RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      유아교육과정의 패러다임 분석에 따른 교사교육과정의 탐구 = The Education for Teachers on Curricula Paradigm Analysis in the Early Childhood School

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19679264

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Often curriculum studies in early childhood education fail to recognize the curricular perspectives. For the field of early childhood education to be vital and significant, diverse views on curricula must be nurtured. In this article, I present curricular perspectives on early childhood education. By reviewing early childhood education and curriculum literatures according to their core epistemological and ethical assumptions and views on the concept of a curriculum, I identify four schools of thought: 1) idealists, who advocate that the aim of early childhood education is the unfolding of the child`s rationality; 2) developmentalists, who assert that a school task is to create the environment which enables a child to encounter and solve ever more complex and demanding problems; 3) empiricists, who view n early childhood curriculum as a series of specific educational content or objective to be attained; and 4) reconceptualists, who regard the curriculum as a tool for emancipating children, parents, and teachers from unequal and often unjust social orders. The purpose of this study as to investigate the significance of he teachers` thought processes as a resource for constructing curriculum of teacher education. To achieve this purpose, first we reviewed critically the behavioral perspective as the traditional paradigm in terms of their logical assumptions and practical results in teaching and teacher education. And then we scrutinized the studies which were related teachers` thought process. The behavioral perspective strove to enhance the teacher effectiveness. Therefore, much of the research on teaching and teacher education during 1970s singularly focused on teacher` overt behavior that correlate with, or gave a direct casual impact on student learning outcomes. These studies which are also called `process-product` paradigm were rooted in behavioral psychological theories and aimed to identify the best predictors of the criteria for teacher effectiveness, that is, the best effective teachers teaching behaviors. And the results of the studies were utilized as the resource for curriculum-making of teacher education. However, the recent cognitive psychological researches which are opposed to behavioral perspective assert that teacher behavior is substantially influenced and determined by teachers` thought processes. The thinking, planning, and decision-making of teachers constitute a large part of the psychological context of teaching.
      번역하기

      Often curriculum studies in early childhood education fail to recognize the curricular perspectives. For the field of early childhood education to be vital and significant, diverse views on curricula must be nurtured. In this article, I present curric...

      Often curriculum studies in early childhood education fail to recognize the curricular perspectives. For the field of early childhood education to be vital and significant, diverse views on curricula must be nurtured. In this article, I present curricular perspectives on early childhood education. By reviewing early childhood education and curriculum literatures according to their core epistemological and ethical assumptions and views on the concept of a curriculum, I identify four schools of thought: 1) idealists, who advocate that the aim of early childhood education is the unfolding of the child`s rationality; 2) developmentalists, who assert that a school task is to create the environment which enables a child to encounter and solve ever more complex and demanding problems; 3) empiricists, who view n early childhood curriculum as a series of specific educational content or objective to be attained; and 4) reconceptualists, who regard the curriculum as a tool for emancipating children, parents, and teachers from unequal and often unjust social orders. The purpose of this study as to investigate the significance of he teachers` thought processes as a resource for constructing curriculum of teacher education. To achieve this purpose, first we reviewed critically the behavioral perspective as the traditional paradigm in terms of their logical assumptions and practical results in teaching and teacher education. And then we scrutinized the studies which were related teachers` thought process. The behavioral perspective strove to enhance the teacher effectiveness. Therefore, much of the research on teaching and teacher education during 1970s singularly focused on teacher` overt behavior that correlate with, or gave a direct casual impact on student learning outcomes. These studies which are also called `process-product` paradigm were rooted in behavioral psychological theories and aimed to identify the best predictors of the criteria for teacher effectiveness, that is, the best effective teachers teaching behaviors. And the results of the studies were utilized as the resource for curriculum-making of teacher education. However, the recent cognitive psychological researches which are opposed to behavioral perspective assert that teacher behavior is substantially influenced and determined by teachers` thought processes. The thinking, planning, and decision-making of teachers constitute a large part of the psychological context of teaching.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Curriculum Studies KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.81 2.81 2.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.65 2.69 3.561 0.48
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼