경합적 민주주의 이론의 비판적 수용 = 숙의적 접근과의 비교를 중심으로

국문 초록 (Abstract)

이 글에서 연구자는 민주주의 정치와 공론장 연구에 있어서 통칭 숙의적 접근에 대한 지배적인 대안적 논의로 주목받고 있는 경합적 민주주의 이론을 소개하고, 그것이 숙의 민주주의와 어떠한 연관 혹은 대립 속에서 민주주의 사회 내의 정치와 공론장의 가능성 및 그 조건들을 그려내고 있는지에 관한 제 측면들을 고찰하고자 한다. 이를 위해 이 논문은 크게 두 부분으로 구성된다. 첫째, 우선 이 논문은 경합적 민주주의 이론의 이론적 성취에 주되게 기여한 것으로 평가되는 대표적인 저자들의 논의를 각각의 모델로 삼아 비교, 대별하고자 한다. 이를 통해 경합적 민주주의 이론이 가지는 의미를 풍부히 하고자 한다. 둘째, 연구자는 이론에 대한 단순한 소개와 도입의 필요성을 강조하는 것에 그치는 것이 아니라, 그에 대한 비판적 이해를 함께 도모하고자 한다. 이를 위해 이 글에서는 경합적 민주주의 이론을 비판하는 기존의 논의들을, 숙의 민주주의와의 이론적 비교에 주안점을 두면서, 의미 있는 몇 가지 주제로 연구자 나름의 시각에 따라 차별화하여 각각의 내용을 고찰한다. 연구자는 경합적 민주주의 이론이 숙의적 접근에 대한 유용한 이론적 대안이 될 수 있음을 제안하지만, 그에 대한 비판적 재해석도 중요한 것으로 결론짓고자 한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Contemporarily, Agonistic democracy theory has been considered as the remarkably dominant one of alternative approaches against the theoretical camp supporting deliberative democracy or deliberative public sphere. Paying attention to this, this research tries to investigate, critically, the significance and limits of agonistic democracy theory, especially with the comparison with deliberative approach in the level of theoretical discussion. First, this researcher shows the following 3 models to contribute to our understanding of it; arendtial model, Mouffe model, and Connolly model. Each model provides significant discussions concerning the formulation of agonistic democracy theory aspiring toward pluralistic democracy. Furthermore, this research classifies the existing theoretical discussions on limits of the agonistic democracy theory into some disputatious subjects. Based on this critical review, this researcher suggests not only agonistic democracy theory as the more receptive theory to the realistic understanding of democratic politics and public communications, than deliberative approaches, but also emphasizes the theoretical limits arising from the contradictory and inconsistent aspects embedded in its" internal logics.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서론
• 2. 경합적 민주주의 주요 모델들에 대한 검토와 비교
• 3. 경합적 민주주의 이론에 대한 비판적 검토: 숙의민주주의 이론과의 대면을 중심으로
• 4. 결론 및 함의
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Ranciere, J., "정치적인 것의 가장자리에서" 길 1990

2 곽준혁, "심의 민주주의와 비지배적 상호성" 세종연구소 11 (11): 141-168, 2005

3 홍성구, "숙의민주주의의 이론적 보완: 공화주의적 대안 모색을 중심으로" 사단법인 언론과 사회 19 (19): 152-184, 2011

4 박홍원, "공론장의 이론적 진화 : 다원적 민주주의에 대한 함의" 사단법인 언론과 사회 20 (20): 179-229, 2012

5 Ranciere, J., "감성의 분할: 미학과 정치" 비 2006

6 Pitkin, H., "Wittgenstein and Justice" University of California Press 1993

7 Erman, E., "What is wrong with agonistic pluralism? : reflections on conflict in democratic theory" 35 (35): 1039-1062, 2009

8 Honig B., "Toward an agonistic feminism: Hannah Arendt and the politics of identity, In Feminist Interpretations of Hannah Arendt" Pennsylvania State University Press 1995

9 Honig, B., "The politics of agonism : a critical response to Beyond good and evil : Arendt, nietzsche, and the Aestheticization of political action" 21 (21): 528-533, 1993

10 Mansbridge, J., "The place of self-interest and the role of power in deliberative democracy" 18 (18): 64-100, 2010

11 Sunstein, C. R., "The law of group polarization theory, In Debating deliberative democracy" Wiley-Blackwell Publishing 2003

12 Connolly, W., "The ethos of pluralization" University of Minnesota Press 1995

13 Connolly, W., "The ethos of democratization, In Laclau: A critical reader" Routledge 2004

14 Mouffe, C., "The democratic paradox" Verso 2000

15 Mouffe, C., "The Return of the Political" Verso 1993

16 Arendt, H., "The Human Condition" University of Chicago Press 1998

17 Thomassen, L., "The Derrida-Habermas Reader" The University of Chicago Press 2006

18 Schmitt, C., "The Concept of the Political" Rutgers University Press 1976

19 Chamber, S., "Rhetoric and the public sphere : Has deliberative democracy abandoned mass democracy?" 37 (37): 323-350, 2009

20 Fraser, N., "Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy, In Habermas and the Public Sphere" MIT Press 109-142, 1992

21 Pettit, P., "Republicanism : A Theory of freedom and government" Oxford University Press 1997

22 Dryzek J., "Reconciling pluralism and consensus as political ideals" 50 : 634-649, 2006

23 Fives, A., "Reasonable, agonistic or good? The character of a democrat" 2009

24 Schaap, A., "Political theory and the agony of politics" 5 (5): 56-74, 2007

25 Arendt, H., "Philosophy and Politics" 57 (57): 73-103, 1990

26 Mouffe, C., "On the political" Routledge 2005

27 Brady, J., "No contest? : Assessing the agonistic critiques of Jürgen Habermas’ theory of the public sphere" 30 (30): 331-354, 2004

28 Bertram, R., "New reflections on the"revolutionary"politics of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe" 22 (22): 81-110, 1995

29 Goode, L., "Jürgen Habermas : Democracy and the public sphere" Pluto Press 2005

30 Hampshire, S., "Justice is conflict" Princeton University Press 2001

31 Knops, A., "Integrating Agonism with Deliberation-Realising the Benefits" 4 : 151-169, 2012

32 Young, I. M., "Inclusion and Democracy" Oxford University Press 2002

33 Connolly, W., "Identity/difference : Democratic negotiations of political paradox" Cornell University Press 1991

34 Mouffe, C., "Hegemony and Socialist Strategy" Verso 1985

35 Karppinnen, K., "Habermas, Mouffe and political communication : A case for theoretical eclecticism" 15 (15): 5-22, 2008

36 Baxter, H., "Habermas : The discourse theory of law and democracy" Stanford Law Books 2011

37 Olson, J., "Friends and enemies, salves and masters: fanaticism, Wendell Phillips and the limits of agonism, In The politics of radical democracy" Edinburgh University Press 2009

38 Guttman, A., "Democracy and disagreement : Why moral conflict can not be avoided in politics, and what should be done about it" Harvard University Press 1996

39 Benhabib, S., "Democracy and Difference : Contesting the Boundaries of the Political" Princeton University Press 1996

40 Kapoor, I., "Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? The relevance of the Habermas-Mouffe debate for third world politics" 27 : 459-487, 2002

41 Mouffe, C., "Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?" 66 (66): 745-758, 1999

42 Dryzek, J., "Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies : Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia" 33 (33): 218-242, 2005

43 Knops, A., "Debate : agonism as deliberation-on Mouffe’s theory of democracy" 15 (15): 115-126, 2007

44 Markell, P., "Contesting consensus : Rereading Habermas on the public sphere" 3 (3): 377-400, 1997

45 Young, I. M., "Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracy, In Democracy and Difference" Princeton University Press 120-135, 1996

46 Crowder, G., "Chantal Mouffe’s agonistic democracy" 2006

47 Mouffe, C., "Carl Schmitt and the Paradox of Liberal Democracy, In The Challenge of Carl Schmitt" Verso 1999

48 Connolly, W., "Beyond good and evil : The ethical sensibility of Michel Foucault" 21 (21): 365-389, 1993

49 Villa, D. R., "Beyond good and evil : Arendt, Nietzsche, and the Aestheticization of political action" 20 (20): 274-308, 1992

50 Norval, A. J., "Aversive democracy : Inheritance and originality in the democratic tradition" Cambridge University Press 2007

51 Thomassen, L., "Antagonism, hegemony and ideology after heterogeneity" 10 (10): 289-309, 2005

52 Wenman, M., "Agonistic pluralism and three archetypal forms of politics" 2 : 165-186, 2008

53 Schaap, A., "Agonism in divided societies" 32 (32): 255-277, 2006

54 Gürsözlü, F., "Agonism and Deliberation-Recognizing the Difference" 17 (17): 356-368, 2009

55 Karppinen, K., "Against naive pluralism in media politics : On the implications of the radical-pluralist approach to the public sphere. Media" 29 (29): 495-508, 2007

56 Schoolman, M., "A pluralist mind: Agonistic respect and the problem of violence toward difference, In The new pluralism: William Connolly and the contemporary global condition" Duke University Press 2008