RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국의 산림 분야별 평가와 이에 기초한 산림 공적개발원조 발전 방안 = Di5sion 5 ; A Strategy for Official Development Assistance in Forest Sector based on Evaluation by Field in Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100266942

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to draw policy implications for the development and expansion ofKorea’s forest ODA through investigating the perceptions of stakeholder on the fields that contributed thedevelopment of forestry in Korea and would have competitiveness in developing countries and priority fields forKorea’s forest ODA. For this, the survey was conducted for 248 subjects from the general and expertstakeholder groups. Chi-square test in cross analysis, independent sample t-test, ANOVA and Duncan test wereconducted to compare the difference of perceptions by group. The whole general and expert groups consider that‘forest conservation and rehabilitation’ contributed to the development of Korea’s forestry most and consider itsglobal competitiveness most high. Comparing expert groups, ODA experts evaluated the competitiveness of‘capacity building for policies, institutions and research’ higher than the forestry experts. For priority fields ofKorea’s forest ODA, general groups perceived ‘management of CERs’ and ‘conservation of biodiversity’ mostimportant, showing the clear difference in perception compared to that of experts. In Conclusion, for theeffective forest ODA of Korea, the effort to fill the gap between the general and expert groups needs to bemade, as well as developing forestry capacity building programs to cope with the fields such as climate changeadaptation and biodiversity conservation, which is newly required in a global society, in addition to using thepast experience of forest rehabilitation in Korea. It will be useful for the rehabilitation of North Korea’s forestin the future.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to draw policy implications for the development and expansion ofKorea’s forest ODA through investigating the perceptions of stakeholder on the fields that contributed thedevelopment of forestry in Korea and would have c...

    The purpose of this study was to draw policy implications for the development and expansion ofKorea’s forest ODA through investigating the perceptions of stakeholder on the fields that contributed thedevelopment of forestry in Korea and would have competitiveness in developing countries and priority fields forKorea’s forest ODA. For this, the survey was conducted for 248 subjects from the general and expertstakeholder groups. Chi-square test in cross analysis, independent sample t-test, ANOVA and Duncan test wereconducted to compare the difference of perceptions by group. The whole general and expert groups consider that‘forest conservation and rehabilitation’ contributed to the development of Korea’s forestry most and consider itsglobal competitiveness most high. Comparing expert groups, ODA experts evaluated the competitiveness of‘capacity building for policies, institutions and research’ higher than the forestry experts. For priority fields ofKorea’s forest ODA, general groups perceived ‘management of CERs’ and ‘conservation of biodiversity’ mostimportant, showing the clear difference in perception compared to that of experts. In Conclusion, for theeffective forest ODA of Korea, the effort to fill the gap between the general and expert groups needs to bemade, as well as developing forestry capacity building programs to cope with the fields such as climate changeadaptation and biodiversity conservation, which is newly required in a global society, in addition to using thepast experience of forest rehabilitation in Korea. It will be useful for the rehabilitation of North Korea’s forestin the future.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 장준호, "국제개발협력의 두 가지 모델 비교연구: 독일과 일본의 공적개발원조(ODA)를 중심으로" 한국세계지역학회 26 (26): 311-339, 2008

    2 김영환, "공적개발원조(Official Development Assistance)와 개발교육에 대한 교사들의 인식 연구" 과학교육연구소 51 (51): 423-439, 2012

    3 Alesina, A., "Who gives foreign aid to Whom and Why?" 5 (5): 33-63, 2000

    4 Chong, A., "What determines foreign aid? The donor’s perspective" 87 : 1-13, 2008

    5 Kwon, Y., "Trends in Korean public opinion about foreign aid" Korea Institute for International Economic Policy 2011

    6 Moon, K.Y., "The study of British foreign aid policy and implementation architecture" 5 (5): 75-112, 2013

    7 Heo, J., "The policy and strategy of agriculture ODA and cooperation between agriculture and forestry" KREI 2013

    8 Yoo, B.I., "The Status and Strategies of Forest ODA for Millenium Development Goals and Sustainable Forest Management" Korea Forest Research Institute 2014

    9 Yoo, B.I., "The Change of World’s Forest Resources and Direction of Korea’s Forest ODA Cooperation" 28 (28): 101-119, 2005

    10 Jung, J.S., "Supporting desertification challenges in Africa:lessons for South Korea’s foreign aid policy" 2 (2): 95-126, 2010

    1 장준호, "국제개발협력의 두 가지 모델 비교연구: 독일과 일본의 공적개발원조(ODA)를 중심으로" 한국세계지역학회 26 (26): 311-339, 2008

    2 김영환, "공적개발원조(Official Development Assistance)와 개발교육에 대한 교사들의 인식 연구" 과학교육연구소 51 (51): 423-439, 2012

    3 Alesina, A., "Who gives foreign aid to Whom and Why?" 5 (5): 33-63, 2000

    4 Chong, A., "What determines foreign aid? The donor’s perspective" 87 : 1-13, 2008

    5 Kwon, Y., "Trends in Korean public opinion about foreign aid" Korea Institute for International Economic Policy 2011

    6 Moon, K.Y., "The study of British foreign aid policy and implementation architecture" 5 (5): 75-112, 2013

    7 Heo, J., "The policy and strategy of agriculture ODA and cooperation between agriculture and forestry" KREI 2013

    8 Yoo, B.I., "The Status and Strategies of Forest ODA for Millenium Development Goals and Sustainable Forest Management" Korea Forest Research Institute 2014

    9 Yoo, B.I., "The Change of World’s Forest Resources and Direction of Korea’s Forest ODA Cooperation" 28 (28): 101-119, 2005

    10 Jung, J.S., "Supporting desertification challenges in Africa:lessons for South Korea’s foreign aid policy" 2 (2): 95-126, 2010

    11 Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, "Public opinion poll on development and policy research on Korean government’s development cooperation policy" 2008

    12 Ball, R., "Political, economic and humanitarian motivations for PL 480 Food aid: Evidence from Africa" 44 : 515-547, 1996

    13 OECD DAC, "Peer Review Republic of Korea"

    14 Maizels, A., "Motivations for aid to developing countries" 879-900, 1984

    15 Lummsdaine, D.H., "Moral vision in international politics:The foreign aid regime, 1949-1989" Princeton University Press 1989

    16 Lee, K.J., "Modularization of Korea’s Development Experience:Saemaul Undong and Forest Rehabilitation in Korea:Saemaul income boosting project and the role of the village forestry cooperative" KSP School of Public Policy and Management 2013

    17 Kwon, Y. Lee, J. Y., "Korean public opinion about foreign aid" Korea Institute for International Economic Policy 2012

    18 Kwon, Y., "Korean public opinion about foreign aid" Korea Institute for International Economic Policy 2013

    19 Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, "Korean attitude toward ODA policy and awareness raising efforts"

    20 Moyo, D., "Dead Aid: Why aid is not working and how there Is another way for Africa" Penguin Books Ltd 2009

    21 Han, J.K., "Analysis of perceptions of Korean development NGOs on international development cooperation" Child Fund Korea 2013

    22 Rajan, R., "Aid and Growth: What does the cross-country evidence really show?" 90 (90): 643-665, 2008

    23 JICA, "Achieving Poverty Alleviation through Biodiversity Conservation"

    24 Yoon, J. Y., "A Study on the direction of Korean official development assistance in forestry" 40 (40): 19-26, 2013

    25 Yoo B. I., "2013 Modularization of Korea’s Development Experience: Forest Resource Development in Korea" KSP 2013

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-09 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국임학회 -> 한국산림과학회
    영문명 : 미등록 -> Korean Society of Forest Science
    KCI등재
    2018-01-01 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국임학회지 -> 한국산림과학회지
    외국어명 : Journal of Korean Forest Society -> Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science
    KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-10-10 학술지등록 한글명 : 한국임학회지
    외국어명 : Journal of Korean Forest Society
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.7 0.7 0.65
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.65 0.62 0.871 0.12
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼