RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      韓國 腹藏의 密敎 尊像 安立儀禮적 성격 고찰 = Rethinking Korean bokjang as Pratiṣṭhā or the Ritual of Image-Installation in Indian Esoteric Buddhism

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      What does it make a buddha image into a buddha? This question has been hotly discussed since the 1990s centering on the installation ritual of Buddhist images in Indo-Tibetan Esoteric Buddhism or on the objects yielded from inner recesses of Chinese and Japanese Buddhist images. There are few textual evidences for such rituals for Chinese and Japanese examples, making it difficult to examine scriptural basis or doctrinal background of them. In contrast, the Korean tradition of bokjang or the practice of interring objects within Buddhist images provides us a rare opportunity to compare a ritual manual called Josang gyeong with extant bokjang deposits yielded from Goryeo and Joseon Buddhist statues. The distinctive composition of the bokjang, shown in both the ritual manual and remaining objects, has led scholars to characterize this important ritual tradition as a unique product of Korean Buddhism. Most Korean scholars define bokjang as consecration, a ritual to invest a material image with sacred presence of the divine. This view accords well with a pervasive explanatory model in the Western academia that often describes the consecration as a ritual tool to animate, enliven, or empower an inert image. The emergence of this view, which I call a ritualistic view of Buddhist images, marks a significant turning point in the history of Korean Buddhist image-making practices. I have argued elsewhere that a ritual idea, derived from late Indian Esoteric Buddhism and transmitted to the Korean peninsula through Chinese translations of scriptures and manuals during the Song and Liao periods, have played a vital role in the transformation of Korean Buddhists’ perception of Buddhist images. This article aims to reconsider the overall structure of the bokjang ritual in light of pratiṣṭhā or the ritual of image-installation in Indian Esoteric Buddhism. This line of inquiry helps us better understand how the formation of bokjang ritual and its spread transformed the medieval Korean perception of Buddhist images and the practice of making images.
      번역하기

      What does it make a buddha image into a buddha? This question has been hotly discussed since the 1990s centering on the installation ritual of Buddhist images in Indo-Tibetan Esoteric Buddhism or on the objects yielded from inner recesses of Chinese a...

      What does it make a buddha image into a buddha? This question has been hotly discussed since the 1990s centering on the installation ritual of Buddhist images in Indo-Tibetan Esoteric Buddhism or on the objects yielded from inner recesses of Chinese and Japanese Buddhist images. There are few textual evidences for such rituals for Chinese and Japanese examples, making it difficult to examine scriptural basis or doctrinal background of them. In contrast, the Korean tradition of bokjang or the practice of interring objects within Buddhist images provides us a rare opportunity to compare a ritual manual called Josang gyeong with extant bokjang deposits yielded from Goryeo and Joseon Buddhist statues. The distinctive composition of the bokjang, shown in both the ritual manual and remaining objects, has led scholars to characterize this important ritual tradition as a unique product of Korean Buddhism. Most Korean scholars define bokjang as consecration, a ritual to invest a material image with sacred presence of the divine. This view accords well with a pervasive explanatory model in the Western academia that often describes the consecration as a ritual tool to animate, enliven, or empower an inert image. The emergence of this view, which I call a ritualistic view of Buddhist images, marks a significant turning point in the history of Korean Buddhist image-making practices. I have argued elsewhere that a ritual idea, derived from late Indian Esoteric Buddhism and transmitted to the Korean peninsula through Chinese translations of scriptures and manuals during the Song and Liao periods, have played a vital role in the transformation of Korean Buddhists’ perception of Buddhist images. This article aims to reconsider the overall structure of the bokjang ritual in light of pratiṣṭhā or the ritual of image-installation in Indian Esoteric Buddhism. This line of inquiry helps us better understand how the formation of bokjang ritual and its spread transformed the medieval Korean perception of Buddhist images and the practice of making images.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 머리말
      • II. 고려시대 불복장의 구성
      • III. 『조상경』과 밀교계 경전, 복장물의 관계
      • IV. 안립의궤로서의 『조상경』, 안립의례로서의 불복장
      • V. 맺음말
      • I. 머리말
      • II. 고려시대 불복장의 구성
      • III. 『조상경』과 밀교계 경전, 복장물의 관계
      • IV. 안립의궤로서의 『조상경』, 안립의례로서의 불복장
      • V. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • ABSTRACT
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 문명대, "인도·중국 불복장(佛腹藏)의 기원과 한국 불복장의 전개" 한국불교미술사학회 (44) : 293-311, 2015

      2 이선용, "우리나라 불복장의 특징" 한국미술사학회 289 (289): 93-120, 2016

      3 정은우, "고려시대 불복장의 특징과 형성배경" 한국미술사학회 286 (286): 31-58, 2015

      4 김수연, "高麗時代 灌頂道場의 사상적 배경과 특징" 한국사상사학회 (42) : 105-134, 2012

      5 이승혜, "高麗時代 佛腹藏의 形成과 意味" 한국미술사학회 285 (285): 71-100, 2015

      6 태경스님, "造像經: 佛腹藏의 節次와 그 속에 담긴 思想" 운주사 2006

      7 "造像經"

      8 "妙吉祥平等祕密最上觀門大敎王經"

      9 "佛說陀羅尼集經"

      10 "佛說一切如來安像三昧儀軌經"

      1 문명대, "인도·중국 불복장(佛腹藏)의 기원과 한국 불복장의 전개" 한국불교미술사학회 (44) : 293-311, 2015

      2 이선용, "우리나라 불복장의 특징" 한국미술사학회 289 (289): 93-120, 2016

      3 정은우, "고려시대 불복장의 특징과 형성배경" 한국미술사학회 286 (286): 31-58, 2015

      4 김수연, "高麗時代 灌頂道場의 사상적 배경과 특징" 한국사상사학회 (42) : 105-134, 2012

      5 이승혜, "高麗時代 佛腹藏의 形成과 意味" 한국미술사학회 285 (285): 71-100, 2015

      6 태경스님, "造像經: 佛腹藏의 節次와 그 속에 담긴 思想" 운주사 2006

      7 "造像經"

      8 "妙吉祥平等祕密最上觀門大敎王經"

      9 "佛說陀羅尼集經"

      10 "佛說一切如來安像三昧儀軌經"

      11 최선아, "『주문(呪文), 상(像), 만다라(曼茶羅): 밀교(密敎) 의례의 전개과정』" 인문과학연구소 37 (37): 213-223, 2016

      12 Strickmann, Michel, "Mantras et mandarins: Le bouddhisme tantrique en Chine" Gallimard 1996

      13 Mori, Masahide, "From Material to Deity: Indian Rituals of Consecration" Manohar 2005

      14 Robson, James, "Buddhism Across Asia: Networks of Material, Intellectual, and Cultural Exchange 1" Institute of South Asia Studies 2014

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-03-23 학회명변경 한글명 : (재)성강문화재단 한국미술연구소 -> 한국미술연구소
      영문명 : Sung Kang Foundation -> Center for Art Studies
      KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-06-29 학회명변경 한글명 : (재)성강문화재단 -> (재)성강문화재단 한국미술연구소
      영문명 : Sungn Gang Culture Foundation -> Sung Kang Foundation
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.84 0.84 0.81
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.72 0.61 0.836 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼