RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      교과내용으로서의 실천적 지식에 대한 이해와 오해 - 과학과 실험 수업의 경우의 관점의 시사 - = Understandings and misunderstandings of practical knowledge as school knowledge - A reconsideration of demonstration of lessons in science classrooms -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19679278

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Teaching of practical knowledge is one of the most enduring claims for the authentic teaching method, and for teachers it remains as a practical matter of classroom lessons. The practical matter for teachers has to do with decision-making in the course of instruction concerning when the teaching for authentic learning would be. While educational studies have been comprehending practical knowledge that should be identified as the contents of school subjects, they find their pedagogical suggestions of practical knowledge as coherently supported repertoire for educational reform. This study pursues such problematic in demonstrations in science classroom lessons. In the science education field, an emphasis on the teaching of procedural knowledge brings into fore a mode of inquiry style learning, which has been supported by various theoretical backgrounds. While such a style of teaching has been coherently recommended in various forms of teaching model on the one hand, one the other hand a question which reflects a difficulty in implementing such a style of teaching seems to be never dismissed. One of the dissolutions of such a puzzle is to reconsider the social dimension of classroom lessons. When we take the social dimension in which classroom lessons are demonstrated into consideration, we can find a different view of teaching of inquiry learning. This study begins by closely examining the nature of the demonstration of lessons, which shows that the demonstration is not a demonstration of inquiry in which students watch and await unexpected outcomes, but a demonstration of lessons in which its interactional production shapes what participants see, talk about, hear, and thus what they do next. For the teacher, the task is to keep attuning what happens into what is supposed to teach. For students, the task is to find a coherence between what happens and what has been expected. Such a task is not so much discovery of conceptual principle nor objective phenomena as a discovery of the next step in the course of practical actions. Such a procedure of interactional production works as curriculum activity for teacher and students alike. The close description of the field shows the teaching of learning by doing in the mundane classroom practices.
      번역하기

      Teaching of practical knowledge is one of the most enduring claims for the authentic teaching method, and for teachers it remains as a practical matter of classroom lessons. The practical matter for teachers has to do with decision-making in the cours...

      Teaching of practical knowledge is one of the most enduring claims for the authentic teaching method, and for teachers it remains as a practical matter of classroom lessons. The practical matter for teachers has to do with decision-making in the course of instruction concerning when the teaching for authentic learning would be. While educational studies have been comprehending practical knowledge that should be identified as the contents of school subjects, they find their pedagogical suggestions of practical knowledge as coherently supported repertoire for educational reform. This study pursues such problematic in demonstrations in science classroom lessons. In the science education field, an emphasis on the teaching of procedural knowledge brings into fore a mode of inquiry style learning, which has been supported by various theoretical backgrounds. While such a style of teaching has been coherently recommended in various forms of teaching model on the one hand, one the other hand a question which reflects a difficulty in implementing such a style of teaching seems to be never dismissed. One of the dissolutions of such a puzzle is to reconsider the social dimension of classroom lessons. When we take the social dimension in which classroom lessons are demonstrated into consideration, we can find a different view of teaching of inquiry learning. This study begins by closely examining the nature of the demonstration of lessons, which shows that the demonstration is not a demonstration of inquiry in which students watch and await unexpected outcomes, but a demonstration of lessons in which its interactional production shapes what participants see, talk about, hear, and thus what they do next. For the teacher, the task is to keep attuning what happens into what is supposed to teach. For students, the task is to find a coherence between what happens and what has been expected. Such a task is not so much discovery of conceptual principle nor objective phenomena as a discovery of the next step in the course of practical actions. Such a procedure of interactional production works as curriculum activity for teacher and students alike. The close description of the field shows the teaching of learning by doing in the mundane classroom practices.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼