방통융합 환경에서의 주파수 정책 이슈의 국가간 비교 연구: 미국과 한국의 주파수 관련 뉴스보도의 의미 연결망 분석 = A Comparative Study on the Spectrum Policy Issues in Convergence Environment Semantic Network Analysis of News Coverage in the U.S. and S. Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The advancement of radio technology and diverse services has increased dependence on wireless communications all over the world. The demand for spectrum resources is therefore also skyrocketing, which brings about concerns regarding problems of spectrum scarcity in the near future. Accordingly, there has been much argument regarding which policy model of spectrum management (i.e., command and control model, market-based model, common and sharing approach, or open approach) is the most appropriate for improving spectrum efficiency and flexible usage in the current wireless market. In this context, this research conducts a comparative semantic network analysis on the spectrum policy in S. Korea and the U.S. There has been considerable discussion about the efficient policy models of spectrum management in both countries, considering the changing telecommunications environment. However, each country`s spectrum management policy has not been well explained in the previous literature. With a theoretical framework of policy issue network and a methodological approach of a semantic network analysis, this paper empirically examines which policy model of spectrum management has been employed in S. Korea and the U.S. Moreover, this research analyzes and compares the current spectrum management policy in S. Korea to that in the U.S. The analysis was conducted in two steps. First, a total of 128 core keywords regarding the spectrum policy were extracted from the representative IT news sites in S. Korea and the U.S for the period 2006-2009, and co-occurrence matrices of the keywords in each country were tabulated. Second, network-related measures including eigenvector centrality, hierarchical clustering, and multidimensional scaling (MDS) were performed. The results of the network analyses showed that regulatory agency (e.g., Korean Communications Commission) emerged as a central keyword in S. Korea`s policy issue network, while the market players (e.g., carrier, Verizon, Sprint Nextel) were more commonly used in the U.S. In addition, broadcasters and related keywords (e.g., cable TV, broadcasting) were relatively more central in S. Korea than in the U.S. It is also noteworthy that the keyword ``auction`` was relatively central compared to the other keywords in S. Korea. These results imply that the policy on spectrum management in S. Korea is still based on the command and control model with a hint of a market-based model.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최계영, "해외 주요국 전파관리제도" 정보통신정책연구원 2005

2 이준웅, "프레임, 해석, 그리고 커뮤니케이션 효과" 29 : 85-153, 2000

3 오남석, "주파수시장 및 기술 패러다임 변화에 따른 연구" 2009

4 여재현, "주파수 공유정책 현황 및 시사점-CR을 중심으로" 정보통신정책연구원 2008

5 고길곤, "정책네트워크 연구의 유용성과 사회연결망 이론 활용 방법의 고찰" 한국행정연구소 45 (45): 138-164, 2007

6 박상원, "정책네트워크 모형을 통한 방통융합기구 논의 분석: 행위자, 구조 및 상호작용을 중심으로" 17 : 91-112, 2006

7 이준웅, "언론의 틀 짓기 기능과 여론의 변화" 100-135, 1997

8 박재천, "새로운 주파수관리 패러다임의 분석과 정책제안" 정보통신정책학회 13 (13): 143-169, 2006

9 김용학, "사회연결망 분석" 박영사 2006

10 윤석민, "방송통신 융합시대의 방송주파수 관리정책" 한국방송학회 (62) : 109-133, 2006

11 정재철, "미국 대테러 전쟁에 관한 텔레비전 뉴스 프레임: KBS 9시 뉴스를 중심으로" 13 : 257-278, 2001

12 이대호, "미국 FCC의 망중립성 규제에 관한 NPRM과 이에 대0한 찬반 동향" 정보통신정책연구원 2010

13 김선남, "매매춘 관련 TV 뉴스의 프레임 분석" 한국방송학회 16 (16): 41-76, 2002

14 이준웅, "뉴스 틀 짓기 연구의 두 개의 뿔" 한국언론학회 5 (5): 104-132, 2009

15 김옥일, "교육행정정보화 정책네트워크 구조 변화에 관한 연구: 사회연결망 분석의 적용" 한국행정연구소 46 (46): 255-279, 2008

16 이준웅, "갈등적 사안에 대한 여론 변화를 설명하기 위한 프레이밍 모형 검증 연구: 정부의 통일 정책에 대한 뉴스 프레임의 형성과 해석적 프레임의 구성을 중심으로" 한국언론학회 49 (49): 133-162, 2005

17 Doerfel, M. L., "What constitutes semantic network analysis?" 21 : 16-26, 1998

18 Borgartti, S. P., "UCINET VI 6.90. Natick" Analytic Technologies 2002

19 Monge, P. R., "Theories of communication networks" Oxford University Press 2003

20 Gitlin, T., "The wohole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left" University of California Press 1980

21 Lee, Y. O., "The reconfiguration of E-campaign practices in Korea: A case study of the presidential primaries of 2007" 25 (25): 2007

22 Faulhaber, M. C., "The future of wireless telecommunications: spectrum as a critical resource" 18 : 256-271, 2006

23 Coase, R. H., "The federal communication commission" 2 : 1-40, 1959

24 Cooper, M., "The economics of collaborative production in the spectrum commons" 379-400, 2005

25 Werbach, K., "Supercommons: Toward a unified theory of wireless communications" 82 (82): 863-972, 2004

26 van Dijk, T. A., "Structures of news in the press. in: Discousrse and communication: New approaches to the analysis of mass media discourse and communication" W. de Gruyter 69-93, 1985

27 Hazlett, T. W., "Spectrum tragidies" 22 : 242-273, 2005

28 Noam, E. M., "Spectrum auctions: yesterday’s heresy, today’s orthodoxy, tomorrow’s anachronism: Taking the next step to open spectrum access" 56 (56): 765-790, 1998

29 Benjamin, S. M., "Spectrum abundance and the choice between private and public control" 78 : 2007-2102, 2007

30 Benkler, Y., "Some economics of wireless communications.. in: Rethinking rights and regulations: Institutional responses to new communication technologies" MIT Press 2003

31 Wasserman, S., "Social network analysis: Methods and applications" Cambridge University Press 1994

32 Scott, J., "Social network analysis: A handbook" Sage Publications 1991

33 Carley, K. M., "Semantic connectivity: An approach for analyzing symbols in semantic networks" 3 : 183-213, 1993

34 Buck, S., "Replacing spectrum auctions with a spectrum commons. Stanford Technology Law Review, 2"

35 Barnett, G. A., "Reading in the Galileo system: Theory, methods and applications" Kendall/ Hunt 1988

36 Rhodes, R. A. W., "Policy network analysis. in: The Oxford handbooks of political science" Oxford University Press 425-446, 2006

37 FCC, "Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Docket(No" 2009

38 Rhodes, R. A. W., "New directions in the study of policy networks" 21 (21): 181-205, 1992

39 Gamson, W. A., "Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructional approach" 95 (95): 1-37, 1989

40 Lehr, W., & Crowcroft, J., "Managing shared access to a spectrum commons"

41 Farquhar, M. C., "Legal and regulatory issues regarding spectrum rights trading" 27 : 527-532, 2003

42 Heclo, H., "Issue networks and the executive establishment. in: The New American Political System" American Enterprise Institution 87-124, 1978

43 Nelson, T. E., "Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion" 61 (61): 1040-1067, 1999

44 Rice, R. E., "Is it really just a like a fancy answering machine? Comparing semantic networks of different types of voicemail users" 30 : 369-397, 1993

45 Iyengar, S., "Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues" University of Chicago Press 1994

46 Johnson, S. C., "Hierarchical clustering schemes" 3 : 241-254, 1967

47 Smith, M. J., "From policy community to issue networks: Salmonella in eggs and the new politics of food" 69 (69): 235-255, 1991

48 Stewart, C. M., "Framing the digital divide:A comparison of US and EU policy approaches" 8 (8): 731-751, 2006

49 Pan, S., "Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse" 10 : 55-75, 1993

50 Entman, R. M., "Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incident" 10 : 155-173, 1991

51 Bonacich, P., "Factoring and weighting approaches to stats scores and clique identification" 2 : 113-120, 1972

52 Collins, A. M., "Experiments on semantic memory and language comprehension. in: Cognition in learning and memory" Wiley 117-138, 1972

53 Monge, P. R., "Emergent communication networks. in: Handbook of organizational and management communication" Sage 204-242, 1987

54 Gans, H., "Deciding what’s news" Patheon 1979

55 Carley, K., "Conding choices for texual analysis: A Comparison of content analysis and map analysis" 23 : 75-126, 1993

56 Ting, C., "Comparing welfare for spectrum property and spectrum commons governance regimes" 29 : 711-730, 2005

57 Rogers, E. M., "Communication networks: toward a new paradigm for research" Free Press 1981

58 Tonmukayakul, A., & Weiss, B. H, "A transaction cost analysis of secondary vs.unlicensed spectrum use"

59 Doerfel, M. L., "A semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association" 25 (25): 589-603, 1999

60 Hwang, J., "A mixed spectrum management framework for the future wireless service based on techno-economic analysis: The Korean spectrum policy study" 33 : 407-421, 2009