RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    교사의 사고과정의 성격과 근거 = The Nature of Teachers' Thinking Processes and the Knowledge Base for Teaching

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19678882

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper is an attempt to illustrate the processes of practical reasoning when teachers solve the practical problems, based on teachers` personal practical knowledge. Curriculum problems are practical prblems about choice about action, about what is to be done. For practical problems, the subject matter is assumed to be indefinitely changing from situation to situation as the conditions change. They are value questions since they involve judgments about what should be done. Practical reasoning is a strategy to respond to practical problems. Practical reasoning provides justifications for actions in those practical endeavours wherein exact knowledge did not seem possible. And it may be used to promote reflective practice and thus to improve teaching. Teachers have a special form of knowledge that arises from practice and develop a set of meanings and patterns for thought and action. The knowledge that teachers have about educational practice has the enormous potential power to inform practice. In short, the way teachers understand their world affects the way they structure classroom experience and interact with their students. To argue these points, this paper organized into three parts. The first section sets forth how the work on teacher-thinking has been evolved. Next, it is presented the nature of teachers` thinking processes and the relationship between teachr thought and pedagogical action. The final section illustrates what the sources and contents of the experienced teachers` presonal practical knowledge are. But we are still for from understanding what a language of practice is like and how teachers represent and utilize practical knowledge. Therefore, it is necessary to collcet, collate, and interpret the teachers` wisdom-of-practice through cases of the teacher` pedagogical reasoning and action.
    번역하기

    This paper is an attempt to illustrate the processes of practical reasoning when teachers solve the practical problems, based on teachers` personal practical knowledge. Curriculum problems are practical prblems about choice about action, about what ...

    This paper is an attempt to illustrate the processes of practical reasoning when teachers solve the practical problems, based on teachers` personal practical knowledge. Curriculum problems are practical prblems about choice about action, about what is to be done. For practical problems, the subject matter is assumed to be indefinitely changing from situation to situation as the conditions change. They are value questions since they involve judgments about what should be done. Practical reasoning is a strategy to respond to practical problems. Practical reasoning provides justifications for actions in those practical endeavours wherein exact knowledge did not seem possible. And it may be used to promote reflective practice and thus to improve teaching. Teachers have a special form of knowledge that arises from practice and develop a set of meanings and patterns for thought and action. The knowledge that teachers have about educational practice has the enormous potential power to inform practice. In short, the way teachers understand their world affects the way they structure classroom experience and interact with their students. To argue these points, this paper organized into three parts. The first section sets forth how the work on teacher-thinking has been evolved. Next, it is presented the nature of teachers` thinking processes and the relationship between teachr thought and pedagogical action. The final section illustrates what the sources and contents of the experienced teachers` presonal practical knowledge are. But we are still for from understanding what a language of practice is like and how teachers represent and utilize practical knowledge. Therefore, it is necessary to collcet, collate, and interpret the teachers` wisdom-of-practice through cases of the teacher` pedagogical reasoning and action.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼