과제 제시방법에 따른 유아의 공간표상

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of task conditions (physical similarity between the spatial product and the reference space, presentation place of the spatial product) on children`s spatial representation. The participants consisted of 40 3-year-olds and 40 4-year-olds. The results of this study are as follows. Both 3-year-olds and 4-year-olds were capable of a greater degree of spatial representation when there was a high level of physical similarity between the spatial product and the reference space, and when the presentation place of the spatial product was in the reference space. 4-year-olds were capable of more accurate spatial representation than 3-year-olds. There was no significant difference in the children`s spatial representation depending on the type of spatial product (scale model, map). The results revealed that the physical similarity between the spatial product and the reference space and the presentation place of the spatial product are essential in young children`s spatial representation. Additionally, the results indicated that spatial representation of children develops gradually from when they are three to when they turn four.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Troseth, G. L., "Young children's use of scale models：testing an alternative to representational insight" 10 (10): 763-769, 2007

2 Bremner, J. G., "Young children's ability to use maps and models to find ways in novel spaces" 16 : 197-218, 1998

3 Marzolf, D. P., "Trans-fer in young children's understanding of spatial representation" 65 : 1-15, 1994

4 Sharon, T., "The role of perseveration in children's symbolic un-derstanding and skill" 6 (6): 289-296, 2003

5 Gentner, D., "The mechanisms of analo- gical learning, In Similarity and analogical reasoning" Cambridge Univer- sity Press 199-241, 1989

6 Blades, M., "The develop- ment of children's ability to use spatial representations, In Ad- vances in child development and behavior" Acade- mic Press 157-199, 1994

7 Piaget, J., "The child's conception of space" Norton 1956

8 DeLoache, J. S., "The Development of representation in young children, In Advances in child development and behavior" Academic Press 1-39, 1989

9 DeLoache, J. S., "Symbolic functioning in very young children：Understanding of pic-tures and models" 62 : 736-752, 1991

10 Loewenstein, J., "Spatial mapping in preschoolers：Close compari-sons facilitate far mappings" 2 (2): 189-219, 2001

11 DeLoache, J. S., "Reasoning and problem-solving, In Hand- book of child psychology：Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language" Wiley 801-850, 1998

12 DeLoache, J. S., "Rapid change in the symbolic functioning of very young child-ren" 238 : 1556-1557, 1987

13 Liben, L. S., "Pre-schoolers' understanding of plan and obli-que maps：The role of geometric and repre-sentational correspondence" 67 : 780-2796, 1996

14 DeLoache, J. S., "Physical similarity and young child-ren's understanding of scale models" 62 : 111-126, 1991

15 Downs, R. M., "On education and geographers：The role of cognitive developmental theory in geographic education" 78 (78): 680-700, 1988

16 DeLoache, J. S., "Multiple factors in early symbol use：Instructions, similarity, and age in understanding a symbol-referent relation" 14 : 299-312, 1999

17 Newcombe, N. S., "Making space：The development of spatial representation and reasoning" MIT Press 2000

18 Callaghan, T. C., "Factors affecting graphic symbol understanding in the third year：Language, similarity and iconicity" 15 : 207-236, 2000

19 Vosmik, J. R., "Facilitating preschooler's spatial mapping：Close comparisons and natural misalignment" Arizona State Univer- sity 2005

20 Vasilyeva, M. & Bowers, E., "Exploring the effects of similarity on mapping spatial relations" 106 : 221-239, 2010

21 DeLoache, J. S., "Early understanding and use of symbols：The model model" 4 (4): 109-113, 1995

22 DeLoache, J. S., "Early symbolic under- standing and use, In The psychology of learning and motivation" Academic Press 65-114, 1995

23 DeLoache, J. S., "Early development of the understanding and use of symbolic artifacts, In Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development" Blackwell 206-226, 2002

24 DeLoache, J. S., "Dual representation and young children's use of scale model" 71 : 329-338, 2000

25 Jung, M. R., "Development of spatial representation" Kookmin University 1995

26 Newcombe, N. S., "Development of spatial cognition, In Handbook of child psychology" John Wiley and Sons 734-776, 2006

27 Huttenlocher, J., "Developing symbolic capacity one step at a time" 106 : 1-12, 2008

28 Liben, L. S., "Developing an understanding of external spatial representation" Development of mental repre- sentation-theories and applications 1999

29 Sung, H. R., "Cognitive development" Hakjisa 2001

30 Flavell, J. H., "Cognitive development" Prentice Hall 2003

31 Dalke, D. E., "Charting the development of representational skills：When do children know that maps can lead and mislead?" 13 : 53-72, 1998

32 Gentner, D., "Analogical reminding：A good match is hard to find, In Simila- rity and analogical reasoning" Cambridge University Press 245-267, 1985