RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      동북아지역의 안보균형을 위한 적정수준 국방비 분석에 관한 연구 = The appropriate amount of Defense budget for stabilizing National security in Northeast Asia

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101832103

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      It is undoubtedly true that national security in Korean peninsula is on the road to destabilization. The main factors are known to be North Korea’s development and experiment on nuclear arms, especially the forth nuclear experiment on January 6th, ICBM launch February 7th, and encroachment upon the territory the NLL on the 8th along with the shutdown on Gaeseong Industrial Complex. Also, China``s trouble with other nations over sovereignty over islands in the South China Sea and the fact that Japan``s government is veering to the right side and having territorial dispute are making the case worse. Nations in Northeast Asia are striving to obtain the interest for the sake of their own country. In order to do so, they``re walking the path to achieve national security. Until then, they are not so willing to participate foreign matters or economical race. Even in our perspective, these issues are many of the main problems which our country is currently facing. However, it is important for them to avoid making policies which may take away the citizen``s happiness. The number one priority for the nation or any form of a group is to act in the best interest for the national security and the citizen``s happiness. They are the main factors why a nation could exist. They are the symbols of a nation``s sovereign authority. Countries outside are proving it by increasing their national defense budget even in this unprecedented economical crisis. If we are willing to stay the same as ever, the disparity in the military force will not be the same in the future. In conclusion, the study examines the problem which changes in Northeast Asia``s defense environment could bring and the appropriate amount of national defense budget in order to support the nation``s integration of its abilities to move toward South and North Korea``s unification.
      번역하기

      It is undoubtedly true that national security in Korean peninsula is on the road to destabilization. The main factors are known to be North Korea’s development and experiment on nuclear arms, especially the forth nuclear experiment on January 6th, I...

      It is undoubtedly true that national security in Korean peninsula is on the road to destabilization. The main factors are known to be North Korea’s development and experiment on nuclear arms, especially the forth nuclear experiment on January 6th, ICBM launch February 7th, and encroachment upon the territory the NLL on the 8th along with the shutdown on Gaeseong Industrial Complex. Also, China``s trouble with other nations over sovereignty over islands in the South China Sea and the fact that Japan``s government is veering to the right side and having territorial dispute are making the case worse. Nations in Northeast Asia are striving to obtain the interest for the sake of their own country. In order to do so, they``re walking the path to achieve national security. Until then, they are not so willing to participate foreign matters or economical race. Even in our perspective, these issues are many of the main problems which our country is currently facing. However, it is important for them to avoid making policies which may take away the citizen``s happiness. The number one priority for the nation or any form of a group is to act in the best interest for the national security and the citizen``s happiness. They are the main factors why a nation could exist. They are the symbols of a nation``s sovereign authority. Countries outside are proving it by increasing their national defense budget even in this unprecedented economical crisis. If we are willing to stay the same as ever, the disparity in the military force will not be the same in the future. In conclusion, the study examines the problem which changes in Northeast Asia``s defense environment could bring and the appropriate amount of national defense budget in order to support the nation``s integration of its abilities to move toward South and North Korea``s unification.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 평화문제연구소, 379 : 11-, 2015

      2 김동수, "한반도 통일을 위한 대주변국 전략" 공군사관학교 91-, 2014

      3 조남훈, "한국의 전략환경변화와 한국군의 당면 문제" (가을) : 36-, 2014

      4 통일부 통일교육원, "통일문제 이해 2014" (주)대원문화사 118-119, 2014

      5 안보문제연구원, "통일로,5월"

      6 문성묵, "천암함 이후 북한 군사력 증강과 대응책" 31-37, 2014

      7 백제옥, "중국군사력 건설의 기반요인 분석" 1-2, 2014

      8 성우안보전략연구원, "월간 자유, 4월호"

      9 북한연구소, "월간 북한,1월호"

      10 북한연구소, "월간 북한,10월호"

      1 평화문제연구소, 379 : 11-, 2015

      2 김동수, "한반도 통일을 위한 대주변국 전략" 공군사관학교 91-, 2014

      3 조남훈, "한국의 전략환경변화와 한국군의 당면 문제" (가을) : 36-, 2014

      4 통일부 통일교육원, "통일문제 이해 2014" (주)대원문화사 118-119, 2014

      5 안보문제연구원, "통일로,5월"

      6 문성묵, "천암함 이후 북한 군사력 증강과 대응책" 31-37, 2014

      7 백제옥, "중국군사력 건설의 기반요인 분석" 1-2, 2014

      8 성우안보전략연구원, "월간 자유, 4월호"

      9 북한연구소, "월간 북한,1월호"

      10 북한연구소, "월간 북한,10월호"

      11 이월형, "안보위협을 고려한 적정국방비 규모판단" 충성대연구소 65-, 2011

      12 정보사령부, "세계의 군사력 2015"

      13 정보사령부, "세계의 군사력 2014"

      14 유용원, "북한군 시크릿 리포트" 플레닛미디어 40-41, 2013

      15 신성호, "미국의 아시아 올인정책" 한국전략문제연구소 19 (19): 153-186, 2012

      16 국방기술품질원, "미국 방위산업정책 이슈와 국방예산"

      17 이월형, "국가안보론" 황금소나무 33-42, 2015

      18 "http:/ / tip.daum.net/question/119217/79053534?q=%EB%9F%AC%EC%8B%9C%EC%95%84+%EA%B5%B0%EC%82%AC%EB%AC%B4%EA%B8%B0"

      19 Timothy Hu, "Country Briefing-China: Ready, Steady, go,."

      20 국방기술품질원, "2013 중국 군사력 및 안보동향" 46-57, 2013

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.59 0.59 0.66
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.61 0.57 0.894 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼