RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      EU 경쟁법에 대한 현대화(Modernization)의 절차적 및 실체적 측면에 대한 고찰 = A study on procedural and substantive aspects of modernization in EU Competition Law

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102072898

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The modernization in EU Competition Law was procedurally and institutionally motivated by restructuring of enforcement system with the expansion of EU. Responding to this challenge, Commission intended to decentralize the enforcement system and adjust the substantive laws to decentralized enforcement system. Namely, in order to apply EU Competition Law uniformly, the objective of Law should be unitary so that it is not dispersed to other objectives other than competition itself. Furthermore, the criteria for each regulation in Law should be abstract and general to keep consistency even when they are applied by many competition national authorities. It is the economic analysis that is expected to be the proper measure to maintain the uniformity and consistency in EU Competition Law. In this way the modernization originating from the problems in procedure and institutional aspects naturally continued to substantive aspects, with influences of Neo-classical economics and experts and scholars in US being added on. Reflecting on the process of substantive modernization, the demand for consistency in each regulation in Law has been the powerful motivation. However, the consistency rationale of Commission which is the premise for substantive modernization is questionable when we consider there have been quite different responses to modernization for each regulation in EU. In this sense, we need to understand more accurately and deeply each regulation`s intrinsic purpose and function within the whole system of Competition Law. So to speak, it might be necessary to admit that more economic approach could be used more comprehensively in some areas, but not in other areas. The modernization in EU Competition Law is currently underway. We, as a third party, should observe this process carefully focusing on the response of EU Courts from now on, having in mind that we had better relativize their discussion and results rather than accept uncritically.
      번역하기

      The modernization in EU Competition Law was procedurally and institutionally motivated by restructuring of enforcement system with the expansion of EU. Responding to this challenge, Commission intended to decentralize the enforcement system and adjust...

      The modernization in EU Competition Law was procedurally and institutionally motivated by restructuring of enforcement system with the expansion of EU. Responding to this challenge, Commission intended to decentralize the enforcement system and adjust the substantive laws to decentralized enforcement system. Namely, in order to apply EU Competition Law uniformly, the objective of Law should be unitary so that it is not dispersed to other objectives other than competition itself. Furthermore, the criteria for each regulation in Law should be abstract and general to keep consistency even when they are applied by many competition national authorities. It is the economic analysis that is expected to be the proper measure to maintain the uniformity and consistency in EU Competition Law. In this way the modernization originating from the problems in procedure and institutional aspects naturally continued to substantive aspects, with influences of Neo-classical economics and experts and scholars in US being added on. Reflecting on the process of substantive modernization, the demand for consistency in each regulation in Law has been the powerful motivation. However, the consistency rationale of Commission which is the premise for substantive modernization is questionable when we consider there have been quite different responses to modernization for each regulation in EU. In this sense, we need to understand more accurately and deeply each regulation`s intrinsic purpose and function within the whole system of Competition Law. So to speak, it might be necessary to admit that more economic approach could be used more comprehensively in some areas, but not in other areas. The modernization in EU Competition Law is currently underway. We, as a third party, should observe this process carefully focusing on the response of EU Courts from now on, having in mind that we had better relativize their discussion and results rather than accept uncritically.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이봉의, "시장지배적 지위남용: 경제적 접근방법의 효용 및 한계" 법경제분석그 룹 2008

      2 "http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-05-537_en.htm?locale= en"

      3 Gerber, "Two Forms of Modernization in European Competition Law" 31 (31): 2008

      4 Schmidt, "The New ECMR: “Significant Impediment” or “Significant Improvement”?" 41 (41): 2004

      5 Dreher, "The More Economic Approach to Art" ZWeR 3 : 2006

      6 Basedow, "The Modernization of European Competition Law: A Story of Unfinished Concepts" 42 : 529-, 2007

      7 Ehlermann, "The Modernization of EC Antitrust Policy: A Legal and Cultural Revolution" 37 (37): 2000

      8 Hawk, "System Failure: Vertical Restraints and EC Competition Law" 32 (32): 1995

      9 Rousseva, "Rethinking Exclusionary Abuses in EU Competition Law" Hart Publishing 2010

      10 Kroes, "Preliminary Thoughts on Policy Review of Article 82" Speech at the Fordham Corporate Law Institute 2005

      1 이봉의, "시장지배적 지위남용: 경제적 접근방법의 효용 및 한계" 법경제분석그 룹 2008

      2 "http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-05-537_en.htm?locale= en"

      3 Gerber, "Two Forms of Modernization in European Competition Law" 31 (31): 2008

      4 Schmidt, "The New ECMR: “Significant Impediment” or “Significant Improvement”?" 41 (41): 2004

      5 Dreher, "The More Economic Approach to Art" ZWeR 3 : 2006

      6 Basedow, "The Modernization of European Competition Law: A Story of Unfinished Concepts" 42 : 529-, 2007

      7 Ehlermann, "The Modernization of EC Antitrust Policy: A Legal and Cultural Revolution" 37 (37): 2000

      8 Hawk, "System Failure: Vertical Restraints and EC Competition Law" 32 (32): 1995

      9 Rousseva, "Rethinking Exclusionary Abuses in EU Competition Law" Hart Publishing 2010

      10 Kroes, "Preliminary Thoughts on Policy Review of Article 82" Speech at the Fordham Corporate Law Institute 2005

      11 "Monti, Commissioner for Competition ‘Merger Control in the European Union: a radical reform’ Speech of 7 November 2002"

      12 Fiebig, "Modernization of European Competition Law as a Form of Convergence" 19 : 63-, 2005

      13 Forrester, "Modernization of EC Competition Law" 23 : 1028-, 2000

      14 Gerber, "Law and the Abuse of Economic Power in Europe" 62 (62): 1987

      15 Gerber, "Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe-Protecting Prometheus" Oxford University Press 2001

      16 Kling, "Kartellrecht" Verlag Franz Vahlen München 2007

      17 Ehlermann, "Implementation of EC Competition Law by National Anti-trust Authorities" 17 (17): 1996

      18 Gerber, "Global Competition - Law, Markets, and Globalization" Oxford University Press 2010

      19 Buxbaum, "German Legal Culture and the Globalization of Competition Law: A Historical Perspective on the Expansion of Private Antitrust Enforcement" 23 : 474-, 2005

      20 Künzler, "Effizienz oder Wettbewerbsfreiheit? - Zur Frage nach den Aufgaben des Rechts gegen private Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen, Walter Eucken Institut Untersuchung zur Ordnungstheorie und Ordnungspolitik 56" Mohr Siebeck 2008

      21 Thomas, "Dominance and the More Economic Approach-Is the traditional understanding of dominance an outdated concept?" 2010

      22 Lowe, "Director General for Competition ‘The Future shape of European Merger Control’ Speech"

      23 Dreher, "Die Zukunft der Missbrauchsaufsicht in einem ökonomisierten Kartellrecht" 1 : 2008

      24 European Advisory Group for Competition Policy, "An economic approach to Art"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.86 0.86 0.93
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.86 0.981 0.86
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼