RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    정의적 학습양식과 교수학습내용영역의 관계 = A Study on the Relationship between Affective Learning Styles and Academic Studies

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19679267

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to find out the affective learning styles proper to each academic studies. The methods used in this study was a qualitative re-analysis of the prior research findings, made from 1980 to 2000, for the relationships between affective learning styles and academic studies, according to the presented conceptual model in this article. The following conclusions were drawn as the research results: First, appropriate learning styles are different according to the learner`s academic studies. In the language science, participative-observative-independent style would be more effective. In the natural science studies and social science studies participative-observative-independent style would be required in the basic science studies, but trial type would be required in sectional or practical science studies. In the engineering part studies and medial studies, participative-trial-independent style would be appropriate. Second, the affective element-type of participation(observation type, trial type) was the essential elements to determine appropriate affective learning styles for academic studies. The positive evaluation for every course was associated with participative type, and independent learning type, but these types couldn`t be the essential elements to identify the relationships between specific academic study and affective learning styles.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to find out the affective learning styles proper to each academic studies. The methods used in this study was a qualitative re-analysis of the prior research findings, made from 1980 to 2000, for the relationships between...

    The purpose of this study was to find out the affective learning styles proper to each academic studies. The methods used in this study was a qualitative re-analysis of the prior research findings, made from 1980 to 2000, for the relationships between affective learning styles and academic studies, according to the presented conceptual model in this article. The following conclusions were drawn as the research results: First, appropriate learning styles are different according to the learner`s academic studies. In the language science, participative-observative-independent style would be more effective. In the natural science studies and social science studies participative-observative-independent style would be required in the basic science studies, but trial type would be required in sectional or practical science studies. In the engineering part studies and medial studies, participative-trial-independent style would be appropriate. Second, the affective element-type of participation(observation type, trial type) was the essential elements to determine appropriate affective learning styles for academic studies. The positive evaluation for every course was associated with participative type, and independent learning type, but these types couldn`t be the essential elements to identify the relationships between specific academic study and affective learning styles.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-05-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Curriculum Studies KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 신청제한 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.81 2.81 2.75
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.65 2.69 3.561 0.48
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼