RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    지식 생성 (生成) 교육을 위한 지식의 성격 분석 = Analysis of the Nature of Knowledge for the Knowledge Producing Education

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19679225

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The term of `knowledge` is regarded as the key-word in the knowledge based society in the 21 century. In this society, the most important value is put on the production of the new knowledge. Accordingly, enhancing the knowledge production ability rather than knowledge acquisition or application abilities became more important objective in school education. In the present paper, the nature of knowledge was analyzed to get implication on the directions of knowledge education which can bring about able men who can produce new knowledge. Those facts that knowledge is distinguished from information, that knowledge in basically divided into two forms such as `propositional knowledge` and `procedural knowledge`, that knowledge is composed of two parts of `elucidated part` and `tacit one`, that knowledge contains cognitive aspect as well as affective one, and that the activities of knowledge inquiry form an special type of structure were found to be the salient traits of knowledge. Based on these traits, seven guidelines were extracted for the knowledge education. Even though the present paper has some degree of value in that it provided some important guidelines for the knowledge production education, it bears some limitations. One is that the guidelines presented in the present paper are too general in nature to be directly applied to in the real classroom teaching situation. The other is that the nature of the knowledge was not analyzed in terms of the `type` or `domain`. Knowledge could be divided into by the type or domain, such as `natural-scientific knowledge` and `humane-social knowldege`, and the nature of these two types of knowledge would be different in some degree, which would demand different strategies for teaching these different kind of knowledge. Thus, these problems untouched in this paper need to be studied in the next study.
    번역하기

    The term of `knowledge` is regarded as the key-word in the knowledge based society in the 21 century. In this society, the most important value is put on the production of the new knowledge. Accordingly, enhancing the knowledge production ability rath...

    The term of `knowledge` is regarded as the key-word in the knowledge based society in the 21 century. In this society, the most important value is put on the production of the new knowledge. Accordingly, enhancing the knowledge production ability rather than knowledge acquisition or application abilities became more important objective in school education. In the present paper, the nature of knowledge was analyzed to get implication on the directions of knowledge education which can bring about able men who can produce new knowledge. Those facts that knowledge is distinguished from information, that knowledge in basically divided into two forms such as `propositional knowledge` and `procedural knowledge`, that knowledge is composed of two parts of `elucidated part` and `tacit one`, that knowledge contains cognitive aspect as well as affective one, and that the activities of knowledge inquiry form an special type of structure were found to be the salient traits of knowledge. Based on these traits, seven guidelines were extracted for the knowledge education. Even though the present paper has some degree of value in that it provided some important guidelines for the knowledge production education, it bears some limitations. One is that the guidelines presented in the present paper are too general in nature to be directly applied to in the real classroom teaching situation. The other is that the nature of the knowledge was not analyzed in terms of the `type` or `domain`. Knowledge could be divided into by the type or domain, such as `natural-scientific knowledge` and `humane-social knowldege`, and the nature of these two types of knowledge would be different in some degree, which would demand different strategies for teaching these different kind of knowledge. Thus, these problems untouched in this paper need to be studied in the next study.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼