RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      의적(義寂)의 『보살계본소』와 승장(勝莊)의 『범망경술기』의 선후관계에 대한 고찰 = Study on the Writing Order Between 『Bosalgyebonso』 of Uijeog And 『Beommanggyeongsulgi』 of Seungjang

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108896770

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      There is few data which can determine the writing order as to 『Bosalgyebonso』 (abbr, A) of Uijeog and 『Beommanggyeongsulgi』(abbr, B) of Seungjang, which are commentaries of 『Beommanggyeong』 representative of Shilla.
      In this situation, Yoshizu Yoshihide suggested ‘A to B’ theory, on the basis of their inter-citation by contrasting the writings containing similar contents in the two books.
      In the study on 『Beommanggyeong』, writer confirmed that ‘Uijeog to Seungjang’ theory suggested by Yoshizu Yoshihide was made of a very reckless way, being contrary to his strong influence. Also, it was revealed that ‘A to B’ theory could not be validated in the case of these writings as a result of checking thoroughly the writings Yoshizu Yoshihide presented as an evidence.
      Furthermore, this thesis presented the writings indicating the foundation for ‘B to A’ theory to be established, and revealed its own reason. Also, this thesis, extending a point of view, investigated the writing order by cross-correlating boththe terminology used in two books.
      Through this thesis, first, the existing ‘A to B’ theory was revealed wrongful.
      Second, the problem of the writing order was being set back to the starting point, by checking the writing order in a different perspective. Third, the foundation was prepared that in a new perspective the research on the writing order for both sides could be in progress.
      번역하기

      There is few data which can determine the writing order as to 『Bosalgyebonso』 (abbr, A) of Uijeog and 『Beommanggyeongsulgi』(abbr, B) of Seungjang, which are commentaries of 『Beommanggyeong』 representative of Shilla. In this situation, Yosh...

      There is few data which can determine the writing order as to 『Bosalgyebonso』 (abbr, A) of Uijeog and 『Beommanggyeongsulgi』(abbr, B) of Seungjang, which are commentaries of 『Beommanggyeong』 representative of Shilla.
      In this situation, Yoshizu Yoshihide suggested ‘A to B’ theory, on the basis of their inter-citation by contrasting the writings containing similar contents in the two books.
      In the study on 『Beommanggyeong』, writer confirmed that ‘Uijeog to Seungjang’ theory suggested by Yoshizu Yoshihide was made of a very reckless way, being contrary to his strong influence. Also, it was revealed that ‘A to B’ theory could not be validated in the case of these writings as a result of checking thoroughly the writings Yoshizu Yoshihide presented as an evidence.
      Furthermore, this thesis presented the writings indicating the foundation for ‘B to A’ theory to be established, and revealed its own reason. Also, this thesis, extending a point of view, investigated the writing order by cross-correlating boththe terminology used in two books.
      Through this thesis, first, the existing ‘A to B’ theory was revealed wrongful.
      Second, the problem of the writing order was being set back to the starting point, by checking the writing order in a different perspective. Third, the foundation was prepared that in a new perspective the research on the writing order for both sides could be in progress.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김영미, "신라 승려 義寂과 菩薩戒 受戒儀禮" 한국사학회 (126) : 49-80, 2017

      2 한명숙, "복원본 『무량수경술의기』 해제" 동국대학교출판부 2020

      3 "長壽王經(T.3)"

      4 박광연, "身延文庫藏 無量壽經述記와 義寂의 사상 경향" 동국역사문화연구소 (56) : 37-64, 2014

      5 "賢愚經(T.4)"

      6 吉津宜英, "華嚴一乘思想の硏究" 大同出版社 1991

      7 "菩薩戒義疏(T.40)"

      8 "菩薩戒本疏(T.40)"

      9 "花嚴經探玄記(T.35)"

      10 최연식, "義寂의 思想傾向과 海東法相宗에서의 위상" 불교학연구회 6 : 2-70, 2003

      1 김영미, "신라 승려 義寂과 菩薩戒 受戒儀禮" 한국사학회 (126) : 49-80, 2017

      2 한명숙, "복원본 『무량수경술의기』 해제" 동국대학교출판부 2020

      3 "長壽王經(T.3)"

      4 박광연, "身延文庫藏 無量壽經述記와 義寂의 사상 경향" 동국역사문화연구소 (56) : 37-64, 2014

      5 "賢愚經(T.4)"

      6 吉津宜英, "華嚴一乘思想の硏究" 大同出版社 1991

      7 "菩薩戒義疏(T.40)"

      8 "菩薩戒本疏(T.40)"

      9 "花嚴經探玄記(T.35)"

      10 최연식, "義寂의 思想傾向과 海東法相宗에서의 위상" 불교학연구회 6 : 2-70, 2003

      11 "瑜伽師地論(T.30)"

      12 吉津宜英, "法藏以前の『梵網經』 諸注釋書について" 駒澤大學 47 : 1989

      13 "梵網經述記(X.38)"

      14 "梵網經菩薩戒本疏(T.40)"

      15 白土わか, "梵網經硏究序說" 大谷学会 22 : 1970

      16 "梵網經(T.24)"

      17 "本業經(T.24)"

      18 최원식, "新羅의 菩薩戒 受容과" 국사편찬위원회 29 : 1991

      19 橘川智昭, "新羅唯識の研究状況について" 山喜房仏書林 8 : 2000

      20 "大乘廣五蘊論(T.31)"

      21 羽渓了諦, "唯識宗の異派" 宗敎硏究會 1 (1): 1917

      22 "俱舍論(T.29)"

      23 한명숙, "『범망경술기』 해제" 동국대학교출판부 2011

      24 "X. : 卍續藏"

      25 "T. : 大正新修大藏經"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼