도덕과 수업에서의 쿠레레(Currere) 방법의 적용 = A Study on the Application of ‘Currere’ Method in Moral Education

국문 초록 (Abstract)

도덕과 교육은 학생들의 삶 속에서 바람직한 도덕성 함양과 그 실천을 목표로 한다고 볼 수 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 학생들의 삶과 경험이 소외되어 있는 현행 도덕과 교육과 수업이 학생들의 도덕성 발달에 실제적으로 기여할 수 있는가 하는 문제점에 착안하여, 이를 극복할 수 있는 대안으로서 쿠레레(currere) 방법을 도덕과 수업에 적용하였으며, 연구의 결과는 질적 연구방법을 통해 분석하였다.연구의 결과, 쿠레레 방법은 학생들의 삶과 경험이 중심이 되는 도덕 수업, 열린 마음으로 타자와 함께 하는 도덕수업, 도덕적 앎이 삶으로 연결되는 도덕수업을 가능하게 함으로써 도덕성의 인지, 정서, 행동의 통합적 발달을 도모할 수 있는 도덕교육의 방법론적 가능성을 시사하였다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to find the educational significance of 'Currere', suggested by Pinar and Grumet as a methodological model of curriculum reconceptualization, by applying it in moral education to overcome the problems and limitations of current moral education curriculum, textbooks, and instruction in Korea.
The developed procedures were applied in the middle school moral education with ten classes of 7th grade for two periods in a week, totally eight periods in each class, and students' learning activities were done through the autobiographical writing.
The results of the application in moral education were as follows. First, a moral education in which life and experience become the focus. In 'Currere' method, students had opportunities to reflect their lives and experience. Second, a moral education in which students encounter with others with open mind. Third, a moral education in which knowing and doing got into one.
The application of 'Currere' method in moral education had an educational significance in that it could work out problems and limitations of the existing moral education curriculum and instruction by making students' lives and experience the focus of moral education, trying to integrative development of cognition, emotion, and behavior in morality.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 고진호, "한국교육에 있어서 탈교과서주의적 경향성 분석" 한국교육과정학회 16 (16): 245-276, 1998

2 김영천, "질적/후기 실중주의 연구 작업에서 고려해야 할 방법적 이슈들" 한국교육과정학회 14 (14): 41-72, 1996

3 교육인적자원부, "중학교 도덕 1 교사용 지도서" 서울: 지학사 2005

4 손승남, "자서전의 교육학적 가치" 한국교육철학학회 (28) : 109-125, 2002

5 박순경, "자기주도성의 교육과정 이론적 기초로서의 ‘쿠레레 방법’에 대한 一考" 한국교육과정학회 19 (19): 159-173, 2001

6 김영천, "생애사 텍스트로서의 교육과정연구" 한국교육과정학회 22 (22): 49-81, 2004

7 한혜정, "미국 교육과정연구 패러다임의 변화가 한국 교육과정연구에 주는 시사" 한국교육과정학회 22 (22): 251-265, 2004

8 심성보, "도덕교육의 담론" 서울: 학지사 1999

9 김정효, "도덕교육에서의 질적 연구: 활성화를 위한 탐색" 한국교육인류학회 6 (6): 25-80, 2003

10 고미숙, "대화와 도덕교육" 교육철학회 26 : 21-46, 2001

11 허숙, "교육과정의 재개념화를 위한 이론적 탐색" 한국교육학회 33 (33): 217-242, 1995

12 김억환, "교육과정 재개념화로서 currere이론의 전개(1973-1993) 및 비판" 한국교육과정학회 13 : 245-276, 1995

13 박순경, "교육과정 이해에 있어서의 텍스트 읽기의 의미" 한국교육학회 23 (23): 209-230, 1996

14 In W. Pinar, "“The analysis of educational experience”" 384-395, 1975a

15 In W. Pinar, "“The Method of Currere” Essays in curriculum theory 1972-1992" 1975c

16 Butt, "“Studying the nature and development of teachers′ knowledge using collaborative autobiography” International Journal of Educational Research" 402-449, 1992

17 In W. Pinar, "“Search for a method”" 15-424, 1975b

18 Brady, "“Redeemed from time Learning through autobiography“" 43-52, 1990

19 In Pinar, "“Existential and phenomenological foundation of autobiographical method” Understanding Curriculum as Phenomenological and Deconstruction text" Teachers College Press 28-43, 19921992

20 N, "“Conversation as Moral Education“ Journal of Moral Education" (ddings) : 1990

21 Kridel, C, "Writing Educational Biography: Explorations in qualitative research" NY: Garland Publishing Inc 1998

22 Pinar, W, "What is Curriculum Theory?" New Jersey: Lawrewce Erlbaum Associates Publishers 2004

23 Pinar, W, "Understanding Curriculum: An Introduction to the Study of Historical and Contemporary Curriculum Discourses" New York : Peter Lang 1995

24 W, "Understanding Curriculum as Phenomenological and Deconstruction text" Columbia University Teachers College Press. 1992

25 J, "Transformative Dimentions of Adult Learning" Jossey-Bass. 1991

26 Glaser, "The Discovery of Grounded Theory Strategies for qualitative research" 1967

27 Miller, "Teachers collaborating for empowerment State University of New York Press." 1990

28 Peter Lang, "Politics and Sexuality Essays in Curriculum Theory 1972-1992. New York" 1994

29 Clandinin, D. J, "Narrative Inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research" San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers 2000

30 van Manen, "Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy State University of New York Press." 1990

31 Vaughn S, "Focus Group Interview in Education and Psychology" California: Sage 1996

32 Vaughn S, "Focus Group Interview in Education and Psychology" California: Sage 1996

33 “The trial”, "Essays in curriculum theory 1972-1992" 1976

34 Goodson, "Episodes in Educational Research" 1991

35 Denzin, "Entering the field of qualitative research” Handbook of Qualitative Research" N. K. & Lincoln In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln Sage publications Inc. 1-17. 1994

36 J, "Does Hegel′s critique of Kant apply to discourse ethics" 1990

37 Binder D. L, "Curriculum Odyssey: Facilitating an international olympic education project" University of Alberta 2002

38 W, "Basic problems in modern education. Tempe College of Education" Arisona State University 147-171, 1974

39 Grumet, "Autobiography and the analysis of educational experience” Cambridge Journal of Education" 277-282, 1990

40 Griffiths, M, "Autobiography and epistemology" 47 (47): 1995

41 L, "A Structural and Cultural Analysis of Conversational Storytelling" 1985

42 Doerr, M. N, "A High School Ecology Curriculum Employing Currere: A critical postmodern approach to pedagogy" The Pensylvania state university the graduate school college of education 2000