분황 원효 『보살영락본업경소(菩薩瓔珞本業經疏)』의 중심 내용과 주요 특징 = The Central Content and Main Characteristics of 『Bonupgyung-so』 of Bunhwang Wonhyo

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to examine the central content and main characteristics of 『Bonupgyeng-so』 (本業經疏) written by Bunhwang Wonhyo (芬皇元曉, 617~686). He explained in detail the Ten Precepts (十戒), the Boddhisattva Precepts (菩薩戒), and various Buddhist doctrines, including the Six Entering (六入). In the preface to 『Bonupgyeng-so』, Bunhwang Wonhyo interpreted the name of sutra based on the scriptures and emphasized the Six Entering as a Bodhisattva's Primary Activities.
He also pointed out that scholars of the time were blocked by their obsession with being and nothingness, and attempted to reconcile this.
In this paper, I analyzed the interpretation method and type of 『Bonupgyeng-so』 and discovered some key features of it.
First, the types of interpretation of 『Bonupgyeng-so』 are broadly divided into two types. One is that when Bunhwang Wonhyo interprets 『Bonupgyeng-so』, he first states his opinion and then cites related scriptures. The other is that Bunhwang Wonhyo's opinion is presented first, the scriptures that can support this are cited, and then his opinion is presented overall again. In this second type, Bunhwang Wonhyo appears to be trying to resolve the difference between the Yogâcārabhūmi-śāstra (瑜伽師地論), which belongs to the teachings of the three Vehicles, and 『Bonupgyeng-so』, which belongs to the teachings of the One Vehicle.
Second, Bunhwang Wonhyo shows an interpretation method based on the Avataṃsaka Sūtra in his interpretation of the Ten practices (十行).
In the Sutra on Primary Activities (本業經), there is no explanation of the Ten practices in relation to the Ten paramitas (十波羅蜜). Bunhwang Wonhyo's explanation of the Ten practices in relation to the Ten paramitas appears to be based on the fact that the Ten practices are described together with the Ten paramitas in the Avataṃsaka Sūtra. In addition, Bunhwang Wonhyo expressed his views in an appropriate manner in relation to the contents of each Ten Stages (十地). When Bunhwang Wonhyo wrote 『Bonupgyeng-so』, he directly quoted the Avataṃsaka Sūtra or explained it in relation to the Avataṃsaka Sūtra. Bunhwang Wonhyo's interpretation of the Avataṃsaka Sūtra in 『Bonupgyeng-so』 shows his view of the Avataṃsaka Sūtra.
In conclusion, I think that Bunhwang Wonhyo's viewpoint may have influenced his Commentary on the Avataṃsaka Sūtra (華嚴經疏).

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 해주스님, "화엄의 세계" 민족사 1998

2 이수미, "일승(一乘)·삼승(三乘)의 사상적 관계에 대한 고찰 : 『범망경(梵網經)』 주석으로 본 원효와 대현의 사상적 차이" 동국대학교 세계불교학연구소 12 : 2023

3 남동신, "원효의 발견" ㈜사회평론아카데미 2022

4 문진영, "원효의 『본업경소』에 나타난 보살계위에 관한 연구" 한국불교학회 92 : 2019

5 김태수, "원효의 『本業經疏』에 나타난 이제 중도설의 구조와 특성－｢佛母品｣을 중심으로" 원광대학교 원불교사상연구원 77 : 2018

6 남동신, "원효" 도서출판 새누리 1999

7 고영섭, "분황(芬皇) 원효(元曉)의 화쟁(和諍) 회통(會通) 인식－『십문화쟁론(十門和諍論)』을 중심으로－" 동국대 불교문화연구원 81 : 2017

8 고영섭, "분황 원효의 생애와 사상－‘일심(진여)의 신해성’과 ‘일심지원(본각)의 결정성’을 중심으로" 운주사 2016

9 竺佛念, "菩薩瓔珞本業經"

10 玄奘, "瑜伽師地論"

11 永超, "東域傳燈目錄"

12 김영태, "本業經疏를 통해 본 元曉의 信觀" 원효학회 2 : 1997

13 元曉, "本業經疏"

14 義天, "新編諸宗敎藏總錄"

15 求那跋陀羅, "央掘魔羅經"

16 佛馱跋陀羅, "大方廣佛華嚴經"

17 李萬, "元曉의 『菩薩瓔珞本業經疏』를 통해 본 “一道一果”의 修行觀" 원효학회 3 : 1998

18 李箕永, "元曉聖師의 哲學世界" 민족사 1989

19 金俊涇, "元曉聖師의 哲學世界" 민족사 1989

20 沈載㤠, "元曉思想 Ⅱ 倫理觀" 弘法院 1983

21 鳩摩羅什, "佛說仁王般若波羅蜜經"

22 김영태, "『菩薩瓔珞本業經疏』 연구" 원효학회 4 : 1999