RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    영국의 겸업주의와 이해상충방지에 관한 연구 = A Study on the U.K. Universal Banking System and Any Solutions for Curing Conflict of Interest Problems

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Top two countries with the most developed financial system in the EU are Germany and the United Kingdom. Both countries are similar in terms of the universal banking system, but are different in detail. In Germany, the Banking Act does apparently authorize a pure universal bank model, thereby allowing many commercial banks to conduct securities businesses directly under their roofs. German banks are allowed to conduct broad scopes of financial activities including commercial banking and investment banking and so forth. The Germany banking system contributed to the enactment of 'the EC Credit Institutions Directive of 2000' (hereinafter 'the Directive 2000').
    Due to a current global financial crisis caused by the bankruptcy of the Lehman Brothers in 2008, the U.S. Congress swiftly enacted 'the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act' (hereinafter 'the Dodd-Frank Act') which has been effective since July of 2010. The Dodd-Frank Act includes the Volker Rule which prohibits commercial banks from conducting securities activities by their own accounts and from investing PEFs and hedge funds. This event make us reconsider the EU banking system itself in order to determine that the EU will also need to reform its system based on either the Volker Rule or the Dodd-Frank Act. The commercial banking department of a pure universal bank may be easily subject to contagion from serious risks of an investment banking department such as a subprime crisis. If all the EU countries adopted the Directive 2000 based on the German banking system, they would be severely impaired by the sub-prime crisis. However, this is not the case because the U.K. has established its own universal banking model, so called a subsidiary model, rather than faithfully following to the Directive 2000.
    This paper overviews the current U.K. model and analyzes deeply reasons why the U.K. has developed its own universal banking model different from other EU countries. Old Acts and practices are also considered. Part II generally introduces the universal bank model of the Directive 2000 in order to emphasize the unique characters of a subsidiary model in the U.K. Part Ⅲ deals with the overall U.K. universal banking model, views the background of a Big Bang in 1987, and analyzes the permissible securities activities of a subsidiary corporation in a financial group. Part Ⅳ refers to the conflict of interest problems in a financial group when conducting both commercial banking and investment banking activities and searches any tools for solving those problems in the context of either current laws or self regulations. Finally, part Ⅴ is a conclusion of this paper.
    번역하기

    Top two countries with the most developed financial system in the EU are Germany and the United Kingdom. Both countries are similar in terms of the universal banking system, but are different in detail. In Germany, the Banking Act does apparently auth...

    Top two countries with the most developed financial system in the EU are Germany and the United Kingdom. Both countries are similar in terms of the universal banking system, but are different in detail. In Germany, the Banking Act does apparently authorize a pure universal bank model, thereby allowing many commercial banks to conduct securities businesses directly under their roofs. German banks are allowed to conduct broad scopes of financial activities including commercial banking and investment banking and so forth. The Germany banking system contributed to the enactment of 'the EC Credit Institutions Directive of 2000' (hereinafter 'the Directive 2000').
    Due to a current global financial crisis caused by the bankruptcy of the Lehman Brothers in 2008, the U.S. Congress swiftly enacted 'the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act' (hereinafter 'the Dodd-Frank Act') which has been effective since July of 2010. The Dodd-Frank Act includes the Volker Rule which prohibits commercial banks from conducting securities activities by their own accounts and from investing PEFs and hedge funds. This event make us reconsider the EU banking system itself in order to determine that the EU will also need to reform its system based on either the Volker Rule or the Dodd-Frank Act. The commercial banking department of a pure universal bank may be easily subject to contagion from serious risks of an investment banking department such as a subprime crisis. If all the EU countries adopted the Directive 2000 based on the German banking system, they would be severely impaired by the sub-prime crisis. However, this is not the case because the U.K. has established its own universal banking model, so called a subsidiary model, rather than faithfully following to the Directive 2000.
    This paper overviews the current U.K. model and analyzes deeply reasons why the U.K. has developed its own universal banking model different from other EU countries. Old Acts and practices are also considered. Part II generally introduces the universal bank model of the Directive 2000 in order to emphasize the unique characters of a subsidiary model in the U.K. Part Ⅲ deals with the overall U.K. universal banking model, views the background of a Big Bang in 1987, and analyzes the permissible securities activities of a subsidiary corporation in a financial group. Part Ⅳ refers to the conflict of interest problems in a financial group when conducting both commercial banking and investment banking activities and searches any tools for solving those problems in the context of either current laws or self regulations. Finally, part Ⅴ is a conclusion of this paper.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정찬우, "미국 금융개혁법의 주요 내용 및 시사점" 한국금융연구원 2010

    2 김용재, "독일 금융산업에서의 겸업주의의 최근 동향" 한국비교사법학회 13 (13): 619-646, 2006

    3 김선호, "겸업은행제도의 도입에 대한 연구" 한국금융연구원 1997

    4 김용재, "資本市場統合法上資金受託者義務의 全面的인 導入必要性" 한국금융법학회 4 (4): 23-52, 2007

    5 Edwards, Jeremy, "Universal Banks and German Industrialization: A Reappraisal" 49 (49): 1996

    6 Canals, Jordi, "Universal Banking: International Comparisons and Theoretical Perspectives" Oxford University Press 1997

    7 Saunders, Anthony, "Universal Banking in the United States: What Could We Gain? What Could We Lose?" Oxford University Press 1994

    8 Benston, George J., "The Separation of Commercial and Investment Banking: The Glass-Steagall Act Revisited and Reconsidered" Oxford University Press 1990

    9 Deutsche Bundesbank, "The Performance of German Credit Institutions in 1999. in: Monthly Report" 2000

    10 Scott, Hal S., "The Global Financial Crisis" Foundation Press 2009

    1 정찬우, "미국 금융개혁법의 주요 내용 및 시사점" 한국금융연구원 2010

    2 김용재, "독일 금융산업에서의 겸업주의의 최근 동향" 한국비교사법학회 13 (13): 619-646, 2006

    3 김선호, "겸업은행제도의 도입에 대한 연구" 한국금융연구원 1997

    4 김용재, "資本市場統合法上資金受託者義務의 全面的인 導入必要性" 한국금융법학회 4 (4): 23-52, 2007

    5 Edwards, Jeremy, "Universal Banks and German Industrialization: A Reappraisal" 49 (49): 1996

    6 Canals, Jordi, "Universal Banking: International Comparisons and Theoretical Perspectives" Oxford University Press 1997

    7 Saunders, Anthony, "Universal Banking in the United States: What Could We Gain? What Could We Lose?" Oxford University Press 1994

    8 Benston, George J., "The Separation of Commercial and Investment Banking: The Glass-Steagall Act Revisited and Reconsidered" Oxford University Press 1990

    9 Deutsche Bundesbank, "The Performance of German Credit Institutions in 1999. in: Monthly Report" 2000

    10 Scott, Hal S., "The Global Financial Crisis" Foundation Press 2009

    11 Baums, Theodor, "The German Banking System: System of the Future?" 19 : 1993

    12 Wilmarth, Jr. Arthur E., "The Dark Side of Universal Banking: Financial Conglomerates and the Origin of the Subprime Financial Crisis" 41 (41): 2009

    13 Langevoort, Donald C., "Statutory Obsolescence and the Judicial Process: The Revisionist Role of the Court in Federal Banking Regulation" 85 : 1987

    14 Herbert Ⅲ, A. J., "Requiem on the Glass-Steagall Act: Tracing the Evolution and Current Status of Bank Involvement in Brokerage Activities" 63 : 1988

    15 Cranston, Ross, "Principles of Banking Law 2d ed" 2003

    16 "Brief Summary of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act"

    17 Nance, Mark E., "Banking's Influence over Non-bank Companies after Glass-Steagall: A German Universal Comparison" 14 (14): 2000

    18 McCoy, Patricia A., "Banking Law Manual, 2d ed" LEXIS 2001

    19 Zavvos, George S., "Banking Integration and 1992: Legal Issues and Policy Implications" 31 : 1990

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.77 0.77 0.8
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.7 0.65 0.772 0.44
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼