RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      교육정책집행의 이론모형 개발 및 적용에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Development and Application of a Theoretical Model for Educational Policy Implementation

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19690733

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Despite a great concern with various education policies on the part of people, educational groups, and educational policy makers, there has been rarely a study to systematically illuminate how the adopted education policies have been implemented in reality. For this reason, the present study aimed i) to delineate and design a theoretical model for educational policy implementation, and ii) with this, to seek means for successful implementation of education policies.
      For this purpose, various concepts, types, and systems concerning educational policy implementation, affecting factors, and practical educational policies were analyzed. As for the analytical framework, Ripley and Franklin's classification of distributive policy, competitive regulatory policy, protective regulatory policy, redistributive policy and Nakamura and Smallwood's classification of classical technocrats, instructed delegates, bargainers, discretionary experimenters, bureaucratic entrepreneur were consulted. And for the judgment of success or failure of implementation, policies such as high school equalization, self-governing system of education, and college accreditation system were, as cases, analyzed along the two criteria of contents and procedures. The result is as following.
      As for the policies of high school equalization and self-governing system of education, it can be said that it is not easy to conclude their success or failure in implementation, for the abstractness of their objectives, the subjectivity of satisfaction on the part of the affected, and their long-term effects.
      However, as for the college accreditation policy, it can be judged that successful policy implementation is under way, since its implementation can be evaluated according to both the qualitative and the quantitative criteria which were determined by Korean Council University Education.
      As conclusion, it is suggested that we need to look at carefully the changes in rank and file units of education, and that for more adaptable implementation, we need to elevate the abilities of those agencies in the uttermost front, above all. For this, trainings for these implementing agencies personnel need to be intensified.
      번역하기

      Despite a great concern with various education policies on the part of people, educational groups, and educational policy makers, there has been rarely a study to systematically illuminate how the adopted education policies have been implemented in re...

      Despite a great concern with various education policies on the part of people, educational groups, and educational policy makers, there has been rarely a study to systematically illuminate how the adopted education policies have been implemented in reality. For this reason, the present study aimed i) to delineate and design a theoretical model for educational policy implementation, and ii) with this, to seek means for successful implementation of education policies.
      For this purpose, various concepts, types, and systems concerning educational policy implementation, affecting factors, and practical educational policies were analyzed. As for the analytical framework, Ripley and Franklin's classification of distributive policy, competitive regulatory policy, protective regulatory policy, redistributive policy and Nakamura and Smallwood's classification of classical technocrats, instructed delegates, bargainers, discretionary experimenters, bureaucratic entrepreneur were consulted. And for the judgment of success or failure of implementation, policies such as high school equalization, self-governing system of education, and college accreditation system were, as cases, analyzed along the two criteria of contents and procedures. The result is as following.
      As for the policies of high school equalization and self-governing system of education, it can be said that it is not easy to conclude their success or failure in implementation, for the abstractness of their objectives, the subjectivity of satisfaction on the part of the affected, and their long-term effects.
      However, as for the college accreditation policy, it can be judged that successful policy implementation is under way, since its implementation can be evaluated according to both the qualitative and the quantitative criteria which were determined by Korean Council University Education.
      As conclusion, it is suggested that we need to look at carefully the changes in rank and file units of education, and that for more adaptable implementation, we need to elevate the abilities of those agencies in the uttermost front, above all. For this, trainings for these implementing agencies personnel need to be intensified.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 교육정책집행의 의의와 교육정책유형
      • Ⅲ. 교육정책집행의 체계화 판단기준
      • Ⅳ. 교육정책집행의 제 모형
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 교육정책집행의 의의와 교육정책유형
      • Ⅲ. 교육정책집행의 체계화 판단기준
      • Ⅳ. 교육정책집행의 제 모형
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      • 영문초록
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼