조선후기 선리논쟁의 착종과 날줄 = Mixture and Cross-line of the Zen-theory Arguments in the Late Joseon Dynasty

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this paper, two points were identified about the controversy of Sunni in the late Joseon Dynasty.
The first is a lateral perspective.
Backpa-geungsun put forward the Zen-theory on various topics in the Seonmoonsugyeong. In this regard, Choui-Uisoon criticized seven themes.
Udam-Honggi criticized four themes from a different perspective from Choui-Uisoon. Suldoo-Yohyung defended Backpa-geungsun's views, but refuted Choui-Uisoon's views in eight ways. In addition, Udam-Honggi's views were refuted in four ways. Chookwon-Jinha also criticized the views of Backpa-geungsun, Udam-Honggi and Suldoo-Yoohyung respectively. And again, the four views of Backpa-geungsun, Choui-Uisoon, Udam-Honggi and Suldoo-Yoohyung were synthesized.
The second is a vertical centripetal point.
From Backpa-geungsun to Chookwon-Jinha, the diachronic theme is a criticism of the three zens related to the three phases of Linjie(臨濟三句), the discrimination of convey one's mind in the three places(三處傳心), a criticism of the distribution of the Tathagata-zen and patriaarch-zen(如來禪·祖師禪.), A word that kills people and a word to save people(殺人刀·活人劍), and the out of form-zen and the based on doctrine-zen(格外禪·義理禪).
Backpa-geungsun classified into three zens: the Tathagata-zen, the patriaarch-zen and the based on doctrine-zen. Choui-Uisoon claims that the Tathagata-zen and the patriarch-zen based on the name of a person, and that the out of form-zen and the based on doctrine-zen based on teaching. Udam-Honggi did not deny the three zens of Backpa-geungsun themselves, but criticized the meaning. Suldoo-Yoohyung is first of the discrimination of conveyor one's mind in the three places is A word that kills people, and second is a word to save peoples in the three places, and third is to show A word that kills people and a word to save people together. Chookwon-Jinha says that the out of form-zen and the based on doctrine-zen all have two zens: the Tathagata-zen and the patriarch-zen.
The Zen-theory Arguments in the late Joseon Dynasty were shown in two ways: first, it was a mixture of criticism, advocacy and refutation among people. The following four themes are the three phases of Linjie, he discrimination of conveyor one's mind in the three places, the type of zen, and A word that kills people and a word to save people.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김호귀, "한국선리논쟁의 전개" 중도 2020

2 서재영, "조선후기 선문논쟁의 전개와 의의" 한국선학회 (22) : 59-110, 2009

3 희철, "조선후기 선리논쟁 연구" 해조음 2012

4 한기두, "원광대학교논문집 4" 원광사 1969

5 김호귀, "우담홍기의 '선문증정록'에 보이는 선리비판 고찰" 한국불교선리연구원 (29) : 195-226, 2020

6 신규탁, "선문수경" 동국대학교출판부 2012

7 김두재, "선문수경" 선운사(백파사상연구소) 2011

8 김영욱, "선문사변만어" 동국대학교출판부 2012

9 김호귀, "선과 선리" 하얀연꽃 2013

10 하미경, "백파와 초의의 선리논쟁 연구" 동국대학교 대학원 2009

11 "韓國佛敎全書 - H"

12 "禪門證正錄"

13 "禪門綱要集"

14 "禪門拈頌拈頌說話會本"

15 "禪門四辨漫語"

16 "禪源遡流"

17 "禪文手鏡"

18 "禪文再正錄"

19 하미경, "白坡亘璇의 三種禪 考察" 한국선학회 (10) : 49-90, 2005

20 김호귀, "『선원소류』에 나타난 선리논쟁의 고찰" 동아시아불교문화학회 (43) : 37-64, 2020

21 김호귀, "『선문재정록』에 나타난 선리논쟁의 성격 고찰" 원불교사상연구원 (85) : 253-279, 2020