the screening model ; 2) the prioritizing model ; 3) the resource allocation model ; 4) the compound application model.
    This study is to study and aggregation model which enables the project manager to make a rational decision in project selection. The aggregation model is divided into sub-models according to the evaluation objects ; DAHS, DAHP, and DAHR model.
    DAHS model is for the screening of the proposed projects by using scoring methods based on Delphi and AHP methods. This sub-model is appropriate for eliminating the most undesirable from further consideration.
    DAHP model is for prioritizing the screened candidates. For the measure of goodness, the priority vectors are calculated (or generated) using AHP and Delphi method.
    DAHR model is studied by this paper for the R/D resource allocation using LP and 0-1 programming. This sub-model uses a utility value calculated by the priority vectors.
    The aggregation model is applied to the evaluation of a public research institute projects with a series of real data.
    Several conclusions are drawn from the analysis and evaluation of the projects. The DAHS model solves the problems posed by the subjectivity in determination of evaluating factors and their weights, which prevails in existing evaluation models. The priority of R & D project is decided by the of DAHP model, which makes mutual comparisions of the concerned elements. Therefore DAHP model is considered to be more rational than the existing ones. DAHR model helps to distribute the R & D resources effectively by means of LP and 0-1 programings using priority vector.
    The application of the priority vector for LP and 0-1 programmings according to partial or total implementation eases much of difficulties in computing the extent of contribution.
    Especially proposed model is known the be appropriate to eliminate the factors of subjective evaluation.
    In conclusion, proposed model is considered to be useful in practically serving the purpose of evaluation R & D projects for both business and public organizations.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 序 論
    • 1. 硏究의 目的
    • 2. 硏究의 方法과 範圍
    • 3. 硏究對象
    • Ⅱ. 硏究開發 프로젝트의 評價要素
    • Ⅰ. 序 論
    • 1. 硏究의 目的
    • 2. 硏究의 方法과 範圍
    • 3. 硏究對象
    • Ⅱ. 硏究開發 프로젝트의 評價要素
    • 1. 硏究開發 프로젝트의 特徵
    • 2. 硏究開發 프로젝트의 評價要素
    • Ⅲ. 硏究開發 프로젝트 評價模型의 分析
    • 1. 프로젝트 評價模型의 開發過程
    • 2. 旣存 評價模型의 分析
    • 3. 새로운 評價模型(統合模型)의 檢討
    • Ⅳ. 統合評價模型의 構成
    • 1. 델파이法
    • 2. AHP技法
    • 3. 統合評價模型
    • Ⅴ. 評價模型의 實證分析
    • 1. 對象硏究機關
    • 2. 統合評價模型의 適用
    • 3. 評價模型의 適用結果
    • Ⅵ. 結論
    • 英文要約
    • 參考文獻
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼