RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    하계 세미나 발표 : 한국 사회에 있어서 개혁 법제의 현황과 향후의 과제 : 의료형법적 규제영역으로서의 생식적 복제와 치료적 복제 = A Study on the Reproduction Cloning and Therapeutic Cloning in the field of Medical Criminal Law

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19679678

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The modem times has brought the possibility of human cloning to the brink of realization. Cloning methodologies can be differentiated into somatic nucleus cell transfer embryo splitting, and reproductive cloning and therapeutic cloning for the purposes of creation of human being. In particular, embryonic stem cell which can be differentiated into cell, tissue, and organ is increasingly becoming the focus of therapeutic cloning research. Some of the voices expressed against human cloning include the concern that the welfare and the freedom of the cloned humans can be invaded, that the modification of the traditional family structure centered around parents-children relationship can bring confusion to self-identity of the individual, that the reduction of the diversity of human genes can threaten the survival of the human race, and that cloning and modifying humans on as-need basis can manifest itself in the abusive eugenics practice. However, some advocates of human cloning justify human cloning as a right of reproduction. From the perspective of embryonic research, the arguments regarding the embryo center around two positions: one, that the embryo enjoys a person status from the time it is fertilized, and two, that the embryo enjoys a person status through a gradual progress. On the other hand, an issue remains as to whether the spare embryo and the cloned embryo should enjoy the same treatment. When looking at the researches performed at other countries, a consensus as to the ban on human cloning and creation of chimeras and hybrids between human and animal exists; however, as to the embryo-related researches, Japan and England tolerate by law the cloning of the embryo, and the United States passed a legislative initiative tolerating only the embryo researches for the purposes of the spare embryo. This research seeks to suggest the following. First, a strict ban on human cloning through creation of human being ; Second, a 14-day use restriction of embryo researches with medical applications; Third, restriction of embryo researches to only the spare embryo.
    번역하기

    The modem times has brought the possibility of human cloning to the brink of realization. Cloning methodologies can be differentiated into somatic nucleus cell transfer embryo splitting, and reproductive cloning and therapeutic cloning for the purpose...

    The modem times has brought the possibility of human cloning to the brink of realization. Cloning methodologies can be differentiated into somatic nucleus cell transfer embryo splitting, and reproductive cloning and therapeutic cloning for the purposes of creation of human being. In particular, embryonic stem cell which can be differentiated into cell, tissue, and organ is increasingly becoming the focus of therapeutic cloning research. Some of the voices expressed against human cloning include the concern that the welfare and the freedom of the cloned humans can be invaded, that the modification of the traditional family structure centered around parents-children relationship can bring confusion to self-identity of the individual, that the reduction of the diversity of human genes can threaten the survival of the human race, and that cloning and modifying humans on as-need basis can manifest itself in the abusive eugenics practice. However, some advocates of human cloning justify human cloning as a right of reproduction. From the perspective of embryonic research, the arguments regarding the embryo center around two positions: one, that the embryo enjoys a person status from the time it is fertilized, and two, that the embryo enjoys a person status through a gradual progress. On the other hand, an issue remains as to whether the spare embryo and the cloned embryo should enjoy the same treatment. When looking at the researches performed at other countries, a consensus as to the ban on human cloning and creation of chimeras and hybrids between human and animal exists; however, as to the embryo-related researches, Japan and England tolerate by law the cloning of the embryo, and the United States passed a legislative initiative tolerating only the embryo researches for the purposes of the spare embryo. This research seeks to suggest the following. First, a strict ban on human cloning through creation of human being ; Second, a 14-day use restriction of embryo researches with medical applications; Third, restriction of embryo researches to only the spare embryo.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼