RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    국제조약에서의 부동산투자 분쟁 해결에 대한 연구 = A Study on Real Estate Investment Dispute Settlements in International Treaties

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    After signing a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Chile in 2002, South Korea has concluded FTA negotiations with Singapore, EFTA, ASEAN, the United States, the European Union, India, and Peru, while in negotiations for FTAs with Canada, Mexico, New Zealand, China, Australia, and GCC (as of 2012). South Korea is creating conditions for future FTAs with each region.
    South Korea invests a lot of time and effort in FTA negotiations with each overseas region because Regional Trade Agreements (RTAa) based on FTAs have been increasing rapidly around the world since the early 1990s, while its multilateral trade negotiations initiated by the World Trade Organization (WTO) remain in the doldrums, making any major progress. The WTO statistics show that a total of 380 RTA conclusions (including those for the General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) were reported to WTO from around the world as of July 2007; among them, 240 conclusions were announced after the establishment of WTO in January 1995, 223 RTAs are being implemented as of September 2008, and 136 RTAs were concluded in the form of FTA.
    Another reason behind the flood of FTAs all over the globe may be that WTO attaches importance to multilateral trades and the WTO regulations exceptionally accept FTAs not running counter to several sub-sections. For example, the fact that tariff and other restrictions on other regions shall not be downgraded as compared with before the FTA settlement, although these agreements run counter to the Most Favored Nation (MFN) treatment.
    Considering both the global situation in which FTAs become universal and the domestic situation where the percentage of overseas trades in the South Korean economy is on the gradual increase (with the percentage of import and export in the Gross National Income (GNI) representing 94.2% as of 2007), South Korea can become alienated from international trade relationships and cannot possibly benefit from FTA-based preferential trade if it fails to swim with this global current of the times.
    In relation to the current issue of the reduced growth rate caused by low birthrate and an aging population, FTAs are also regarded as essential to the country in improving productivity through competition, securing stable overseas markets, and expanding foreign direct investment (FDI) domestically.
    To cope with this stream of the times for FTAs, South Korea is pursuing FTAs with many countries simultaneously, and has concluded agreements with large economies, including the United States, the European Union, and India in 2007, 2010, and 2010, respectively.
    South Korea chose to sign FTAs with these regions because they are the world's largest export markets. With South Korea-EU and South Korea-US FTAs coming into force in 2011 and March 2012, respectively, this study aims to investigate how the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSDI) will settle relevant real estate investment disputes.
    번역하기

    After signing a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Chile in 2002, South Korea has concluded FTA negotiations with Singapore, EFTA, ASEAN, the United States, the European Union, India, and Peru, while in negotiations for FTAs with Canada, Mexico, New Zeal...

    After signing a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Chile in 2002, South Korea has concluded FTA negotiations with Singapore, EFTA, ASEAN, the United States, the European Union, India, and Peru, while in negotiations for FTAs with Canada, Mexico, New Zealand, China, Australia, and GCC (as of 2012). South Korea is creating conditions for future FTAs with each region.
    South Korea invests a lot of time and effort in FTA negotiations with each overseas region because Regional Trade Agreements (RTAa) based on FTAs have been increasing rapidly around the world since the early 1990s, while its multilateral trade negotiations initiated by the World Trade Organization (WTO) remain in the doldrums, making any major progress. The WTO statistics show that a total of 380 RTA conclusions (including those for the General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) were reported to WTO from around the world as of July 2007; among them, 240 conclusions were announced after the establishment of WTO in January 1995, 223 RTAs are being implemented as of September 2008, and 136 RTAs were concluded in the form of FTA.
    Another reason behind the flood of FTAs all over the globe may be that WTO attaches importance to multilateral trades and the WTO regulations exceptionally accept FTAs not running counter to several sub-sections. For example, the fact that tariff and other restrictions on other regions shall not be downgraded as compared with before the FTA settlement, although these agreements run counter to the Most Favored Nation (MFN) treatment.
    Considering both the global situation in which FTAs become universal and the domestic situation where the percentage of overseas trades in the South Korean economy is on the gradual increase (with the percentage of import and export in the Gross National Income (GNI) representing 94.2% as of 2007), South Korea can become alienated from international trade relationships and cannot possibly benefit from FTA-based preferential trade if it fails to swim with this global current of the times.
    In relation to the current issue of the reduced growth rate caused by low birthrate and an aging population, FTAs are also regarded as essential to the country in improving productivity through competition, securing stable overseas markets, and expanding foreign direct investment (FDI) domestically.
    To cope with this stream of the times for FTAs, South Korea is pursuing FTAs with many countries simultaneously, and has concluded agreements with large economies, including the United States, the European Union, and India in 2007, 2010, and 2010, respectively.
    South Korea chose to sign FTAs with these regions because they are the world's largest export markets. With South Korea-EU and South Korea-US FTAs coming into force in 2011 and March 2012, respectively, this study aims to investigate how the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSDI) will settle relevant real estate investment disputes.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 안정근, "현대부동산학, 제4판" 양현사 2009

    2 정태식, "해외부동산투자론" 형설출판사 2009

    3 관계부처 합동, "한미자유무역협정 바로 알려드립니다"

    4 "한국수출입은행 홈페이지"

    5 "한국수출입은행 북경사무소 해외투자현지보고서" 2009

    6 "한국무역보험공사 홈페이지"

    7 "한국경제신문 홈페이지"

    8 외교통상본부, "한․미 FTA협정문"

    9 외교통상부, "한․ EU FTA 협정문"

    10 최영찬, "한·미 자유무역협정상 간접수용에 관한 연구" 법제처 2010

    1 안정근, "현대부동산학, 제4판" 양현사 2009

    2 정태식, "해외부동산투자론" 형설출판사 2009

    3 관계부처 합동, "한미자유무역협정 바로 알려드립니다"

    4 "한국수출입은행 홈페이지"

    5 "한국수출입은행 북경사무소 해외투자현지보고서" 2009

    6 "한국무역보험공사 홈페이지"

    7 "한국경제신문 홈페이지"

    8 외교통상본부, "한․미 FTA협정문"

    9 외교통상부, "한․ EU FTA 협정문"

    10 최영찬, "한·미 자유무역협정상 간접수용에 관한 연구" 법제처 2010

    11 재무부, "투자보장협정집" 재무부 국제금융국 1991

    12 정태식, "우리나라의 해외부동산 직접투자제도 변천과 결정요인에 관한 연구" 한성대학교 대학원 2008

    13 "외교통상부 홈페이지"

    14 장희순, "부동산학개론" 부연사 2007

    15 정태식, "부동산조세론" 가림출판사 2010

    16 정태식, "부동산경제정책용어사전" 굿인포메이션 2007

    17 "기획재정부 홈페이지"

    18 이용섭, "국제조세" 재정경제부 2005

    19 박덕영, "국제법 기본조약집" 박영사 2011

    20 WTO, "Understanding the WTO" World Trade Organization Information and Media Relations Division 2007

    21 Roberto V. Fiorentino, "The Changing Landscape of Regional Trade Agreements : 2006 Update" WTO 2006

    22 JETRO, "JETRO투자백서" 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.18 0.18 0.17
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.15 0.14 0.343 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼