공익사업에 있어서 사인의 수용권에 관한 연구 - 공익사업을위한토지등의취득및보상에관한법률을 중심으로 - = A Study on the Private Person's Right of Expropriation for the Public Works - Centering on the Law on the Acquisition & Compensation for the Land etc. Expropriated for the Public Works -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The recent trend is to allow a private business to extensively grant the right of expropriation for the public works in order to induce an investment. It is therefore imperative to institutionalize the private person's right of expropriation by limiting it to only the essential type of public works violating the citizen's property rights, so that it may not be abused. Since such private person's right of expropriation can be an act of administration enabling the acquisition of property, all parties involved including the citizens, not to mention the competent authorities governing such public works, should give priority to the public good throughout the whole process that is, from start to finish.
And those carrying out the public works often experience difficulty causing disagreement with the local residents either during the preparatory work or the compensation process, as they seek to secure access to the land owned by an unrelated person for surveying or investigation or removing obstacles or prospecting. For this reason the role of a self-governing body should be established settling the disputes between the local residents and those carrying out the public works.
Also the undertaker of such public works is required to give a public notice in the paper, providing an outline of the project, details of the land/property to be expropriated, timing and procedures for compensation, along with a separate notification to be made to the individual land owners. It is therefore desirable that the competent self-governing body should actively provide the administrative service; to do this, the self-governing body should have a clear grasp of the essence of the project from its early stage, actively take part in the compensation process, and provide local residents with the information relevant to the project.
In addition, the current dual system of the land acquisition and compensation for the public works should be united into a single system, systematizing the procedures and the standards while eliminating overlapping and inconsistency. In other words it needs to be ensured that rights of those compensated are protected and that public works are successfully completed.
And professionalism and efficiency should be given priority in the dealings of compensation. It is recommended that those to be compensated be given an opportunity to state their views, along with a reinforced legal remedy, ensuring the collection of their opinions and the protection of their rights. To ensure such professionalism and efficiency, the compensation task should be institutionalized and entrusted to the specialist compensation organ, so that compensation can be properly made while protecting the rights of those who are to be compensated. This, in turn, will enable the efficient management of the compensation task, leading to the curtailment of the compensation budget.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 H. U. Erichsen,

2 유하백, "현행 토지수용제도상 기본권 침해성에 관한 고찰" 한국토지공법학회 10 : 2000

3 정종섭, "헌법학원론" 박영사 2007

4 김철수, "헌법학개론" 박영사 2007

5 홍정선, "행정법원론(상),(하)" 박영사 2008

6 유지태, "행정법신론" 신영사 2007

7 정하중, "행정법개론" 법문사 2007

8 박균성, "행정법강의" 박영사 2007

9 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ․Ⅱ" 박영사 2007

10 김남진, "행정법Ⅰ․Ⅱ" 법문사 2007

11 김철용, "행정법Ⅰ․Ⅱ" 박영사 2007

12 김일중, "정부의 공공사업 추진을 위한 '토지수용권'과 민간의 재산권 보호를 위한 '환매권'에 관한 경제학적 분석" 한국재정학회 20 (20): 127-168, 2006

13 계기석, "자족적 신도시개발을 위한 기업의 참여방안 연구" 국토연구원 2004

14 구병삭, "신헌법학원론" 박영사 2007

15 임승택, "산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률(제22조 등의 위헌성에 대한 소고)" 2006

16 김남진, "사인을 위한 공용수용" 고려대학교 법학연구소 24 : 1986

17 김민호, "사인에 대한 공용수용권 특허의 위헌성 검토 - 미국의 사례를 중심으로 -" 한국토지공법학회 26 : 197-210, 2005

18 윤혜정, "민간제안에 의한 도시개발사업의 실태와 발전방안" 국토연구원 2005

19 제정부, "민간사업시행자에 의한 토지수용 법제"

20 김남철, "기업도시에서의 사인을 위한 토지수용의 법적 문제" 한국토지공법학회 24 : 573-596, 2004

21 김명길, "기업도시개발특별법에 관한 법리적 연구" 부산대학교 대학원 2007

22 황해봉, "기업도시, 혁신도시 및 행정중심복합도시 법제에 대한 토지공법적 검토" 한국토지공법학회 37 (37): 95-122, 2007

23 국회사무처 법제실, "기업도시 건설의 법적 쟁점"

24 건설교통부, "기업도시 개발에 따른 토지수용권 검토 용역"

25 정연주, "공용침해의 허용요건으로서의 공공필요" 1 (1): 1990

26 雄川一郞, "野宏. 園部逸夫編: 現代行政法大案(全10卷)"

27 和田英夫, "行政法講義 : 上"

28 兼 子 仁, "行政法總論"

29 遠藤傳也, "行政法 II(名論)"

30 藤田宙靖, "行政法 I (總論)"

31 齊藤壽, "現代行政法論"

32 和田英夫, "新版行政法"

33 박태현, "『사인을 위한 공용침해』再考- 경제개발을 위한 수용의 합헌성에 관한 미국연방대법원 판례를 중심으로 -" 한국토지공법학회 40 : 45-68, 2008

34 Redecker, "verwaltungsgerichtsordnung" Kommentar 1986

35 H.J.Knack, "Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz" Kommentar 1994

36 H, J. Wolff, "Verwaltungsrecht Ⅰ"

37 Tschirra, "Verwaltungsprozessrecht"

38 C.H. Ule, "VerwaltungsprozeBrecht : 7. Aufl"

39 F. Mayer, "Allgemeiness Verwaltungsrecht, Athenaum" Konigstein/Ts 1982

40 Dieter Schmalz, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht, teil 1 ․ 2"

41 Peine, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht, 7. Aufl" Heidelberg 2004

42 Maurer, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht, 11. Aufl"

43 F. Mayer, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht"

44 H. Maurer, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht"