RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    조건문의 담화적 기능 = On Discourse Functions of Conditionals

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19656386

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper addresses the functions of conditionals in actual discourse situations. It first argues for the importance of appropriate sampling to ensure unbiased interpretation of data. Thus this paper draws upon drama scripts, which is relatively free from shortcomings typically associated with spontaneous utterance data and yet reflects sufficient characteristics of colloquialit, as well as actual discourse transcripts. Conditionals in discourse texts largely function as a cohesive device between discourse units. Such device comprises of repetition, inversion and ellipsis. From a strict informativity perspective, repetition may be viewed as counter-effective. However, from an interactive perspective it may be viewed as a reinforcer- of information between the interlocuters. This has to do with the fact that repetition is more frequently used in colloquial texts rather than in literary texts. Inversion is typically employed when the speaker is seeking confirmation from the addressee or when the speaker is emotional, in which case more important information is uttered first to draw addressee`s sufficient attention to it. With regards to ellipsis, only the apodosis is subject to omission, where elided information is recoverable from the context, idiomaticity, inferences or encyclopedic knowledge. Coherence of the conditionals takes various forms, the typology of which is herein suggested. Relationship with the previous text can be grouped as affirmative acceptance, negative acceptance, and transition, which in turn are subground according to their coherence types; i.e. affirmative acceptance encompasses exposition, assumption, and exemplification; and negative acceptance encompasses contrast and suggestion. Thus the functions are presented in 6 categories and explicated individually. This paper aims at constituting a part of systematic investigation of conditionals in terms of their roles in textuality, discourse and grammar.
    번역하기

    This paper addresses the functions of conditionals in actual discourse situations. It first argues for the importance of appropriate sampling to ensure unbiased interpretation of data. Thus this paper draws upon drama scripts, which is relatively free...

    This paper addresses the functions of conditionals in actual discourse situations. It first argues for the importance of appropriate sampling to ensure unbiased interpretation of data. Thus this paper draws upon drama scripts, which is relatively free from shortcomings typically associated with spontaneous utterance data and yet reflects sufficient characteristics of colloquialit, as well as actual discourse transcripts. Conditionals in discourse texts largely function as a cohesive device between discourse units. Such device comprises of repetition, inversion and ellipsis. From a strict informativity perspective, repetition may be viewed as counter-effective. However, from an interactive perspective it may be viewed as a reinforcer- of information between the interlocuters. This has to do with the fact that repetition is more frequently used in colloquial texts rather than in literary texts. Inversion is typically employed when the speaker is seeking confirmation from the addressee or when the speaker is emotional, in which case more important information is uttered first to draw addressee`s sufficient attention to it. With regards to ellipsis, only the apodosis is subject to omission, where elided information is recoverable from the context, idiomaticity, inferences or encyclopedic knowledge. Coherence of the conditionals takes various forms, the typology of which is herein suggested. Relationship with the previous text can be grouped as affirmative acceptance, negative acceptance, and transition, which in turn are subground according to their coherence types; i.e. affirmative acceptance encompasses exposition, assumption, and exemplification; and negative acceptance encompasses contrast and suggestion. Thus the functions are presented in 6 categories and explicated individually. This paper aims at constituting a part of systematic investigation of conditionals in terms of their roles in textuality, discourse and grammar.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼