RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    자기효능감과 기업성과 = 창업지향성과 창업경험의 역할

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100857011

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial experience are useful as explanatory variables in explaining the effects of self-efficacy on firm performance. According to the upper echelon theory, CEO plays a critical role in shaping and positioning the organization strategically to achieve performance, using their personal traits of individuals to influence organizational dynamics(Carmeli, 2008). Although previous research has suggested that self-efficacy had a positive effect on firm performance(Drnovsek & Glas, 2002; Hmielesky & Baron, 2008; Westerberg, Singh, & Hackner, 1997), there is limitation in explaining how self-efficacy influences firm performance. Attention has been turned to entrepreneurial orientation (EO) in explaining entrepreneurial performance (Moruku, 2013). Entrepreneurial experience has been suggestedas an useful explanatory variable to account for firm performance (Lee & Tsang, 2001; Schiller& Crewson, 1997). Little attention has been turned to the role of entrepreneurial experience in the entrepreneurial orientation-firm performance relationship. The present study, therefore, developed the new research model that includes entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial experience, extending the current model that includes the effect of self-efficacy on firm performance. This study examined relationships among self-efficacy, entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial experience, and firm performance. Data were collected from 146 entrepreneurs in Korea. We used path analysis and regression analysis to test the direct and indirect effects of self-efficacy on perceptual measures of firm performance, as well as how firm performance might be moderated by entrepreneurial experience. Entrepreneurial orientation was used as the mediating variable for explaining the relationship between self-efficacy and firm performance. Entrepreneurial experience was used as the moderating variable for explaining the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation firm performance. Results indicated that self-efficacy and entrepreneurial orientation were positively related to firm performance. Self-efficacy also influenced firm performance positively through its effect on entrepreneurial orientation. Especially, entrepreneurial experience strengthened the positive relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance. The authors discuss both the study``s implications and future research directions.
    번역하기

    Entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial experience are useful as explanatory variables in explaining the effects of self-efficacy on firm performance. According to the upper echelon theory, CEO plays a critical role in shaping and positioning ...

    Entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial experience are useful as explanatory variables in explaining the effects of self-efficacy on firm performance. According to the upper echelon theory, CEO plays a critical role in shaping and positioning the organization strategically to achieve performance, using their personal traits of individuals to influence organizational dynamics(Carmeli, 2008). Although previous research has suggested that self-efficacy had a positive effect on firm performance(Drnovsek & Glas, 2002; Hmielesky & Baron, 2008; Westerberg, Singh, & Hackner, 1997), there is limitation in explaining how self-efficacy influences firm performance. Attention has been turned to entrepreneurial orientation (EO) in explaining entrepreneurial performance (Moruku, 2013). Entrepreneurial experience has been suggestedas an useful explanatory variable to account for firm performance (Lee & Tsang, 2001; Schiller& Crewson, 1997). Little attention has been turned to the role of entrepreneurial experience in the entrepreneurial orientation-firm performance relationship. The present study, therefore, developed the new research model that includes entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial experience, extending the current model that includes the effect of self-efficacy on firm performance. This study examined relationships among self-efficacy, entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial experience, and firm performance. Data were collected from 146 entrepreneurs in Korea. We used path analysis and regression analysis to test the direct and indirect effects of self-efficacy on perceptual measures of firm performance, as well as how firm performance might be moderated by entrepreneurial experience. Entrepreneurial orientation was used as the mediating variable for explaining the relationship between self-efficacy and firm performance. Entrepreneurial experience was used as the moderating variable for explaining the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation firm performance. Results indicated that self-efficacy and entrepreneurial orientation were positively related to firm performance. Self-efficacy also influenced firm performance positively through its effect on entrepreneurial orientation. Especially, entrepreneurial experience strengthened the positive relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance. The authors discuss both the study``s implications and future research directions.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 유봉호, "청년창업자의 심리특성과 내재적 동기가 창업성공 가능성에 미치는 영향" 대한경영학회 26 (26): 2669-2690, 2013

    2 권명중, "창업중소기업의 생존 및 성장에 관한 연구" 22 (22): 185-208, 2000

    3 중소기업청, "지표 : 중소기업위상"

    4 조준희, "소자본 창업의 경영성과요인에 관한 탐색적 연구" 대한경영학회 24 (24): 1757-1773, 2011

    5 강영욱, "소상공인 창업자특성과 창업준비과정이 창업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 자기효능감 매개효과를 중심으로" 한국디지털정책학회 10 (10): 239-251, 2012

    6 박동수, "소상공인 창업에서 개인특성과 만족도 및재무적성과간의관계" 34 (34): 95-115, 2000

    7 Jackson, W. T., "Who is it and what it does : Finding the ‘heffa-preneur’" 7 (7): 17-29, 2001

    8 Parker, L. E., "When to fix it and when to leave: Relationships among perceived control, self-efficacy, dissent, and exit’" 78 (78): 949-959, 1993

    9 Hmielesky, K. M., "When does entrepreneurial self-efficacy enhance versus reduce firm performance?" 2 (2): 57-72, 2008

    10 Krueger, N. F., "What lies beneath : The experiential essence of entrepreneurial thinking" 31 (31): 123-142, 2007

    1 유봉호, "청년창업자의 심리특성과 내재적 동기가 창업성공 가능성에 미치는 영향" 대한경영학회 26 (26): 2669-2690, 2013

    2 권명중, "창업중소기업의 생존 및 성장에 관한 연구" 22 (22): 185-208, 2000

    3 중소기업청, "지표 : 중소기업위상"

    4 조준희, "소자본 창업의 경영성과요인에 관한 탐색적 연구" 대한경영학회 24 (24): 1757-1773, 2011

    5 강영욱, "소상공인 창업자특성과 창업준비과정이 창업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 자기효능감 매개효과를 중심으로" 한국디지털정책학회 10 (10): 239-251, 2012

    6 박동수, "소상공인 창업에서 개인특성과 만족도 및재무적성과간의관계" 34 (34): 95-115, 2000

    7 Jackson, W. T., "Who is it and what it does : Finding the ‘heffa-preneur’" 7 (7): 17-29, 2001

    8 Parker, L. E., "When to fix it and when to leave: Relationships among perceived control, self-efficacy, dissent, and exit’" 78 (78): 949-959, 1993

    9 Hmielesky, K. M., "When does entrepreneurial self-efficacy enhance versus reduce firm performance?" 2 (2): 57-72, 2008

    10 Krueger, N. F., "What lies beneath : The experiential essence of entrepreneurial thinking" 31 (31): 123-142, 2007

    11 Chen, G., "Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale" 4 (4): 62-83, 2001

    12 Hambrick, D. C., "Upper echelons theory : An update" 32 (32): 334-343, 2007

    13 Storey, D. J., "Understanding the small business sector" International Thompson Business Press 1994

    14 Reuber, R. A., "Understanding the consequences of founders’ experience" 37 (37): 30-45, 1999

    15 Carmeli, A., "Top management team behavioural integration and the performance of service organizations" 33 (33): 712-735, 2008

    16 MacMillan, I. A., "To really learn about entrepreneurship, lets study habitual entrepreneurs" 1 (1): 241-243, 1986

    17 Wiklund, J., "The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship" 24 (24): 37-48, 1999

    18 Baum, J. R., "The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth" 89 (89): 587-598, 2004

    19 Jo, H., "The relationship between an entrepreneur's background and performance in a new venture" 16 (16): 161-171, 1996

    20 Nurittamont, W., "The relationship among organizational commitment, self-efficacy and businesses performance : An empirical study of hotel businesses in Thailand" 12 : 99-108, 2012

    21 Politis, D., "The process of entrepreneurial learning : A conceptual framework" 29 (29): 399-424, 2005

    22 Slater, S. F., "The positive effect of a market orientation on business profitability : A balanced replication" 48 (48): 69-73, 2000

    23 Glaser, R., "The nature of expertise" Lawrence Erlbaum 1988

    24 Baron, R. M., "The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research : Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations" 51 : 1173-1182, 1986

    25 Zhao, H., "The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions" 90 (90): 1265-1272, 2005

    26 Hakala, H., "The interplay between orientations : Entrepreneurial, technology and customer orientations in software companies" 18 (18): 265-290, 2010

    27 Sequeira, J. M., "The influence of social ties and self-efficacy in forming entrepreneurial intentions and motivating nascent behavior" 12 (12): 275-293, 2007

    28 Boyd, N., "The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intent and actions" 2 : 63-77, 1994

    29 Shane, S., "The individual-opportunity nexus" Edward Elgar 2003

    30 Simsek, Z., "The impact of CEO core self-evaluation on the firm's entrepreneurial orientation" 31 : 110-119, 2010

    31 Chandler, G. N., "The founders self-assessed competence and venture performance" 7 (7): 223-236, 1992

    32 Drnovsek, M., "The entrepreneurial self-efficacy of nascent entrepreneurs : The case of two economies in transition" 10 (10): 107-131, 2002

    33 Zhou, K. Z., "The effects of strategic orientations on technologyand market-based breakthrough innovations" 69 : 42-60, 2005

    34 Matsuno, K., "The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and market orientation on business performance" 66 (66): 18-32, 2002

    35 Lee, D. Y., "The effects of entrepreneurial personality, background and network activities on venture growth" 38 (38): 583-602, 2001

    36 Hafeez, S., "The effect of market and entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance" 3 (3): 389-395, 2011

    37 Miller D., "The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms" 29 (29): 770-791, 1983

    38 Krueger, N. F., "The cognitive infrastructure of opportunity emergence" 24 (24): 5-23, 2000

    39 Cooper, A. C., "The State of the Art of Entrepreneurship" Kent Publishing Co 1992

    40 Anderson, J. C., "Structural equation modeling in practice : A review and recommended two-step approach" 103 (103): 411-423, 1988

    41 Covin, J. G., "Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation-sales growth rate relationships" 30 (30): 57-81, 2006

    42 Venkatraman, N., "Strategic orientation of business enterprises : The construct, dimensionality, and measurement" 35 : 942-962, 1989

    43 Covin, J. G., "Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments" 10 : 75-87, 1989

    44 Covin, J. G., "Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset" Blackwell Publishers 309-327, 2002

    45 Bandura, A., "Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory" Prentice-Hall 1986

    46 Bandura, A., "Social cognitive theory : An agentic perspective" 52 : 1-26, 2001

    47 Burke, A., "Self-employment wealth and job creation : the roles of gender, non-pecuniary motivation and entrepreneurial ability" 19 (19): 255-270, 2002

    48 Bandura, A., "Self-efficacy: The exercise of control" W. H. Freeman and Company 1997

    49 Krishnan, B. C., "Self-efficacy, competitiveness, and effort as antecedents of salesperson performance" 22 (22): 285-295, 2002

    50 Barling, J., "Self-efficacy and Sales Performance" 5 (5): 41-51, 1983

    51 Gist, M. E., "Self-efficacy : A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability" 17 (17): 183-211, 1992

    52 Cliff, J., "New to the game and questioning the rules : Experiences and beliefs of founders of imitative vs. innovative firms" 21 (21): 633-650, 2006

    53 Wood, R. E., "Mechanisms governing organizational performance in complex decision-making environments" 46 (46): 181-202, 1990

    54 Markman, G. D., "Inventors and newventure formation : The effects of general self-efficacy and regretful thinking" 27 : 149-165, 2002

    55 Ireland, R. D., "Integrating entrepreneurship actions and strategic management actions to create firm wealth" 15 (15): 49-63, 2001

    56 Miller, D., "Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms : Two models of strategic momentum" 3 (3): 1-25, 1982

    57 Yang, B., "Individual differences and sales performance : A distal-proximal mediation model of selfefficacy, conscientiousness, and extraversion" 31 (31): 371-382, 2011

    58 Li, Y., "Incentive mechanisms, entrepreneurial orientation, and technology commercialization : Evidence from China's transitional economy" 25 (25): 63-78, 2008

    59 Stuart, R., "Impact of entrepreneurial and management experience on early performance" 5 : 151-162, 1990

    60 Krueger, N. F., "How believing in ourselves increases risk taking : Perceived self-efficacy and opportunity recognition" 25 (25): 385-400, 1994

    61 Speier, C., "Generalized selfefficacy as a mediator and moderator between control and complexity at work and personal initiative : A longitudinal field study in East Germany" 10 : 171-192, 1997

    62 Keeley, R. H., "Frontiers of entrepreneurship research" Babson College for Entrepreneurial Studies 140-141, 1995

    63 De Noble, A. F., "Frontiers of entrepreneurship research" PandR Publications Inc 73-87, 1999

    64 Westhead, P., "Experience and cognition: do novice, serial, and portfolio entrepreneurs differ?" 23 (23): 72-98, 2005

    65 OECD, "Entrepreneurship at a Glance 2013" OECD Publishing 2013

    66 Dess G. G., "Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance : Tests of contingency and configurational models" 18 (18): 677-695, 1997

    67 Schiller, B. R., "Entrepreneurial origins : A longitudinal inquiry" 35 (35): 523-531, 1997

    68 Avlonitis, G. J., "Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs, product innovativeness, and performance" 60 (60): 566-575, 2007

    69 Wiklund, J., "Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance : A configurational approach" 20 (20): 71-91, 2005

    70 Davis, J. L., "Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance : The moderating role of managerial power" 25 (25): 41-54, 2010

    71 Lyon, D. W., "Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation research : Operationalizing and measuring a key strategic decisionmaking process" 26 : 1055-1085, 2000

    72 Poon, J. M. L., "Effects of self-concept traits and entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance" 24 (24): 61-82, 2006

    73 Westerberg, M., "Does the CEO matter? An empirical study of small Swedish firms operating in turbulent environments" 13 (13): 251-270, 1997

    74 Chen, C. C., "Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?" 13 : 295-316, 1998

    75 Moruku, R. K., "Does entrepreneurial orientation predict entrepreneurial behaviour?" 17 : 41-60, 2013

    76 Papastathopoulos, A., "Does entrepreneurial experience and strategy really matter for ICT performance? A greek cross-border empirical study" 13 (13): 177-186, 2010

    77 Anderson, E. W., "Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability : Findings from Sweden" 58 : 53-66, 1994

    78 Rowe, W. G., "Creating wealth in organizations : The role of strategic leadership" 15 (15): 81-94, 2001

    79 MacMillan, . I. C., "Corporate venturing : Alternatives, obstacles encountered, and experience effects" 1 (1): 177-191, 1986

    80 Zahra, S. A., "Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurshipperformance relationship : A longitudinal analysis" 10 : 43-58, 1995

    81 Podsakoff, P. M., "Common method biases in behavioral research : A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies" 88 (88): 879-903, 2003

    82 Lumpkin, G. T., "Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance" 21 (21): 135-172, 1996

    83 Wiklund, J., "Aspiring for, and achieving growth : The moderating role of resources and opportunities" 40 (40): 1919-1941, 2003

    84 Maiga, A. S., "Antecedents and consequences of quality performance" 17 : 111-131, 2005

    85 Pajares, F., "Advances in motivation and achievement" JAI Press 1-49, 1997

    86 중소기업청, "2012년도 중소기업 육성시책" 2011

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼