RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    DEA 윈도우 분석을 이용한 정부출연연구기관의 연구개발 사업화 동태적 효율성 분석

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101728095

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Government-funded research institutes (GRIs) have played a pivotal role in national R&D in Korea. To achieve desired goals of GRIs with the limited R&D budget, their performance along with time needs to be measured and compared so that appropriate R&D policies can be formulated and implemented. This study measures the dynamic performance of GRIs from the efficiency perspective using the window model of data envelopment analysis (DEA). DEA is a non-parametric approach to measuring the relative efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs, and the DEA window model can capture the dynamic changes in efficiency of DMUs during multiple periods. The relative efficiency of GRIs is measured from the two perspectives: R&D and R&BD. Patents, papers, technology transfers are selected as outputs for R&D while compensated technology transfers and technology royalty are employed as outputs for R&BD. This study measures and compares the two types of performance of 20 Korean GRIs under the control of National Research Council of Science and Technology during the period of six years from 2008 to 2013. The results are expected to provide fruitful implications for national R&D policy making.
    번역하기

    Government-funded research institutes (GRIs) have played a pivotal role in national R&D in Korea. To achieve desired goals of GRIs with the limited R&D budget, their performance along with time needs to be measured and compared so that appropriate R&D...

    Government-funded research institutes (GRIs) have played a pivotal role in national R&D in Korea. To achieve desired goals of GRIs with the limited R&D budget, their performance along with time needs to be measured and compared so that appropriate R&D policies can be formulated and implemented. This study measures the dynamic performance of GRIs from the efficiency perspective using the window model of data envelopment analysis (DEA). DEA is a non-parametric approach to measuring the relative efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs, and the DEA window model can capture the dynamic changes in efficiency of DMUs during multiple periods. The relative efficiency of GRIs is measured from the two perspectives: R&D and R&BD. Patents, papers, technology transfers are selected as outputs for R&D while compensated technology transfers and technology royalty are employed as outputs for R&BD. This study measures and compares the two types of performance of 20 Korean GRIs under the control of National Research Council of Science and Technology during the period of six years from 2008 to 2013. The results are expected to provide fruitful implications for national R&D policy making.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. DEA를 이용한 정부출연연 성과 평가 연구
    • 3. 연구 방법
    • 4. R&D 효율성
    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. DEA를 이용한 정부출연연 성과 평가 연구
    • 3. 연구 방법
    • 4. R&D 효율성
    • 5. R&BD 효율성
    • 6. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김현정, "공공기관의 유형별 효율성 평가와 비효율성 원인의 규명에 관한 연구" 한국경영과학회 40 (40): 75-89, 2015

    2 이상훈, "‘자료포락분석(DEA)을 이용한 지식 서비스(KIBS) 산업의 혁신 성과 분석" 한국경영공학회 16 (16): 129-144, 2011

    3 Yang, H.-H, "Using DEA window analysis to measure efficiencies of Taiwan’s integrated telecommunication firms" 33 (33): 98-108, 2009

    4 Meng, W, "Two-level DEA approaches in Research Evaluation" 36 (36): 950-957, 2008

    5 Rousseau, S, "The scientific wealth of European nations : taking effectiveness into account" 42 (42): 75-87, 1998

    6 Banker, R.D, "Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis" 30 (30): 1078-1092, 1984

    7 Groot, T, "Research quality and efficiency : an analysis of assessments and management issues in Dutch economics and business research programs" 35 (35): 1362-1376, 2006

    8 Johnes, J, "Research funding and performance in UK university departments of economics : a frontier analysis" 14 (14): 301-314, 1995

    9 Wang, E.C, "Relative efficiency of R&D activities : A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach" 36 (36): 260-273, 2007

    10 Charnes, A, "Preface to topics in data envelopment analysis" 2 (2): 59-94, 1984

    1 김현정, "공공기관의 유형별 효율성 평가와 비효율성 원인의 규명에 관한 연구" 한국경영과학회 40 (40): 75-89, 2015

    2 이상훈, "‘자료포락분석(DEA)을 이용한 지식 서비스(KIBS) 산업의 혁신 성과 분석" 한국경영공학회 16 (16): 129-144, 2011

    3 Yang, H.-H, "Using DEA window analysis to measure efficiencies of Taiwan’s integrated telecommunication firms" 33 (33): 98-108, 2009

    4 Meng, W, "Two-level DEA approaches in Research Evaluation" 36 (36): 950-957, 2008

    5 Rousseau, S, "The scientific wealth of European nations : taking effectiveness into account" 42 (42): 75-87, 1998

    6 Banker, R.D, "Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis" 30 (30): 1078-1092, 1984

    7 Groot, T, "Research quality and efficiency : an analysis of assessments and management issues in Dutch economics and business research programs" 35 (35): 1362-1376, 2006

    8 Johnes, J, "Research funding and performance in UK university departments of economics : a frontier analysis" 14 (14): 301-314, 1995

    9 Wang, E.C, "Relative efficiency of R&D activities : A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach" 36 (36): 260-273, 2007

    10 Charnes, A, "Preface to topics in data envelopment analysis" 2 (2): 59-94, 1984

    11 Cherchye, L, "On research efficiency : A micro-analysis of Dutch university research in economics and business management" 34 (34): 495-516, 2005

    12 Xue, M, "Note : Ranking DMUs with infeasible super-efficiency DEA models" 48 (48): 705-710, 2002

    13 Ortega, J.L, "Multivariate approach to classify research institutes according to their outputs : The case of the CSIC’s institutes" 5 (5): 323-332, 2011

    14 Zhu, J, "Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to fortune 500 companies" 123 (123): 105-124, 2000

    15 Guan, J, "Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation system" 35 (35): 102-115, 2012

    16 Charnes, A, "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units" 2 (2): 429-444, 1978

    17 Hsu, F.-M, "Measuring relative efficiency of government-sponsored R&D projects : A three-stage approach" 32 (32): 178-186, 2009

    18 Kocher, M, "Measuring productivity of research in economics : A cross-country study using DEA" 40 (40): 314-332, 2006

    19 Lee, S, "Measuring and comparing the R&D performance of government research institutes : A bottom-up data envelopment analysis approach" (9) : 942-953, 2015

    20 Carlos, S.-C, "Measuring DEA efficiency in internet companies" 38 (38): 557-573, 2005

    21 Robert, W, "Levels of efficiency in UK retail banks : a DEA window analysis" 10 (10): 305-322, 2003

    22 Sharma, S, "Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis : An application of data envelopment analysis" 76 (76): 483-501, 2008

    23 Guan, J, "Evaluation and interpretation of knowledge production efficiency" 59 (59): 131-155, 2004

    24 Agasisti, T, "Evaluating the performance of academic departments : an analysis of research-related output efficiency" 21 (21): 2-14, 2012

    25 Revilla, E, "Evaluating performance of public-private research collaborations : A DEA analysis" 54 (54): 165-174, 2003

    26 Colbert, A, "Determining the relative efficiency of MBA programs using DEA" 125 (125): 656-669, 2000

    27 Rousseau, S, "Data envelopment analysis as a tool for constructing scientometric indicators" 40 (40): 45-56, 1997

    28 Cooper, W. W, "Data Envelopment Analysis : A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software" Springer 2007

    29 임성묵, "DEA에서 교차효율성의 공격적 정형화" 한국경영과학회 33 (33): 83-100, 2008

    30 구승환, "DEA를 활용한 주식 포트폴리오 구성에 관한 연구" 한국경영과학회 31 (31): 1-12, 2014

    31 문하나, "DEA를 활용한 국내 기업의 에너지효율성 분석" 한국경영과학회 32 (32): 37-54, 2015

    32 이대용, "DEA/윈도우 기법을 이용한 정보기술산업의 경영효율성과 규모 경제성 평가에 관한 연구" 10 (10): 17-40, 2000

    33 이형석, "DEA/Window 모형을 이용한 국내 생명보험산업의 상대적 효율성 분석" 한국콘텐츠학회 8 (8): 192-206, 2008

    34 남인석, "DEA 모형을 이용한 정부출연연구기관의 상대적 효율성 분석" 한국산업경영시스템학회 31 (31): 1-10, 2008

    35 현만석, "DEA 모형을 이용한 공공연구기관의 기술이전 효율성 분석에 관한 연구" 한국산업경영시스템학회 31 (31): 94-103, 2008

    36 전훈, "DEA 기반 온라인 게임 성과 관리 포트폴리오 모형" 대한산업공학회 39 (39): 260-270, 2013

    37 Thore, S, "DEA and the management of the product cycle : The US computer industry" 23 (23): 341-356, 1996

    38 Liu, J.S, "DEA and ranking with the network-based approach : a case of R&D performance" 38 (38): 453-464, 2010

    39 전훈, "DEA Window 분석을 이용한 국내 온라인 게임 기업의 운영 효율성 평가" 한국경영과학회 39 (39): 23-40, 2014

    40 Liu, F.-H, "DEA Malmquist productivity measure : Taiwanese semiconductor companies" 112 (112): 367-379, 2008

    41 Lee, H, "Comparative evaluation of performance of national R&D programs with heterogeneous objectives : A DEA approach" 196 (196): 847-855, 2009

    42 Asmild, M, "Combining DEA window analysis with the Malmquist index approach in a study of the Canadian banking industry" 1 (1): 67-89, 2004

    43 Narin, F, "Bibliometric performance measures" 36 (36): 293-310, 1996

    44 Luwel, M, "Bibliometric assessment of research performance in Flanders : Policy background and implication" 29 (29): 133-142, 1999

    45 Abramo, G, "Assessing technical and cost efficiency of research activities : a case study of the Italian universities system" 18 (18): 61-70, 2009

    46 Linton, J. D, "Analysis, ranking and selection of R&D projects in a portfolio" 32 (32): 139-148, 2002

    47 이학연, "An International Comparison of R&D Efficiency : DEA Approach" 기술경영경제학회 13 (13): 207-222, 2005

    48 Yang, Z, "A two-stage DEA model to evaluate the overall performance of Canadian life and health insurance companies" 43 (43): 910-919, 2006

    49 Bonaccorsi, A, "A robust nonparametric approach to the analysis of scientific productivity" 12 (12): 47-69, 2003

    50 Abramo, G, "A field-standardized application of DEA to national-scale research assessment of universities" 5 (5): 618-628, 2011

    51 Charnes, A, "A developmental study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the US air forces" 2 (2): 95-112, 1984

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.59 0.59 0.62
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.63 0.63 0.998 0.07
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼