There is few data which can determine the writing order as to 『Bosalgyebonso』 (abbr, A) of Uijeog and 『Beommanggyeongsulgi』(abbr, B) of Seungjang, which are commentaries of 『Beommanggyeong』 representative of Shilla. In this situation, Yosh...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108896770
한명숙 (동국대학교)
2023
Korean
『범망경』 ; 『보살계본소』 ; 『범망경술기』 ; 의적(義寂) ; 승장(勝莊) ; 요시즈 요시히데(吉津宜英) ; 『Bosalgyebonso』 ; Uijeog ; 『Beommanggyeongsulgi』 ; Seungjang ; Yoshizu Yoshihide
KCI등재
학술저널
109-148(40쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
There is few data which can determine the writing order as to 『Bosalgyebonso』 (abbr, A) of Uijeog and 『Beommanggyeongsulgi』(abbr, B) of Seungjang, which are commentaries of 『Beommanggyeong』 representative of Shilla. In this situation, Yosh...
There is few data which can determine the writing order as to 『Bosalgyebonso』 (abbr, A) of Uijeog and 『Beommanggyeongsulgi』(abbr, B) of Seungjang, which are commentaries of 『Beommanggyeong』 representative of Shilla.
In this situation, Yoshizu Yoshihide suggested ‘A to B’ theory, on the basis of their inter-citation by contrasting the writings containing similar contents in the two books.
In the study on 『Beommanggyeong』, writer confirmed that ‘Uijeog to Seungjang’ theory suggested by Yoshizu Yoshihide was made of a very reckless way, being contrary to his strong influence. Also, it was revealed that ‘A to B’ theory could not be validated in the case of these writings as a result of checking thoroughly the writings Yoshizu Yoshihide presented as an evidence.
Furthermore, this thesis presented the writings indicating the foundation for ‘B to A’ theory to be established, and revealed its own reason. Also, this thesis, extending a point of view, investigated the writing order by cross-correlating boththe terminology used in two books.
Through this thesis, first, the existing ‘A to B’ theory was revealed wrongful.
Second, the problem of the writing order was being set back to the starting point, by checking the writing order in a different perspective. Third, the foundation was prepared that in a new perspective the research on the writing order for both sides could be in progress.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 김영미, "신라 승려 義寂과 菩薩戒 受戒儀禮" 한국사학회 (126) : 49-80, 2017
2 한명숙, "복원본 『무량수경술의기』 해제" 동국대학교출판부 2020
3 "長壽王經(T.3)"
4 박광연, "身延文庫藏 無量壽經述記와 義寂의 사상 경향" 동국역사문화연구소 (56) : 37-64, 2014
5 "賢愚經(T.4)"
6 吉津宜英, "華嚴一乘思想の硏究" 大同出版社 1991
7 "菩薩戒義疏(T.40)"
8 "菩薩戒本疏(T.40)"
9 "花嚴經探玄記(T.35)"
10 최연식, "義寂의 思想傾向과 海東法相宗에서의 위상" 불교학연구회 6 : 2-70, 2003
1 김영미, "신라 승려 義寂과 菩薩戒 受戒儀禮" 한국사학회 (126) : 49-80, 2017
2 한명숙, "복원본 『무량수경술의기』 해제" 동국대학교출판부 2020
3 "長壽王經(T.3)"
4 박광연, "身延文庫藏 無量壽經述記와 義寂의 사상 경향" 동국역사문화연구소 (56) : 37-64, 2014
5 "賢愚經(T.4)"
6 吉津宜英, "華嚴一乘思想の硏究" 大同出版社 1991
7 "菩薩戒義疏(T.40)"
8 "菩薩戒本疏(T.40)"
9 "花嚴經探玄記(T.35)"
10 최연식, "義寂의 思想傾向과 海東法相宗에서의 위상" 불교학연구회 6 : 2-70, 2003
11 "瑜伽師地論(T.30)"
12 吉津宜英, "法藏以前の『梵網經』 諸注釋書について" 駒澤大學 47 : 1989
13 "梵網經述記(X.38)"
14 "梵網經菩薩戒本疏(T.40)"
15 白土わか, "梵網經硏究序說" 大谷学会 22 : 1970
16 "梵網經(T.24)"
17 "本業經(T.24)"
18 최원식, "新羅의 菩薩戒 受容과" 국사편찬위원회 29 : 1991
19 橘川智昭, "新羅唯識の研究状況について" 山喜房仏書林 8 : 2000
20 "大乘廣五蘊論(T.31)"
21 羽渓了諦, "唯識宗の異派" 宗敎硏究會 1 (1): 1917
22 "俱舍論(T.29)"
23 한명숙, "『범망경술기』 해제" 동국대학교출판부 2011
24 "X. : 卍續藏"
25 "T. : 大正新修大藏經"
마음챙김 기반 Teaful Mind 명상 프로그램 개발을 위한 기초 연구
일제강점기 사원침탈 양상 -「楊州各寺巡禮記」를 중심으로-
약사불의 치유 - 치유자의 능력과 피치유자의 노력의 만남 -
쫑카빠의 원측 비판과 그 불교 해석학적 함축 - 『해심밀경』 ‘삼시교판(三時敎判)’과 ‘자상(自相)’ 해석을 중심으로 -