교육과정 숙의, 틀 짓기, 미디어의 관계: 2015 국가 교육과정 수학과 개정 사례를 중심으로 = The Relationship between National Curriculum Deliberation, Policy Framing, and Media: A Case Study of the 2015 National Mathematics Curriculum Reform

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study analyzes the case of supoza issue framing within the 2015 National Curriculum Revision process in order to explore the potentiality of media coverage and the role of non-traditional policy actors. This study examines the effect of policy entrepreneurship and media coverage in the national curriculum deliberation process by analyzing the framing of the press releases of both the citizen organization the World without Shadow Education and the Ministry of Education and by comparing these with the actual media coverage of the supoza issue. I found that the World without Shadow Education expanded the issue of supoza by producing and disseminating the data to support their rationale. Their framing indicated that the supoza problem was caused by heavy learning contents within the mathematics curriculum and blamed mathematics academics and mathematics educators for such a condition. Their framing was evidently repeated in the media coverage. This case reveals that non-traditional policy actors may influence national curriculum deliberation by securing policy resources that include information, personnel, leadership, etc. One of the main reasons for the success of their policy entrepreneurship is that they were able to gain and fix public attention by strategically using a rhetorical device, supoza, which evoked a quick and emotional response from the public.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Smith, M. J., "The state: Theories and issues" Palgrave 2006

2 Schattschneider, E. E., "The semisoverign people-'A realist’s view of democracy in America" Prentice-Hall 1960

3 Rochefort, D. A., "The politics of problem defmition: Shaping the policy agenda" University Press of Kansas 1-31, 1994

4 Kirst, W. M., "The political dynamics of American education" McCutchan Publishing Corporation 2009

5 Sabatier, P. A., "The advocacy coalition framework" 33 (33): 181-201, 2007

6 Stone, D., "Policy paradox and political reason" Scott, Foresman 1988

7 Rohdes, R. A. W., "Policy networks in British government" Clarendon 1992

8 Mintrom, M., "Policy entrepreneurs and school choice" Georgetown University Press 2000

9 McDonnell, L. M., "Organized interests and the Common Core" 42 (42): 488-497, 2013

10 Schattschneider, E. E., "Intensity, visibility, direction and scope" 51 (51): 933-942, 1957

11 Lowi, T. J., "Four systems of policy, politics, and choice" 32 (32): 298-310, 1972

12 McCutcheon, G., "Developing the curriculum: Solo and group deliberation" Longman Pub Group 1995

13 Marsh, D., "Changing patterns of governance in the Unities Kingdom : Reinventing Whitehall?" Palgrave 2001

14 Mintrom, M., "Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs, and policy change" 24 (24): 420-434, 1996