RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    도움행동의 동기적 이원성 = Two Sources of Helping Motivation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A1988342

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study supposed that motivation of helping would be different according to social and cultural background, that is, egoism or altruism. Based on difference of helping motivation, it was proposed that content of egoistic helping was fairness and content of altruistic helping was fraternity in which were social values. The nature of helping behavior were classified in term of these two different social values. Therefore, the previous results of helping research reilluminated based on conceptual framework proposed in this study. Also, it was understood previous findings of helping study conducted in different concern in terms of one meaningful framework.
    According discussion in this study, the limitations of previous helping research were discussed and were proposed further research.
    번역하기

    This study supposed that motivation of helping would be different according to social and cultural background, that is, egoism or altruism. Based on difference of helping motivation, it was proposed that content of egoistic helping was fairness and co...

    This study supposed that motivation of helping would be different according to social and cultural background, that is, egoism or altruism. Based on difference of helping motivation, it was proposed that content of egoistic helping was fairness and content of altruistic helping was fraternity in which were social values. The nature of helping behavior were classified in term of these two different social values. Therefore, the previous results of helping research reilluminated based on conceptual framework proposed in this study. Also, it was understood previous findings of helping study conducted in different concern in terms of one meaningful framework.
    According discussion in this study, the limitations of previous helping research were discussed and were proposed further research.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 도움 행동의 결정 요인
    • 1. 규범행동과 도움행동
    • 2. 손실-이득과 도움행동
    • 3. 공감과 도움행동
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 도움 행동의 결정 요인
    • 1. 규범행동과 도움행동
    • 2. 손실-이득과 도움행동
    • 3. 공감과 도움행동
    • 4. 정서와 도움행동
    • Ⅲ. 도움 행동의 이원성: 이기성과 이타성
    • 1. 도움 행동의 이기성과 이타성
    • 2. 이타적 도움과 이기적 도움의 내용
    • 3. 공정성과 도움행동과 인정성 도움행동의 특성
    • Ⅳ. 도움행동의 동기적 이원성의 의의
    • 1. 동기적 이원성과 선행연구
    • 2. 손실-이득 모형의 연구 결과
    • 3. 선행연구들의 제한성
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼