RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    敎育課程構成의 知識社會學的 分析 = An Analysis of Curriculum Construction by Sociology of Knowledge

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19645872

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The present study analized the social control of curriculum content to clarify the social factors through sociological theory and sociology of knowledge.
    In a theoretical approach, a consideration was taken into the curriculum concept, construction model process and sociology of knowledge. Traditional study of curriculum that considers knowledge as neutral and universal understands educational contents of school curriculum as taken for granted or neutral. So traditionalists focus on selecting and constructing knowledge which is usually considered a set of idealistic structures of philosophy, psychology, sociology to teach efficiently. They intended to find an efficient way of constructing contents or learing experience (-knowledge) to achieve a higher academic level. And these were treated as the tools of social class movement.
    However, all of the curriculum studies were neglecting the inter-relations between knowledge and society. The view of sociology of knowledge prescribes that curriculum content is made in socio-cultural conditions, and regards it as valid knowledge. They investigate the politically, socially organized curriculum that reproduce the social classes, and try to reveal why the lower class student must fail, through analyzing the code, social class, hegemony, decisin-making process, etc. The intention of dominant groups in society and nation's policy become the major factors in determining curriculum contents. By doing that curriculum mean transmission that stratifies the society. In this view-point, curriculum construction is the social and political decision-making process in which dominant "groups preserve their interest. And consider that the society is ineqal and thai the curriculum reproduces the inequality.
    The purpose of the present study is directing to the construction of curriculum through searching its sociality, social control, and social effects.
    Through the analysis of Korean curriculum(l963's and 1973's), it is found that curriculum contents which were selected and organized speak for the socio-cultural particularity.
    The results of analysis are as follows:
    First, there are inter-relations between selecting and organizing curriculum contents and the socio-cultural basis.
    Second, curriculum constrution is a political decision which is made to achieve the special purpose of a nation. So curriclum was made under the control of national policy to solve the social problems of that time.
    Third, culture effects on the acceptance of knowledge as school curriculum content. Here tradition and ideology are importent factors.
    Conclusively, .as the curriculum is constructed for achieving the national purpose, curriculum study has not remained at considering the models and principles of selecting, organiging knowledge. To improve the speciality and function of curriculum, it is necessary the power of social control should be reduced and the curriculum construction must have interactions with society.
    번역하기

    The present study analized the social control of curriculum content to clarify the social factors through sociological theory and sociology of knowledge. In a theoretical approach, a consideration was taken into the curriculum concept, construction m...

    The present study analized the social control of curriculum content to clarify the social factors through sociological theory and sociology of knowledge.
    In a theoretical approach, a consideration was taken into the curriculum concept, construction model process and sociology of knowledge. Traditional study of curriculum that considers knowledge as neutral and universal understands educational contents of school curriculum as taken for granted or neutral. So traditionalists focus on selecting and constructing knowledge which is usually considered a set of idealistic structures of philosophy, psychology, sociology to teach efficiently. They intended to find an efficient way of constructing contents or learing experience (-knowledge) to achieve a higher academic level. And these were treated as the tools of social class movement.
    However, all of the curriculum studies were neglecting the inter-relations between knowledge and society. The view of sociology of knowledge prescribes that curriculum content is made in socio-cultural conditions, and regards it as valid knowledge. They investigate the politically, socially organized curriculum that reproduce the social classes, and try to reveal why the lower class student must fail, through analyzing the code, social class, hegemony, decisin-making process, etc. The intention of dominant groups in society and nation's policy become the major factors in determining curriculum contents. By doing that curriculum mean transmission that stratifies the society. In this view-point, curriculum construction is the social and political decision-making process in which dominant "groups preserve their interest. And consider that the society is ineqal and thai the curriculum reproduces the inequality.
    The purpose of the present study is directing to the construction of curriculum through searching its sociality, social control, and social effects.
    Through the analysis of Korean curriculum(l963's and 1973's), it is found that curriculum contents which were selected and organized speak for the socio-cultural particularity.
    The results of analysis are as follows:
    First, there are inter-relations between selecting and organizing curriculum contents and the socio-cultural basis.
    Second, curriculum constrution is a political decision which is made to achieve the special purpose of a nation. So curriclum was made under the control of national policy to solve the social problems of that time.
    Third, culture effects on the acceptance of knowledge as school curriculum content. Here tradition and ideology are importent factors.
    Conclusively, .as the curriculum is constructed for achieving the national purpose, curriculum study has not remained at considering the models and principles of selecting, organiging knowledge. To improve the speciality and function of curriculum, it is necessary the power of social control should be reduced and the curriculum construction must have interactions with society.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 序論
    • 1. 問題의 提起
    • 2. 硏究의 目的
    • 3. 硏究의 方法
    • 4. 硏究의 制限
    • Ⅰ. 序論
    • 1. 問題의 提起
    • 2. 硏究의 目的
    • 3. 硏究의 方法
    • 4. 硏究의 制限
    • Ⅱ. 敎育課程構成과 知識社會學
    • 1. 敎育課程의 構成
    • 1) 敎育課程의 槪念
    • 2) 敎育課程의 構成
    • 2. 敎育課程構成의 知識社會學的 接近
    • 1) 知識社會學의 槪念
    • 2) 知識社會學의 基底
    • Ⅲ. 敎育課程構成의 知識社會學的 分析
    • 1. 1963년의 敎育課程
    • 2. 1973년의 敎育課程
    • Ⅳ. 要約 및 結論
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼