RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    해석적 체험과 교육적 체험 = Hermeneutical Experience and Educative Experience

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19678932

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper argues that educatioanl theory should identify it`s own theoretical context focusing on the concept of `educative experience` itself. The identity crisis involoved in educational theory has been created by the passive methodological and conceptual reliance on other `mother` disciplines. One of the most conspicuous examples of such crisis is the multi-faceted disciplinary approach, called the `Reconceptualization` in the USA. Based on this critique of the current status of the field, this paper purports to gain a renewed understanding of the essence and nature of educative experience through critical comparison and contrast between H.-G. Gadamer`s concept of `hermeneutical experience` and Sang-ho Chang`s `educative experience.` Particulary, the latter is regarded as a central concept in his `Reconceptualization` of educational theory. The two forms of experience are assumed to be `commensurable` in that both of them deal with a number of fundamental issues such as `interactive understanding`, `dialectical process in communication`, and `validation of truth and knowledge`. An in-depth analysis of Gadamer`s concept of human experience in gereral in conjunction with his dialogical model and with Chang`s concept of educational dialogue model reveals that they share critical commonality in terms of epistemological perspective but, at the same time, differ from one another in the ontological structure of dialogue itself. The major themes considered for the analysis entail such issues as general feature of the structure of experience, the mode of human interaction involved in the experience, the object or purpose of experience, and the problem of medium or text in the interaction. In the final analysis, it is proposed that we need a more structured disciplinary attempt to bridge the conceptural gap between the ontological or historical dimension emphasized by Gadamer`s theory and the epistemological dimension of Chang`s theory, so that a renewed critical understanding of educative experience itself can emerge. More thorough and sophisticated studieds are necessary for the restructuring of educational theories that can overcome the epistemological, methodological impasse of the existing attempts for theorizing educational phenomena and that can harmonize the ontological dimension with the epistemological dimension.
    번역하기

    This paper argues that educatioanl theory should identify it`s own theoretical context focusing on the concept of `educative experience` itself. The identity crisis involoved in educational theory has been created by the passive methodological and con...

    This paper argues that educatioanl theory should identify it`s own theoretical context focusing on the concept of `educative experience` itself. The identity crisis involoved in educational theory has been created by the passive methodological and conceptual reliance on other `mother` disciplines. One of the most conspicuous examples of such crisis is the multi-faceted disciplinary approach, called the `Reconceptualization` in the USA. Based on this critique of the current status of the field, this paper purports to gain a renewed understanding of the essence and nature of educative experience through critical comparison and contrast between H.-G. Gadamer`s concept of `hermeneutical experience` and Sang-ho Chang`s `educative experience.` Particulary, the latter is regarded as a central concept in his `Reconceptualization` of educational theory. The two forms of experience are assumed to be `commensurable` in that both of them deal with a number of fundamental issues such as `interactive understanding`, `dialectical process in communication`, and `validation of truth and knowledge`. An in-depth analysis of Gadamer`s concept of human experience in gereral in conjunction with his dialogical model and with Chang`s concept of educational dialogue model reveals that they share critical commonality in terms of epistemological perspective but, at the same time, differ from one another in the ontological structure of dialogue itself. The major themes considered for the analysis entail such issues as general feature of the structure of experience, the mode of human interaction involved in the experience, the object or purpose of experience, and the problem of medium or text in the interaction. In the final analysis, it is proposed that we need a more structured disciplinary attempt to bridge the conceptural gap between the ontological or historical dimension emphasized by Gadamer`s theory and the epistemological dimension of Chang`s theory, so that a renewed critical understanding of educative experience itself can emerge. More thorough and sophisticated studieds are necessary for the restructuring of educational theories that can overcome the epistemological, methodological impasse of the existing attempts for theorizing educational phenomena and that can harmonize the ontological dimension with the epistemological dimension.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼