종전 70주년과 21세기 미국의 동북아 동맹전략 -전후체제 변경시도에 대한 공격적 현실주의의 평가와 대응방안- = The 70th Anniversary of World War II and the US Alliance Strategy in the Northeast Asian Region

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

2015 is the 70th anniversary of the end of the WWII. The historic moment like this has two different meanings. First, it``s time to rearrange and restart the historical clock. Second, it``s time to remind ourselves the lessons we should not forget from historical experiences. US alliance strategy in Northeast Asian region after the WWII has been based on the combination of strong S.Korea-US alliance and US-Japan alliance. The strategy has basically aimed to keep stable regional order, but importantly it has also had the function to prevent Japanese remilitarization. With the rise of China and relative decline of US, United States is now trying to alter the basics of its regional alliance system strengthening Japanese military role. However, the approach has the danger to strengthen the tensions between China and Japan, and the tensions between the two can be transferred to degeneration of US-China relations. US should keep the basic rules of combination of the two alliances limiting the military role of Japan. And by allowing S.Korea to develop S.Korea- China relations with S.Korea US alliance, the country can send signal of its real intention that US wants to keep cooperative relationship with China as long as it can be.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이영학, "한국의 안보와 국방" 한국국방연구원 2015

2 설인효, "오바마 2기 행정부의 국방, 군사 정책 전망― 아시아 중시정책의 군사적 함의를 중심으로 ―" 한일군사문화학회 16 : 41-74, 2013

3 신욱희, "미중일 관계 전망에 대한 이론적 검토: 통합적 이론으로서 위협균형/위협전이론" 서울대아시아연구소 2 (2): 2012

4 이상국, "미중 소프트 패권경쟁 시대: 한국의 전략적 선택" 한국국방연구원 2013

5 설인효, "미어세이머의 공격적 현실주의 이론과 21세기 동북아 국제질서：방어, 공격적 현실주의 논쟁과 공격적 현실주의 재평가" 분쟁해결연구센터 10 (10): 123-156, 2012

6 설인효, "군사혁신(RMA)의 전파와 미중 군사혁신 경쟁: 19세기 후반 프러시아-독일 모델의 전파와 21세기 동북아 군사질서" 한국국제정치학회 52 (52): 141-169, 2012

7 설인효, "국제관계이론과 동북아 패권경쟁 제2막: 공격적 현실주의를 중심으로" 2014

8 Kirshner, Jonathan, "The Tragedy of Offensive Realism" 18 (18): 2010

9 Mearsheimer, John J, "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" W.W. Norton & Company 2001

10 Mearsheimer, John J, "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" W.W. Norton & Company 2014

11 Snyder, Glenn, "The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics" 36 (36): 1984

12 Kennedy, Paul M, "The Rise and fall of the great powers :economic change and military conflict from 1500 to 2000" Vintage Books 1987

13 Department of Defense, "The Quadrennial Defense Review" 2014

14 Lebow, Richard Ned, "The Long Peace, the End of the Cold War, and the Failure of Realism" 48 : 1994

15 Friedberg, Aaron, "The Debate Over US China Strategy" Survival 2015

16 Cronin, Patrick, "The Challenge of Responding to Maritime Coercion" Center for a New American Security 2014

17 Zeihan, Peter, "The Accidental Super Power" Twelve 2014

18 설인효, "Offensive Realism, and the Interpretation of North East Asian Regional Order: Debates between Mearsheimer’s Offensive Realism and Its Alternative Perspectives" 한국전략문제연구소 21 (21): 179-210, 2014

19 Kapstein, Ethan B, "Is Realism Dead? The Domestic Sources of International Politics" 49 : 1995

20 Nye, Jr. Joseph, "Is American Century Over?" Polity Press 2015

21 Department of Defense, "Defense Strategy Guidance" 2012

22 Rudd, Kevin, "Beyond Pivot: A New Roadmap for US Chinese Relations" (4) : 2011