RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한국가계의 은퇴준비에 관한 연구 - 중산층 가계의 주관적 은퇴준비 충분성을 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76454470

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

        The subjective adequacy for retirement preparedness of pre-retired Korean households is explored in this study. Not controlling for other factors, various demographic, financial, and retirement-related variables significantly affected the subjective adequacy for retirement preparedness. Among those factors, the most important factors were period of employment, average monthly income, and total retirement needs of the households. Typically, those with longer period of employment, higher income, expectation of larger amount of retirement needs were more likely to be prepared for their retirement adequately. Controlling for other factors, age of householder, whether they have a debt or not, income, real estate asset, expected retirement age, whether they have a personal pension plans significantly affected the subjective retirement adequacy. Retirement planning variables such as expected retirement age and whether they have a personal pension plans had great influence on the adequacy and debt ownership and income level also had greate effect on the adequacy. Results of this study could provide practical implications for financial planners and private bankers in terms of retirement planning process.
      번역하기

        The subjective adequacy for retirement preparedness of pre-retired Korean households is explored in this study. Not controlling for other factors, various demographic, financial, and retirement-related variables significantly affected the ...

        The subjective adequacy for retirement preparedness of pre-retired Korean households is explored in this study. Not controlling for other factors, various demographic, financial, and retirement-related variables significantly affected the subjective adequacy for retirement preparedness. Among those factors, the most important factors were period of employment, average monthly income, and total retirement needs of the households. Typically, those with longer period of employment, higher income, expectation of larger amount of retirement needs were more likely to be prepared for their retirement adequately. Controlling for other factors, age of householder, whether they have a debt or not, income, real estate asset, expected retirement age, whether they have a personal pension plans significantly affected the subjective retirement adequacy. Retirement planning variables such as expected retirement age and whether they have a personal pension plans had great influence on the adequacy and debt ownership and income level also had greate effect on the adequacy. Results of this study could provide practical implications for financial planners and private bankers in terms of retirement planning process.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 매일경제, "한국인 3명중 1명만 노후준비" 매일경제 2006

      2 여윤경, "한국 중산층 가계의 노후자금 적정성" 25 (25): 21-36, 2005

      3 "통계청 홈페이지"

      4 이성림, "은퇴준비에 관한 연구" 2001

      5 문숙재, "예비노인의 은퇴와 경제적 복지의 예측" 12 (12): 115-131, 2001

      6 삼성경제연구소, "노후불안과 소비부진" 삼성경제연구소 (23) : 2005

      7 삼성경제연구소, "노후불안감 확산에 관한 가계의식 조사" 삼성경제연구소 (72) : 2004

      8 이선형, "노인부부가계를 위한 생계비 산정에 관한 연구" 2000

      9 박동석, "고령화 쇼크" 굿인포메이션 2003

      10 Helman R, "Will Americans ever become savers? The 14th Retirement Confidence Survey, Issue Brief 268" Washington D.C.: Employee Benefit Research Institute 2004

      1 매일경제, "한국인 3명중 1명만 노후준비" 매일경제 2006

      2 여윤경, "한국 중산층 가계의 노후자금 적정성" 25 (25): 21-36, 2005

      3 "통계청 홈페이지"

      4 이성림, "은퇴준비에 관한 연구" 2001

      5 문숙재, "예비노인의 은퇴와 경제적 복지의 예측" 12 (12): 115-131, 2001

      6 삼성경제연구소, "노후불안과 소비부진" 삼성경제연구소 (23) : 2005

      7 삼성경제연구소, "노후불안감 확산에 관한 가계의식 조사" 삼성경제연구소 (72) : 2004

      8 이선형, "노인부부가계를 위한 생계비 산정에 관한 연구" 2000

      9 박동석, "고령화 쇼크" 굿인포메이션 2003

      10 Helman R, "Will Americans ever become savers? The 14th Retirement Confidence Survey, Issue Brief 268" Washington D.C.: Employee Benefit Research Institute 2004

      11 Bernheim B. D, "The Merrill Lynch Baby Boom Retirement Index: update 96" Merrill Lynch 1996

      12 Schulz, "The Economics of Aging" 1992

      13 Mitchell O. S., "Retirement wealth accumulation and decumulation: New developments and outstanding opportunities" 97 (97): 1997

      14 Hershey D. A., "Psychological determinants of financial preparedness for retirement" 40 : 687-697, 2000

      15 Moore J. F., "Projected retirement wealth and savings adequacy in the Health and Retirement Study" 98 (98): 1997

      16 Moore J. F., "Projected retirement wealth and saving adequacy" University of Pennsylvania Press 68-94, 2000

      17 Malroutu Y. L., "Perceived adequacy of retirement income" 6 : 17-24, 1995

      18 Hanna S, "Optimal Life Cycle Savings" 6 : 1-15, 1995

      19 Second Edition, "Introduction to Econometrics" Prentice Hall 1992

      20 Li J. P, "Intended retirement and wealth adequacy" 1996

      21 Kim Jinhee, "Factors related to retirement confidence: Retirement preparation and workplace financial education" 16 (16): 1-20, 2005

      22 Joo S.-H., "Factors affecting workers’ retirement confidence: A gender perspective" 13 (13): 1-10, 2002

      23 "Choose to Save 홈페이지"

      24 Yuh Y, "Are Americans prepared for retirement?" 9 (9): 1-12, 1998

      25 Yuh Y, "Adequacy of preparation for retirement: Mean and pessimistic case projections" 1998

      26 Hatcher C. B, "A model of desired wealth at retirement" 8 (8): 57-64, 1997

      27 한국보건사회연구원, "2004년도 전국 노인생활실태 및 복지욕구조사" 한국보건사회연구원 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.35 1.35 1.2
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.33 1.34 1.388 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼