좋은 과학 영재 수업에 대한 학생과 교사의 생각 비교 = A Comparison Between the Perceptions of Elementary Gifted Child and Science Teacher about the Good Science Class

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study compares the perceptions of elementary gifted child and science teacher in a science class for the gifted. In order to explore the research problem, students and teachers answered a written semi-structured questionnaire and participated in interviews regarding the gifted science class. The data was collected and analyzed. Science teachers recognized the characteristics of a good science class, especially in terms of educational content and teaching methodology. First, they suggested promoting inquiry skills, presenting a challenging task in atypical topic selection, student-centered curriculum, and controlling the pace of learning to recognize individual differences. Second, in terms of the science class skills and attitudes category, teachers recommended raising mutual satisfaction through vigorous interaction within a permissible atmosphere. Finally, science teachers need to strive for continued professional growth. Gifted children, meanwhile, want to investigate a wide range of topics without time constraints. Additionally, they may have to explore challenging topics further. They prefer to act like scientists in that they enjoy group activities, communication and cooperation. In particular, they want to be evaluated by others in a totally embedded assessment. Gifted children also expect teachers to understand the life circumstances and needs of the students. In addition, they asked for teachers to respect individual experiments and to show them how to safely use new equipment or research methods. As a result, gifted children and science teachers have to recognize the differences of opinion concerning a good science class for the gifted. This study can help formulate strategies to establish quality management of materials in gifted science classes.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 임재근, "초등 교사의 전문성 발달 과정 연구" 한국초등과학교육학회 27 (27): 93-101, 2008

2 서혜애, "초등 과학영재수업의 교수,학습실태 분석" 한국초등과학교육학회 23 (23): 219-227, 2004

3 곽영순, "좋은 수업에 대한 질적 연구: 중등 과학 수업을 중심으로" 한국과학교육학회 23 (23): 144-154, 2003

4 배진호, "사회적 상호 작용을 강조한 초등 과학 수업이 메타인지, 과학 학습 동기, 학업 성취도에 미치는 영향" 한국초등과학교육학회 28 (28): 519-528, 2009

5 유희원, "과학적 모형의 사회적 공동구성 수업에서 나타나는 과학 영재 학생들의 상호작용 역할과 개인의 내적, 관계적 요인 사이의 관련성" 한국영재학회 22 (22): 265-290, 2012

6 김종백, "과학영재를 위한 교수-학습 전략" 한국영재교육학회 5 (5): 19-32, 2006

7 박종욱, "과학영재교육원의 교육활동이 학생들의 과학 관련 진로 선택에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국영재학회 18 (18): 497-518, 2008

8 박종석, "과학영재 수업에 대한 예비 과학교사들의 인식" 한국과학교육학회 31 (31): 609-620, 2011

9 조현준, "과학 실험 수업에 대한 초등학생들의 인식 분석" 한국초등과학교육학회 27 (27): 117-133, 2008

10 오필석, "“채워지지 않는 잔(盞)”: 초등 교사들에게 있어 과학 수업의 의미" 한국과학교육학회 31 (31): 271-294, 2011

11 김재춘, "‘좋은 수업’의 의미에 대한 비판적 검토" 한국수산해양교육학회 17 (17): 373-382, 2005

12 Chan, M. T., "The teaching of science process skills: primary teachers'self-perception" 5 : 91-111, 2002

13 Hofstein, A., "The role of the laboratory in science teaching : neglected aspects of research" 52 : 201-217, 1982

14 Meyer, J. D., "The role of sustained professional development in science teacher renewal and retention" 2003

15 Kang, H. K., "The Professional Development Program for Teacher of Science Gifted Students" 16 : 137-160, 2004

16 Maker, C. J., "Teaching models in education of the gifted" PRO-EDUCATION 1995

17 Kwak, Y. S., "Teacher assessment, Instruction assessment" Wonmi Press 2005

18 Osborne, J., "Students’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum : a focus-group study" 23 : 441-467, 2001

19 Gagne´, M., "Self-determination theory and work motivation" 26 : 331-362, 2005

20 Patton, M. Q., "Qualitative evaluation methods" Sage 1980

21 Creswell, J. W., "Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches" Sage 2007

22 Huberman, A. M., "Qualitative Data Analysis" Sage Publications 1994

23 Colaizzi, P. E., "Psychological research as the phenomenologist view it existential phenomenology" Oxford University press 1978

24 Giorgi, A., "Phenomenology and Psychological Research" Duquesne University Press 1985

25 Gilbert, J. K., "On the nature of ‘context’ in chemical education" 28 : 957-976, 2006

26 Lincoln, Y. S., "Naturalistic inquiry" Sage 1985

27 Harwood, W. S., "Mercury Breaks the Law!" 27 (27): 50-54, 2002

28 Seidman, I., "Interviewing as qualitative research" Teachers College Press 1998

29 Cuban, L., "How schools chang reforms: redefining reform success and failure" 99 (99): 453-477, 1998

30 Klopfer, L. E., "Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning" McGraw-Hill 1971

31 Pfeiffer, S. I., "Handbook of giftedness in children" Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 177-198, 2008

32 Van Tassel-Baska, J., "Handbook of gifted education" Allyn & Bacon 174-183, 2003

33 Subotnik, R., "Genius revisited: High IQ children grown up" Ablex Publishing Corp 1993

34 Miedijensky, S., "Embedded assessment in project-based science courses for the gifted: insights to inform teaching all students" 1-25, 2009

35 Appleton, K., "Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice" Association for Science Teachers and Laurence Erlbaum 2006

36 Kwon, Y., "Effect on development of proportional reasoning skill of physical experience and cognitive abilities associated with prefrontal lobe activity" 37 (37): 1171-1182, 2000

37 Gowin, D. B., "Educating" Cornell University Press 1981

38 Lee, M. S., "Depth interview study" 18 (18): 215-241, 2002

39 Kumpulainen, K., "Classroom Interaction and Social Learning" Routledge Falmer 2002

40 Yin, R. K., "Case study research: Design and methods" Sage 2003

41 Stake, R., "Case studies in science education" Center for Instructional Research and Evaluation 1978

42 Resnick, M., "Beyond black boxes : Bringing transparency and aesthetics back to scientific investigation" 9 (9): 7-30, 2000

43 Brophy, J. E., "Beyond behaviorism:changing the classroom management paradigm" Allyn and Bacon 43-56, 1999