RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    [일반논문] 세대정치의 등장과 지역주의

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75962081

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    One of the key features of the 2002 presidential election was the emergence of generational politics, Young voters supported Roh Moo-hyun, the candidate of the ruling Millenium Democratic Party(MDP), whereas older voters favored Lee Hoi-chang, the candidate of the opposition Grand National Party(GNP). According to recent studies, differing political ideologies by generation was the main reason why generation became a significant factor for candidate choice in the last election. The younger generation favored the progressive candidate Roh because they were more progressive, and the older generation supported Lee because they were more conservative, In other words, generational cleavage has overlapped with ideological cleavage,<br/>
    This article addresses the following two questions, First, how and to what extent did generation overlap with political ideology in candidate choice of the last presidential election, We measure the polarization ratio of political ideology by generation, by utilizing Yule's Q as a statistical indicator. Findings from this analysis show that generation strongly overlapped with ideological position in candidate choice. Hence, we argue that differing political preference by generation as well as ideology can be labelled as . generation-ideology cleavage' .<br/>
    Second, we discuss the political consequences of emerging generational politics. In particular, this article examines whether the emergence of generational politics would undermine regionalism as an obstinate obstacle in Korean electoral politics. To do so we focus on the electorates of Cholla and Kyungsang provinces and compare voting behaviors of the three groups which belong to differing generation-ideology categories. The major findings of this analysis are mixed. Younger, progressive voters of the Kyungsang province show a lower intensity of regionalist voting than older, conservative voters. This clearly indicates that the emergence of generation-ideology cleavage would undermine regionalism in the Kyungsang province. By contrast, Cholla voters do not show a clear difference of candidate choice between younger, progressive and older, conservative groups, and maintain a higher intensity of regionalist voting. These findings do not allow us to predict that the emergence of generational politics will weaken regionalism. However, since we find out that generational cleavage is closely related with ideological cleavage, we need to pay close attention to the political consequences of generation-ideology cleavage.
    번역하기

    One of the key features of the 2002 presidential election was the emergence of generational politics, Young voters supported Roh Moo-hyun, the candidate of the ruling Millenium Democratic Party(MDP), whereas older voters favored Lee Hoi-chang, the can...

    One of the key features of the 2002 presidential election was the emergence of generational politics, Young voters supported Roh Moo-hyun, the candidate of the ruling Millenium Democratic Party(MDP), whereas older voters favored Lee Hoi-chang, the candidate of the opposition Grand National Party(GNP). According to recent studies, differing political ideologies by generation was the main reason why generation became a significant factor for candidate choice in the last election. The younger generation favored the progressive candidate Roh because they were more progressive, and the older generation supported Lee because they were more conservative, In other words, generational cleavage has overlapped with ideological cleavage,<br/>
    This article addresses the following two questions, First, how and to what extent did generation overlap with political ideology in candidate choice of the last presidential election, We measure the polarization ratio of political ideology by generation, by utilizing Yule's Q as a statistical indicator. Findings from this analysis show that generation strongly overlapped with ideological position in candidate choice. Hence, we argue that differing political preference by generation as well as ideology can be labelled as . generation-ideology cleavage' .<br/>
    Second, we discuss the political consequences of emerging generational politics. In particular, this article examines whether the emergence of generational politics would undermine regionalism as an obstinate obstacle in Korean electoral politics. To do so we focus on the electorates of Cholla and Kyungsang provinces and compare voting behaviors of the three groups which belong to differing generation-ideology categories. The major findings of this analysis are mixed. Younger, progressive voters of the Kyungsang province show a lower intensity of regionalist voting than older, conservative voters. This clearly indicates that the emergence of generation-ideology cleavage would undermine regionalism in the Kyungsang province. By contrast, Cholla voters do not show a clear difference of candidate choice between younger, progressive and older, conservative groups, and maintain a higher intensity of regionalist voting. These findings do not allow us to predict that the emergence of generational politics will weaken regionalism. However, since we find out that generational cleavage is closely related with ideological cleavage, we need to pay close attention to the political consequences of generation-ideology cleavage.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 세대-이념균열의 등장
    • 3. 세대-이념균열과 지역균열과의 관계
    • 4. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 세대-이념균열의 등장
    • 3. 세대-이념균열과 지역균열과의 관계
    • 4. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • 부록
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2020-04-22 학회명변경 한글명 : 아세아문제연구소 -> 아세아문제연구원
    영문명 : Asiatic Research Center -> Asiatic Research Institute
    KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-10-10 학술지명변경 한글명 : 亞細亞 硏究 -> 아세아연구
    외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Asiatic Studies
    KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.76 0.76 0.64
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.54 0.56 1.013 0.16
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼