RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    다문화사회와 사회적 기본권

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82391730

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The policy for foreigners in Korea is now facing a new problem which has emerged with the large influx of foreign workers especially since 1990s as well as with the increasing rate of the international marriage. With the anticipated low fertility and the aging population structure, the policy for foreigners is likely to increase considerably in the Korean society. This article has the object to explore the constitutional social right status of foreigners in Korea. To put it concretely, two questions will be raised here: (1) Are foreigners eligible to constitutional social rights?; (2) In which ways could these rights be realized? There seemed to be neither explicit constitutional ground to develop the reasoning on these questions, nor recognition on this matter in mind of Korean Constitution Fathers. Theoretically, discussions on the basic constitutional right status of foreigners could provide the clue on this matter. However, it has been discussed without consideration on the complexity and particularity of the multi-cultural society. To approach this problem, some points will be made here. First, the concept of the nationality as the subject of the basic constitutional rights and the nexus of the nationality and the territory should be reconsidered in a new perspective. The questions is as follows; Is the nationality the exclusive status given to enjoy basic constitutional rights, or is it just natural and inclusive eligibility making people to enjoy the rights, which is derived from the nexus to the territory and can be expanded to whom have the similar relation to the territory. Second, basic consitutional rights regulate the relationship between the nation and individuals in the living spheres. These rights are realized, on the one hand, bilaterally between the state and individuals, on the other hand, in participating in forming the community order. The basic constitutional social rights of foreigners should be coordinated considering two positions, namely the subject of the human rights and the members of the community. Finally, we should take some more points into account: that the contents of the constitutional social rights in detail cannot be decided by the Constitution itself but are formed through the multi-tier decision-making of the legislative and executive branch; that it is also realized through the detailed administrative process considering the diverse situations and problems that foreigners are facing.
    번역하기

    The policy for foreigners in Korea is now facing a new problem which has emerged with the large influx of foreign workers especially since 1990s as well as with the increasing rate of the international marriage. With the anticipated low fertility and ...

    The policy for foreigners in Korea is now facing a new problem which has emerged with the large influx of foreign workers especially since 1990s as well as with the increasing rate of the international marriage. With the anticipated low fertility and the aging population structure, the policy for foreigners is likely to increase considerably in the Korean society. This article has the object to explore the constitutional social right status of foreigners in Korea. To put it concretely, two questions will be raised here: (1) Are foreigners eligible to constitutional social rights?; (2) In which ways could these rights be realized? There seemed to be neither explicit constitutional ground to develop the reasoning on these questions, nor recognition on this matter in mind of Korean Constitution Fathers. Theoretically, discussions on the basic constitutional right status of foreigners could provide the clue on this matter. However, it has been discussed without consideration on the complexity and particularity of the multi-cultural society. To approach this problem, some points will be made here. First, the concept of the nationality as the subject of the basic constitutional rights and the nexus of the nationality and the territory should be reconsidered in a new perspective. The questions is as follows; Is the nationality the exclusive status given to enjoy basic constitutional rights, or is it just natural and inclusive eligibility making people to enjoy the rights, which is derived from the nexus to the territory and can be expanded to whom have the similar relation to the territory. Second, basic consitutional rights regulate the relationship between the nation and individuals in the living spheres. These rights are realized, on the one hand, bilaterally between the state and individuals, on the other hand, in participating in forming the community order. The basic constitutional social rights of foreigners should be coordinated considering two positions, namely the subject of the human rights and the members of the community. Finally, we should take some more points into account: that the contents of the constitutional social rights in detail cannot be decided by the Constitution itself but are formed through the multi-tier decision-making of the legislative and executive branch; that it is also realized through the detailed administrative process considering the diverse situations and problems that foreigners are facing.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼